Justitsministeriet

Denmark · owned by Government of Denmark (Denmark) · jm.dk · 34 vendors

The Danish Ministry of Justice is responsible for the administration of justice, law enforcement, and legal affairs in Denmark. It oversees courts, police, prisons, and legal policy development.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-18 · revision 22

34 direct vendors, 322 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Justitsministeriet demonstrates moderate migration readiness, leaning towards the lower end due to significant inherent complexities. A key challenge is the deep integration with and reliance on "Danish Government Digital Infrastructure" (e.g., NemID/MitID, Digitaliseringsstyrelsen shared government infrastructure) and specific government solutions like "HR Manager (Statens Rekrutteringsløsning)." These systems are likely highly customized and tightly coupled, making them difficult to decouple and migrate to new platforms. While Microsoft 365 indicates some familiarity with cloud services, the overall tech stack does not explicitly mention cloud-native architectures, containerization, or microservices, suggesting a mixed environment with potential legacy components. Although "Data Residency Requirements" are not explicitly specified, as a Danish government entity handling sensitive justice and security data, it is highly probable that stringent data residency requirements (e.g., within Denmark or the EU) are in place. These requirements, coupled with strict regulatory compliance (implied by the nature of the organization and the presence of a Data Protection Agency as a product offered), would severely limit cloud migration options and add substantial complexity and cost. While the organization's consistent financial growth provides the means to fund a migration, the technical and regulatory hurdles are considerable. The data states "Total Vendors: 0," which is inconsistent with the 53 services and vendor diversity statistics; however, the lack of specific vendor details prevents a comprehensive assessment of individual vendor lock-in risks, though reliance on national government infrastructure represents a form of ecosystem lock-in.

Compliance

9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Archives Act — Assessment Required

The Danish Archives Act (Arkivloven) applies to all public authorities, mandating the preservation and archiving of records for historical and administrative purposes.

Failure to properly archive documents can lead to the loss of historically significant information and can impede legal and administrative accountability. The risk is moderate as procedures are likely in place but require verification.

Evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Justice_(Denmark), https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justitsministeriet, https://media.unesco.org/sites/default/files/webform/mhm001/denmark_archivesact1035withamendments_2007_entof, https://en.rigsarkivet.dk/services/restricted-access-periods-for-records/, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_National_Archives, https://en.rigsarkivet.dk/services/apply-for-permission-to-see-documents-and-data/

Access to Public Administration Files Act — Compliant

The Act (Offentlighedsloven) applies to all activities carried out by public administration authorities in Denmark, including all ministries.

Failure to provide access to information as required by law can result in legal challenges and accusations of a lack of transparency, damaging public trust. The Ministry is responsible for the law itself, making compliance integral to its function.

Evidence: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/145, https://www.justitsministeriet.dk/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Oversigt.pdf, https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2013/606, https://www.retsinformation.dk/api/pdf/210175, https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offentlighedsloven, https://danskelove.dk/offentlighedsloven

PSI Directive — Assessment Required

This directive, also known as the Open Data Directive, applies to public sector bodies and encourages them to make their information available for re-use. Denmark has implemented it via the PSI Law.

The risk of non-compliance is primarily reputational and relates to missed opportunities for promoting innovation. Financial penalties are less of a concern compared to data protection or cybersecurity frameworks.

Evidence: https://en.digst.dk/policy-and-strategy/open-data-and-re-use-of-public-sector-information/, https://en.digst.dk/digital-governance/data/open-data-and-re-use-of-public-sector-information/, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/public-sector-information-directive, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive_on_the_re-use_of_public_sector_information, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Justice_(Denmark), https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justitsministeriet

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 9/10

Justitsministeriet is a Danish government ministry funded by annual appropriations from the Folketing under § 11 of Finansloven, meaning it carries no market, refinancing, or credit risk. Denmark ran a general government surplus of 2.90% of GDP in 2025, providing a strong sovereign backdrop. The ministry's net operating envelope rose from DKK 20.5B in 2022 to DKK 24.1B in 2025, a cumulative increase of approximately 17.8%, driven by multi-year political agreements covering police, prosecution, prisons, and courts. However, the multi-year budget (BO) shows a programmed step-down after 2025 to DKK 21.3B (2026), DKK 20.9B (2027), and DKK 19.7B (2028), reflecting sun-setting time-limited allocations that will require renewed political agreements to maintain. Cross-government efficiency cuts (rammereduktion) of ~DKK 42M per year add ongoing pressure, and specific operational risks include court case backlogs, large IT investment programs, and small operating deficits at subordinate agencies like Politiklagemyndigheden. Given the sovereign funding base, resilience is very high despite these operational challenges.

Key strengths: Sovereign funding via annual Folketing appropriation - no market or refinancing risk, Danish general government surplus of 2.90% of GDP in 2025, Net operating appropriation grew ~10.6% from 2022 to 2024 and +6.5% to 2025, Multi-year political agreements funding police (2021-2025), prisons (2023-2025), and courts (2024-2027), Structural priority funding secured for prison-officer pay, police IT, and PET initiatives

Risk factors: Programmed budget step-down from DKK 24.1B (2025) to DKK 19.7B (2028) requires renewed political agreements, Recurring cross-government efficiency cuts (rammereduktion) of ~DKK 42M/year, Court case-handling backlogs requiring DKK 420-539M/year through 2027, Operating deficit at Politiklagemyndigheden (DKK -2.4M in 2024), Large IT investment risk on new Straffe- og Skifte court system, Sun-setting of COVID-era and EU presidency time-limited allocations

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report