iPlace AB
Sweden · www.iplace.se · 3 vendors
iPlace is a platform designed for the Internet of Things (IoT) and M2M projects. It enables users to monitor, control, and interact with installations, collect and store data from devices, and integrate with external IT systems through APIs. The platform also offers its own optimized hardware devices.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 2
Technology vendors
- GMO GlobalSign K.K. — Technology — Japan
- IDCN AS — Norway
- ITgarden AS — Norway
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 3 sub-vendors.
- DNS Hosting
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 2
3 direct vendors, 35 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Norway: 2
- Japan: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Japan: 2
- Germany: 1
- Poland: 1
Migration Readiness: 2/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
iPlace AB's migration readiness is assessed as low primarily due to the extensive lack of data across crucial areas. The internal technology stack (cloud-native vs. legacy, containerization, microservices) is entirely unknown, making it impossible to gauge the complexity and effort required for any migration. Similarly, financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) is not provided, which impacts the company's ability to fund a migration initiative. The regulatory environment is also unspecified, potentially leading to unforeseen compliance challenges. Data residency requirements are 'Not specified,' which could be an opportunity if there are no strict requirements, but also a risk if these have not been thoroughly investigated. In terms of vendor relationships, the company uses 3 services from vendors based in 2 unique countries (Japan, Norway). While the precise number of distinct vendors is not available, this suggests a relatively small vendor base. The 'Unknown' vendor lock-in risk is a significant concern, as a concentrated vendor base often correlates with higher lock-in, which can complicate and increase the cost of migration efforts.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.