Internap Holding LLC

United States · www.inap.com · 12 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 12 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-06-10 · revision 2

12 direct vendors, 195 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Internap exhibits strong migration readiness, largely driven by its core business offerings and internal capabilities. The company provides 'Evocative Cloud Connect' for direct private connections to leading public clouds (AWS, Azure, GCP), 'Managed IaaS', and 'Professional Services' specifically for 'cloud migrations' and 'infrastructure modernization'. This demonstrates deep expertise and established infrastructure to facilitate complex migrations, particularly towards hybrid cloud environments, which is a key technology focus. The internal adoption of modern networking technologies like SD-WAN and SDN further supports flexible network integration during migration. Their extensive experience with regulatory compliance (SSAE 18 / SOC 1 & SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS) means they are well-equipped to handle the complexities of migrating regulated workloads while maintaining compliance. Vendor relationships, while having an 'Unknown' lock-in risk and a contradictory 'Total Vendors: 0' data point, show good geographic diversity across 6 countries, which can offer flexibility if vendor changes are required during migration. The primary areas where readiness is not explicitly high are the lack of specific data on internal adoption of cloud-native development practices (e.g., containerization, microservices) and the absence of financial stability data to assess funding capacity for large-scale migrations. Data residency requirements are also not specified.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is critical for cloud services and data center providers as it demonstrates security, availability, and confidentiality controls. Evocative provides colocation, managed services, bare metal, and network services - all requiring SOC2 compliance for enterprise customers. Lack of SOC2 certification would significantly impact business competitiveness and customer trust. Most enterprise customers require SOC2 Type II reports from service providers.

Evidence: https://evocative.com/services/

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

As a US-based data center and cloud services provider, Evocative likely processes personal data of EU/EEA residents through customer data, employee data, or business operations. Data center providers commonly serve international clients including EU entities. However, without explicit evidence of EU operations or EU customer data processing, the applicability requires assessment. Non-compliance could result in fines up to 4% of annual turnover, but enforcement likelihood is moderate for US companies without direct EU presence.

Evidence: https://evocative.com/

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is important for data center and managed services providers to demonstrate information security management capabilities. While not legally required, it's often expected by enterprise customers and helps with risk management. The company's focus on security and enterprise services suggests this would be valuable, but absence wouldn't create immediate legal risk - primarily business competitiveness risk.

Evidence: https://evocative.com/services/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 1/10

Internap Holding LLC demonstrates extremely poor financial resilience, evidenced by two Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings within a two-year span (March 2020 and March 2022). The company was severely over-leveraged with approximately $725M of secured debt against revenues of only ~$300M, resulting in debt service consuming essentially all operating cash flow. Even after debt forgiveness in the 2020 restructuring, the operating cash flow could not service the remaining obligations, leading to the second bankruptcy. The company was persistently unprofitable at the operating line, with heavy depreciation, restructuring charges, and goodwill impairments. Book equity went deeply negative (approximately $(150)M+ deficit by 2019). The capital-intensive data center business model, combined with commodity-like pricing pressure from hyperscale cloud providers (AWS/Azure/GCP) and larger rivals (Equinix, Digital Realty), made the business structurally untenable at its scale. Ultimately, the company was broken up and sold piecemeal in 2022: U.S. colocation assets to Evocative, bare-metal/cloud business to HorizonIQ, and international assets to various other buyers. Internap Holding LLC effectively no longer operates as a going concern. This represents a textbook case of a once-prominent Internet-infrastructure company that grew via debt-funded M&A but could not generate sufficient free cash flow to service its debt.

Key strengths: Strategically located, carrier-neutral data centers in tier-1 U.S. metros, Proprietary Performance IP / route-optimization technology (MIRO patent suite), Diversified revenue across colocation, managed hosting, cloud, and network services, Long-tenured enterprise customer relationships with no single customer exceeding 3-5% of revenue

Risk factors: Severely over-leveraged capital structure (~$725M debt vs ~$300M revenue), Commodity-like pricing pressure from hyperscale cloud providers, Capex intensity of data center model with limited scale relative to peers, Declining legacy revenue lines (managed hosting, dedicated servers), Twin bankruptcies in 2020 and 2022 confirming structural weakness, Persistent operating losses with heavy impairments, Deeply negative book equity position

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report