JoomShaper
Bangladesh · www.joomshaper.com · 6 vendors
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 4
- Financial Resilience: 5
Technology vendors
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- Meta Platforms, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Open Source Matters, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 4 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 6 sub-vendors.
- SP K2 Featured Slider
- SP Page Builder
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-29 · revision 1
6 direct vendors, 129 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 4
- Denmark: 1
- Lithuania: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Germany: 5
- Australia: 3
- Sweden: 3
Migration Readiness: 2/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
JoomShaper demonstrates low migration readiness, primarily due to a very high degree of platform lock-in. Its entire product suite, including SP Page Builder, EasyStore, Joomla Templates, and the Helix Framework, is built specifically for and deeply integrated with the Joomla CMS ecosystem. A migration away from Joomla to a different CMS or a cloud-native architecture would necessitate a complete re-platforming of all core products, representing an extremely costly and time-consuming undertaking. The internal tech stack (Joomla CMS, PHP, MySQL) suggests a traditional, likely monolithic architecture, with no explicit mention of containerization or microservices, which typically complicates cloud migration efforts. The lack of data regarding financial stability makes it impossible to assess the company's capacity to fund such a significant migration. Furthermore, unknown vendor lock-in risks (beyond the inherent platform lock-in) and unspecified regulatory or data residency requirements add layers of uncertainty and potential complexity to any migration strategy. While vendor geographic diversity is present, it does not significantly mitigate the fundamental platform lock-in challenge.
Compliance
7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
GDPR (source) — Assessment Required
JoomShaper is headquartered in Bangladesh (outside EU/EEA) but demonstrably processes personal data of EU/EEA residents at scale. With 791,942+ registered users worldwide and confirmed EU customers (Netherlands, Germany, Latvia, Portugal, and others visible in public testimonials), GDPR's extraterritorial scope under Article 3(2) clearly applies. JoomShaper collects account registration data, payment data, email addresses, and forum activity from EU residents. The Terms of Use explicitly references 'laws of European Union,' acknowledging EU legal obligations. No public evidence of a GDPR-compliant privacy notice meeting Article 13/14 requirements, no Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointment, no Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) for international data transfers, and no EU representative appointment under Article 27 were found. Risk is HIGH because: (1) fines can reach €20M or 4% of global annual turnover; (2) the company processes payment and personal data of a large EU user base; (3) no public compliance documentation was found; (4) as a non-EU company processing EU data, failure to appoint an EU representative is itself a violation; (5) enforcement against non-EU digital service providers has increased significantly since 2021.
Evidence: https://www.joomshaper.com/privacy-policy, https://www.joomshaper.com/terms-of-use, https://www.joomshaper.com/contact, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679
Bangladesh Personal Data Protection Act — Assessment Required
Bangladesh has been developing a Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) for several years. While not yet enacted as of the research date, the draft legislation would impose data protection obligations on Bangladeshi companies similar in structure to GDPR. Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) enactment is anticipated and JoomShaper would be directly subject as a Bangladeshi company; (2) early preparation would reduce compliance costs; (3) the draft includes data localization requirements that could affect JoomShaper's use of international cloud services and payment processors; (4) JoomShaper's large user database (791,942+ users) would make it a significant data controller under any PDPA framework.
Evidence: https://www.joomshaper.com/contact, https://www.joomshaper.com/about
Bangladesh Digital Security Act 2018 — Assessment Required
As a company headquartered in Bangladesh, JoomShaper is subject to Bangladesh's domestic digital and cybersecurity legislation. The Digital Security Act 2018 (DSA) was replaced/amended by the Cyber Security Act 2023 (CSA). These laws govern digital offenses, data security obligations, and online content. Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) JoomShaper operates a large online platform with user-generated content (forums) and payment processing, creating obligations under domestic law; (2) the CSA 2023 includes provisions on unauthorized access, data breaches, and digital fraud relevant to JoomShaper's operations; (3) enforcement is handled by the Bangladesh Cyber Security Agency (BCSA) and Digital Security Agency (DSA); (4) non-compliance could result in criminal penalties for company officers. However, the CSA's primary focus is on content offenses and cybercrime rather than data protection per se, moderating the risk for a software company.
Evidence: https://www.joomshaper.com/contact, https://www.joomshaper.com/about
Financials
Three-year financials
- null:
Financial Resilience Score: 5/10
JoomShaper appears to be a well-established niche software business with a 15+ year track record, a recurring subscription revenue model via annual 'club' pricing plans, and a global customer base of approximately 792,000 registered users across many countries. As a digital-only software distributor, it benefits from low capex and inventory requirements, and its consolidation under the Ollyo parent group provides diversification across both Joomla and WordPress ecosystems, mitigating some platform-concentration risk. However, no public financial statements are available (revenue, EBIT, and equity are all undisclosed), making independent assessment of solvency, leverage, or profitability impossible. The company is private and not listed on any stock exchange. Key structural risks include Joomla's ongoing decline in CMS market share relative to WordPress, small scale (~100+ employees at group level), FX/repatriation risk from Bangladesh's capital controls and taka volatility amid the 2022-2024 FX crisis, and intense competition from free open-source alternatives and larger WordPress-based page builders like Elementor and Divi. The strategic pivot toward WordPress under the Ollyo umbrella is a positive adaptation but signals that the core JoomShaper brand faces long-term platform headwinds.
Key strengths: Established brand with 15+ year track record in Joomla niche, Recurring subscription revenue model via annual club pricing, Product diversification across Joomla and WordPress via Ollyo group, Global customer base of ~792k users reduces single-market exposure, Low-capital digital-only distribution model, 13.6M+ cumulative downloads and 315+ products
Risk factors: Platform dependency on declining Joomla CMS ecosystem, Zero financial transparency - no published accounts, Small scale (~100+ employees group-wide), FX/repatriation risk from Bangladesh capital controls and taka volatility, Competitive pressure from WordPress builders (Elementor, Divi) and free alternatives, Not publicly listed - no external financial oversight
Workforce by country
- Bangladesh: 100
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.