HiveMQ GmbH
Germany · www.hivemq.com · 20 vendors
HiveMQ GmbH is an industrial data platform that provides real-time data streaming for IoT and industrial AI applications. It leverages the MQTT protocol to connect, contextualize, and analyze operational data from edge to cloud, enabling enterprises to achieve intelligent operations. The platform is designed for reliability, scalability, and security, serving critical use cases across various industries.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 15
- Digital Resilience: 8
- Financial Resilience: 6
Technology vendors
- Demandware — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Usercentrics GmbH — Technology — Germany
- and 18 more
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 20 sub-vendors.
- MQTT Broker
Insights
Last updated 2026-06-11 · revision 2
20 direct vendors, 242 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 1
- Austria: 1
- United States: 14
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Netherlands: 4
- Portugal: 2
- UK: 1
Migration Readiness: 9/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
HiveMQ exhibits very high migration readiness. Their internal tech stack is predominantly cloud-native and modern, utilizing Kubernetes, Docker, and operating across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform. This indicates a highly containerized, orchestrated, and portable environment. Their product offerings, such as HiveMQ Cloud, are fully managed on major cloud platforms, and the HiveMQ Broker can be self-managed across various cloud and on-premise environments, showcasing a strong multi-cloud and hybrid-cloud strategy. This inherent flexibility and portability significantly reduce technical barriers to migration. Furthermore, no specific data residency requirements have been specified, which simplifies potential migration efforts. While "Total Vendors: 0" is stated, the geographic diversity of implied vendors (7-8 unique countries) suggests that they are not heavily concentrated with vendors from a single region, which could otherwise complicate migration. The absence of financial stability data (revenue, growth) makes it impossible to assess the company's capacity to fund a large-scale migration. Similarly, the regulatory environment is not specified, leaving potential compliance challenges unknown. The "Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown" and the contradictory "Total Vendors: 0" prevent a precise assessment of vendor-related migration complexities, although their multi-cloud product strategy suggests a low internal lock-in philosophy.
Compliance
4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
SOC 2 (source) — Compliant
HiveMQ has achieved SOC 2 Type II compliance across all five trust criteria (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy). This demonstrates strong security controls and is appropriate for their cloud service provider role.
Evidence: https://www.hivemq.com/solutions/technology/hivemq-security, https://www.hivemq.com/blog/hivemq-achieves-soc-2-type-2-compliance-data-security
GDPR (source) — Compliant
HiveMQ GmbH is headquartered in Germany (EU) and explicitly states GDPR compliance in their privacy policy. They have implemented comprehensive data protection measures, appointed data controllers, and provide detailed privacy documentation. As an EU-based company processing personal data, GDPR compliance is mandatory and they demonstrate clear adherence.
Evidence: https://www.hivemq.com/legal/privacy-policy
ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant
HiveMQ has achieved ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, demonstrating implementation of comprehensive information security management systems. This significantly reduces security-related compliance risks.
Evidence: https://www.hivemq.com/solutions/technology/hivemq-security, https://www.hivemq.com/news/hivemq-Achieves-iso-iec-certification
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024:
- 2023:
- 2022:
Financial Resilience Score: 6/10
HiveMQ GmbH demonstrates qualitative strengths typical of a late-stage VC-backed enterprise SaaS company with a strong blue-chip customer base across automotive (BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Ford), pharma (Eli Lilly), CPG (Unilever), and utilities (FPL). Its MQTT broker technology is embedded in mission-critical production data pipelines, creating high switching costs and stickiness. The company has secured backing from reputable investors including Molten Ventures, Earlybird, Senovo, and Mubadala Capital, with a ~US$42M Series A in 2021 providing growth runway. However, financial transparency is limited as HiveMQ is a private German GmbH that files only abbreviated statutory accounts at the Bundesanzeiger, typically without P&L disclosure. Revenue, EBIT, and equity figures are not available in free public sources. As a VC-funded SaaS company likely investing aggressively in S&M and R&D, it is probably operating at a loss funded by equity capital. Competitive pressure from open-source alternatives (Eclipse Mosquitto, EMQX, VerneMQ) and hyperscaler IoT services (AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, Google Cloud Pub/Sub) presents ongoing risk. Customer concentration in the automotive vertical and the recent strategic pivot to 'Industrial AI Platform' (Oct 2025) introduce execution risk. Overall resilience is moderate, supported by strong customers and VC backing but constrained by opacity and typical scale-up cash-burn dynamics.
Key strengths: Blue-chip enterprise customer base (BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Ford, Eli Lilly, Unilever, FPL), Mission-critical technology with high switching costs (e.g., FPL streaming 140B data points/day), Strong VC backing from Molten Ventures, Earlybird, Senovo, and Mubadala Capital, ~US$42M Series A funding round in 2021, Product breadth expansion (Edge 2023, Data Hub 2023, Pulse 2025), Compliance certifications (SOC 2 Type II in 2024, ISO/IEC in 2023) supporting enterprise sales
Risk factors: Private VC-funded SaaS likely operating at a loss with cash burn risk, Competition from open-source alternatives (Eclipse Mosquitto, EMQX, VerneMQ), Competition from hyperscaler IoT services (AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, Google Cloud Pub/Sub), Customer concentration risk in automotive vertical, Execution risk on October 2025 strategic pivot to 'Industrial AI Platform', Limited financial transparency as a private GmbH with abbreviated filings
Workforce by country
- Germany: 138
- United States: 75
- Rest of EMEA: 50
- APAC: 12
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.