Integrator Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Integrator: track operational status, monitor disruption and compliance, and get alerts when suppliers, ownership or leadership change.

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · integrator.dk · 9 vendors

Integrator is a Danish IT company headquartered in Copenhagen that specializes in Business Intelligence, system integrations, and software innovation and development. The company helps businesses become more data-driven by delivering tailored IT solutions using technologies such as Phocas, Microsoft BizTalk, and Neuron ESB. Their primary focus is on solving business problems first, with technology as the enabler.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Integrator has an estimated 17% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

5 of Integrator's 9 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-23 · revision 3

9 direct vendors, 188 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Integrator demonstrates medium migration readiness. On the positive side, their internal tech stack is largely cloud-based (e.g., HubSpot, Atlassian Jira, Google services), indicating familiarity and comfort with SaaS and cloud environments for their own operations. Furthermore, their 'Innovation & Software Development' offering explicitly covers areas like IoT and AI-enabled platforms, suggesting internal capabilities and a strategic interest in modern, cloud-friendly technologies. This indicates they possess the internal skills and mindset to adopt cloud-native approaches where feasible. However, significant challenges exist due to their core business involving integration with diverse client systems, some of which may be legacy or on-premise (e.g., Microsoft Dynamics NAV, older SAP Business One implementations, Microsoft BizTalk Server, Neuron ESB). This means their own service delivery model is inherently tied to these potentially less cloud-native environments, complicating a full migration of their *offerings* to a purely cloud-native, containerized, or microservices architecture. The lack of specified data residency requirements is a major unknown that could pose significant compliance hurdles during migration, especially given their work with Danish public sector organizations. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' being unknown, particularly with proprietary ESB solutions, suggests potential complexities and costs in transitioning away from these platforms. Finally, the absence of financial stability data makes it difficult to assess their capacity to fund a large-scale migration initiative.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is not a legal requirement but a widely recognized standard for information security management. It is highly relevant for a B2B technology and data integration company to demonstrate security posture to clients.

As a technology company handling client data, lacking an information security certification like ISO 27001 can be a competitive disadvantage and may be a contractual requirement for larger clients, posing a medium business risk.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC 2 is a voluntary assurance framework focused on security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy. It is highly relevant for a company providing data-related IT services.

Similar to ISO 27001, not having a SOC 2 report can be a barrier to acquiring enterprise customers, especially those in regulated industries or based in the US, who often require it as proof of security controls.

DORA (source) — Assessment Required

DORA applies indirectly to ICT third-party service providers serving the financial sector. Integrator's client base is not fully disclosed, so it is unclear if they have financial entity customers.

If Integrator serves financial sector clients, it will be subject to contractual flow-down of DORA requirements. Failure to meet these obligations could result in loss of business and contractual liability.

Evidence: https://www.contracthero.com/en/blog/dora-digital-operational-resilience-act, https://www.regulation-dora.eu/blog/dora-third-party-ict-providers-guide-for-suppliers, https://globallawexperts.com/dora-and-ict-service-providers-navigating-the-boundaries-of-applicability/, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/dora/dora-what-is-dora

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 4/10

Integrator A/S is a very small Danish IT consultancy with limited financial resilience due to its scale. Equity stands at only DKK 1.07M and net profit is barely six-digit, meaning a single lost key account or one bad project can turn EBIT negative — as happened in FY2024 when EBIT swung to DKK -416K and equity eroded 32% to DKK 707K. The FY2025 recovery (EBIT of DKK 148K, equity rebuilt to DKK 1.07M) essentially restored the company to FY2023 levels but demonstrates no structural growth. The company benefits from an established niche partner ecosystem (Microsoft BizTalk, Phocas BI, Neuron ESB), over 20 years of team project experience, and credible mid-market Danish reference customers including Kamstrup. However, with only 6–7 employees, key-person dependence on founder Nils Mandrup, vendor concentration on Microsoft integration stack (facing BizTalk end-of-life migration), and headcount trending down from 8 to 6, the business has limited buffers against shocks. Revenue opacity (class-B filer discloses only gross profit) further limits transparency for lenders and analysts.

Key strengths: Recovered profitability in FY2025 after FY2024 loss, Equity restored to pre-loss level (~DKK 1.07M), Established partnerships with Microsoft, Phocas BI, Neuron ESB, Over 20 years of team project experience, Credible mid-market Danish customer base (Kamstrup, Megatrade, Wet Wipe, L.C. Glad), Approved advisor under Danish SMV Digital subsidy scheme

Risk factors: Very small absolute scale — equity only ~DKK 1M, Single lost account can turn EBIT negative (demonstrated in FY2024), Revenue opacity — class-B filer discloses only gross profit, Key-person dependence on founder-manager Nils Mandrup, Vendor concentration on Microsoft BizTalk (facing end-of-life) and Phocas, Headcount trending down: 8 → 7 → 7 → 6, No structural growth over 4-year window

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report