Ikast-Brande Kommune Due Diligence
Run due diligence on Ikast-Brande Kommune: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · ikast-brande.dk · 17 vendors
Ikast-Brande Kommune is a Danish municipal authority located in the Central Jutland region of Denmark, serving citizens and businesses across the municipality. It provides a wide range of public services including social welfare, childcare, employment, environmental management, and local governance. The municipality promotes itself as having Denmark's best business climate and emphasises digital self-service solutions for residents and companies.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 41
- Digital Resilience: 9
- Financial Resilience: 9
Technology vendors
- Dandomain A/S — Technology — Denmark
- KOMBIT A/S — Government & Public Sector — Denmark
- Prokom AS — Norway
- and 14 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-10-08 · revision 2
17 direct vendors, 215 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 3
- Norway: 1
- Australia: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Taiwan: 1
- Japan: 4
- China: 1
Migration Readiness: 8/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Ikast-Brande Kommune exhibits high migration readiness, largely due to its existing adoption of Google Cloud Platform (GCP) for hosting. This foundational cloud presence significantly reduces the technical hurdles associated with migrating to or further leveraging cloud-native architectures. A major advantage is the explicitly low vendor lock-in risk, supported by a diverse ecosystem of 16 vendors from 7 different countries, which provides flexibility in transitioning or integrating new solutions without significant contractual or technical impediments. The stable financial position of the municipality also suggests the capacity to fund necessary migration initiatives. However, the migration process will need to carefully navigate strict regulatory requirements, including GDPR, Danish national public administration laws, and the NIS2 Directive, particularly concerning data residency, which is specified as EU (likely Denmark). While GCP can accommodate these requirements with region-specific services, it adds a layer of complexity to planning and execution. The current tech stack, while modern in its service delivery, does not explicitly detail the extent of containerization or microservices adoption, which could influence the ease of a full-scale cloud-native transformation.
Compliance
9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
Danish Social Services Act — No public evidence
Danish municipalities are the primary administrators of the Social Services Act, responsible for providing a wide range of social services to citizens. This law is therefore directly applicable to Ikast-Brande Kommune.
Evidence: https://www.european-agency.org/country-information/denmark/legislation-and-policy, https://danify.dk/en/blog/local-government-in-denmark-municipalities-and-regions-expla-mocka6f2/, https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/denmark/organisation-and-governance, https://eng.uvm.dk/primary-and-lower-secondary-education/the-folkeskole/about-the-folkeskole, https://www.congress-monitoring.eu/en/4-pays.html, https://education-profiles.org/europe-and-northern-america/denmark/~non-state-actors-in-education
Danish Folkeskole Act — No public evidence
The operation of the public school system (Folkeskole) is a core responsibility of Danish municipalities, as mandated by the Danish Folkeskole Act. Ikast-Brande Kommune is therefore legally bound by this act.
Evidence: https://uvm.dk/grundskole/folkeskolen/organisering-og-ledelse/den-kommunale-opgave/kommunens-ansvar/, https://www.lovguiden.dk/loven/folkeskoleloven/20, https://www.skole-foraeldre.dk/artikel/kommunalbestyrelsen, https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/denmark-environment/?export-pdf, https://eng.mst.dk/industry/permits-and-inspections/environmental-inspection/danish-regulations, https://netzerocompare.com/policies/denmark-environmental-protection-act-pollution-control-and-enforcement-dk-miljobeskyttelsesloven
ISAE 3000 (source) — No public evidence
ISAE 3000 is an assurance standard for non-financial information, often used for reports on controls at a service organization. It is not a mandatory framework for a Danish municipality, but could be used to provide assurance over specific areas, for example, GDPR compliance.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: revenue DKK 3,238.4M, EBIT DKK 209.8M, equity DKK 1,813.1M
- 2024: revenue DKK 3,089.3M, EBIT DKK 193.1M, equity DKK 1,710.9M
- 2023: revenue DKK 2,975M, EBIT DKK 94.5M, equity DKK 1,558.8M
Financial Resilience Score: 9/10
Ikast-Brande Kommune demonstrates very strong financial resilience for a Danish municipality. The entity has delivered three consecutive years of ordinary operating surpluses that materially exceeded the original budget - DKK 94.5M in 2023, DKK 193.1M in 2024, and DKK 209.8M in 2025. The 2025 surplus was DKK 71.3M better than budget, equal to 2.5% of ordinary operating expenditure, reflecting disciplined expenditure management and compliance with service-expenditure ceilings agreed between the central government and KL. Equity has grown from DKK 1,558.8M (2023) to DKK 1,813.1M (2025), a 16.3% increase in two years. The balance sheet has strengthened materially: long-term debt fell 28% from DKK 673.9M (2023) to DKK 486.8M (2025), while cash reserves more than doubled from DKK 111.3M to DKK 235.2M. The municipality fully redeemed the DKK 55.6M frozen holiday-pay (Lønmodtagernes Feriemidler) liability in 2025. Accumulated carry-overs on operating budgets grew to DKK 229.3M, representing an additional buffer. The tax base is supported by a growing population (43,305 as of 1 January 2026) and a stable municipal tax rate of 25.1%, in line with the national average. Key risks are typical of Danish municipalities: demographic cost pressure on childcare (0-5 area ran at 106% of original budget), adult handicap/psychiatry and elderly home-care areas; dependence on central-government grants (~27.5% of income subject to annual negotiation); and large off-balance-sheet guarantees of DKK 859.6M, mainly for social housing and utilities. A modest CHF/DKK swap carries a market value of -DKK 46.9M. Overall, the municipality combines rising surpluses, falling debt, growing liquidity and a solid demographic base, warranting a high resilience score.
Key strengths: Three consecutive years of operating surpluses materially above budget (DKK 94.5M → 193.1M → 209.8M), Equity growth of 16.3% over two years to DKK 1,813.1M, Long-term debt reduced 28% in two years to DKK 486.8M, Cash reserves more than doubled to DKK 235.2M (2023-2025), Full redemption of DKK 55.6M frozen holiday-pay liability in 2025, Service expenditure kept within KL/government-agreed ceiling, Growing population base (43,305 as of 1 January 2026) supporting tax revenue, Accumulated operating carry-overs of DKK 229.3M provide additional buffer, Capital investment of DKK 107.2M stayed within DKK 125.9M national framework
Risk factors: Demographic cost pressure on childcare (0-5 area at 106% of budget), Rising costs in Psychiatry & Handicap and Home-care/Nursing areas, Mid-year reregulation reduced 2025 surplus by DKK 16.9M, Large contingent liabilities: guarantees of DKK 859.6M (social housing, utilities), ~27.5% revenue dependence on central-government grants and equalisation, CHF/DKK currency swap with market value of -DKK 46.9M, Specialist areas (family/vulnerable children, adult handicap, specialist dental care) flagged for rising costs
Revenue by geography
- Denmark: 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Taxes (Skatter): 72.5%
- Grants & equalisation (Tilskud og udligning): 27.5%
Workforce by country
- Denmark: 2797
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.