Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet

Denmark · owned by Government of Denmark (Denmark) · im.dk · 19 vendors

The Danish Ministry of Interior and Health is responsible for health policy, healthcare system oversight, municipal and regional governance, and interior affairs in Denmark. The ministry oversees various health agencies and works to develop a healthy Denmark through policy development and administration.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-02-02 · revision 16

19 direct vendors, 261 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Migration readiness is significantly constrained by strict regulatory and data residency requirements. As a handler of sensitive health data (GDPR Article 9) and a critical infrastructure entity (NIS2), the Ministry faces severe limitations on data mobility, requiring data to remain largely within Denmark or the EU. While the financial capacity to fund migration is high (>200B DKK), the likely reliance on custom 'Health Data Systems' and 'Election Management Systems' implies a monolithic architecture that is difficult to containerize or move to the public cloud. The presence of vendors from the US and Japan introduces potential cross-border data transfer complexities that further reduce migration agility.

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

Mandatory for this Danish government ministry as it processes personal data of EU citizens including health records, administrative data, and employee information.

As a Danish government ministry processing extensive personal data (citizen health records, administrative data, employee information), GDPR compliance is mandatory. Government entities face high scrutiny and potential legal challenges for non-compliance. The ministry handles sensitive health data requiring special category protections under GDPR Article 9. Non-compliance could result in significant fines up to 4% of annual budget and severe reputational damage to government credibility.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

Applies to the ministry as an Essential Entity under the 'public administration' sector responsible for health and interior affairs.

As a Danish government ministry responsible for health and interior affairs, this entity clearly falls under NIS2 as an Essential Entity in the 'public administration' sector. Government health ministries are critical infrastructure entities. Non-compliance could result in fines up to €10 million or 2% of annual turnover, plus potential security incidents affecting critical health and administrative services. The ministry's role in health policy and administration makes it a high-value target for cyber threats.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

Represents best practice for information security management for government entities handling sensitive health and administrative data.

While not legally mandatory, ISO 27001 is highly recommended for government entities handling sensitive data. Danish government entities often implement ISO 27001 as best practice for information security management. The risk is medium because while not legally required, lack of proper information security management could lead to data breaches, regulatory violations, and loss of public trust.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 10/10

The financial resilience of a central government ministry is directly tied to the sovereign creditworthiness of the state it serves. As an integral part of the Kingdom of Denmark, its financial obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the Danish government, which maintains a AAA credit rating. This sovereign backing ensures that the entity cannot become insolvent in a commercial sense. Funding is guaranteed through national taxation and the annual parliamentary budget process (Finansloven), making the ministry immune to market volatility, customer demand, or competitive pressures. The primary risks are political and operational rather than financial, such as shifts in government priorities or the management of large-scale public health crises.

Key strengths: Sovereign Backing (AAA Rating), Guaranteed Funding via Taxation, Parliamentary Budgetary Appropriations, Publicly Audited by National Audit Office

Risk factors: Budgetary Cuts due to political priority shifts, Policy Failure during public health crises, Operational Inefficiency leading to parliamentary scrutiny

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report