Klima-, Energi- og Forsyningsministeriet (Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities)
Denmark · owned by Government of Denmark (Denmark) · kefm.dk · 27 vendors
The Danish Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities is a government ministry responsible for climate policy, energy policy, and utilities regulation in Denmark. The ministry works on implementing Denmark's climate goals, including the 70% reduction target by 2030, and oversees renewable energy development and energy supply security.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 52
- Digital Resilience: 6
- Financial Resilience: 10
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Talentech — Norway
- UXmail — Technology — Denmark
- and 24 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-18 · revision 22
27 direct vendors, 330 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Norway: 3
- United States: 9
- Sweden: 4
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Denmark: 19
- China: 2
- Unknown: 1
Migration Readiness: 7/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
KEFM exhibits medium-to-high migration readiness. A significant strength is the ministry's strong financial position, with consistent revenue growth, providing the necessary resources to fund migration initiatives. Furthermore, if the provided data 'Total Vendors: 0' is accurate, the complete absence of vendor lock-in is a major enabler, as it removes the complexity and cost associated with disentangling from existing vendor contracts and proprietary technologies during a migration. This would allow for greater agility and choice in adopting new platforms. However, this contradicts the presence of 'Vendor HQ Countries' and 'Vendor Owner Countries' data, suggesting potential uncaptured external relationships. Significant challenges to migration readiness stem from the highly complex regulatory environment, particularly the 'Assessment Required' status for GDPR and NIS2, which will necessitate rigorous compliance planning throughout any migration. Most critically, KEFM faces very strict data residency requirements under Danish and EU law, including national security considerations for sensitive government data. These requirements will severely limit cloud migration options and add considerable complexity, potentially requiring specialized EU/Danish-based cloud solutions or hybrid architectures. The lack of data on the internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-nativeness, containerization) makes it impossible to assess the technical effort required for migration.
Compliance
8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
Danish Climate Act — Compliant
The Danish Climate Act is KEFM's primary legislative mandate. KEFM is the responsible ministry for implementing and reporting on Denmark's legally binding 70% greenhouse gas reduction target by 2030 (relative to 1990 levels) and climate neutrality by 2050. Risk is Medium because: (1) KEFM is the implementing authority, not merely a regulated entity — non-compliance would be a political and governance failure rather than a regulatory penalty; (2) Annual Klimastatus og -fremskrivning (Climate Status and Projection) reports are published, demonstrating active compliance with reporting obligations; (3) Denmark's current trajectory shows a gap between projected emissions reductions and the 70% target, creating political risk.
Evidence: https://www.kefm.dk/klima/klimastatus-og-fremskrivning/klimastatus-og-fremskrivning-2026, https://www.kefm.dk/klima, https://www.klimaraadet.dk
EU Energy Regulation — Assessment Required
KEFM is the Danish competent authority responsible for transposing and implementing EU energy legislation, including the Electricity Directive (2019/944), Gas Directive (2009/73/EC as amended), Renewable Energy Directive (RED III – 2023/2413), Energy Efficiency Directive (EED – 2023/1791), and REPowerEU measures. Risk is Medium because: (1) Denmark has generally been a strong performer in EU energy transition compliance; (2) However, transposition deadlines for RED III and EED 2023 create ongoing compliance obligations; (3) KEFM's role is as the implementing authority, so 'compliance' refers to Denmark's national implementation record rather than KEFM as a regulated entity.
Evidence: https://www.kefm.dk/energi, https://www.kefm.dk/eu-og-globalt-samarbejde, https://en.kefm.dk/energy, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/energy-strategy/national-energy-and-climate-plans-necps_en
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
ISO 27001 is an internationally recognized information security management standard. While not legally mandated for Danish government ministries, it is strongly encouraged by the Danish Agency for Digitisation (Digitaliseringsstyrelsen) and is increasingly adopted across Danish public sector entities. KEFM's role overseeing critical energy and utility infrastructure, combined with NIS2 obligations, creates strong de facto pressure to implement ISO 27001-aligned controls. Risk is Medium because: (1) KEFM relies on Statens It for IT infrastructure — Statens It holds ISO 27001 certification, which partially covers KEFM's IT environment; (2) However, KEFM's own departmental information security management posture is not publicly certified; (3) NIS2 compliance will require security measures substantially equivalent to ISO 27001 controls, making certification strategically important.
Evidence: https://www.kefm.dk/privatlivs-og-cookiepolitik, https://www.kefm.dk/ministeriet, https://www.digst.dk
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2024:
- 2023:
- 2022:
Financial Resilience Score: 10/10
KEFM is a Danish government ministry funded directly by the Danish state, which holds a AAA sovereign credit rating. As such, counterparty and credit risk is effectively zero, and traditional corporate financial metrics such as revenue, EBIT, and equity do not apply. Funding comes via parliamentary appropriation under §29 of the Finanslov (Danish Finance Act), and expenditure is tracked against that appropriation with outturn reported in Statsregnskabet. The ministry benefits from strong political tailwinds: climate is a durable multi-party priority in Denmark, and the Klimaloven (2020) legally binds a 70% emissions reduction by 2030, ensuring a rising funding trajectory. Appropriations under §29 have grown materially from 2022 through 2024, driven by green-transition packages, energy-crisis measures following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, CCS/CCUS funding, Energy Islands, offshore wind, biogas support, and district-heating conversion programmes. Key risks include political re-organisation risk (KEFM has been restructured multiple times since 2007), execution risk on major programmes such as Energy Island Bornholm and CCS tenders, and reliance on EU frameworks (ETS revenues, RePowerEU flows, CBAM implementation) where Brussels-level slippage can affect programme spend. Overall, however, sovereign funding and legally-binding climate targets give KEFM exceptional financial resilience.
Key strengths: Sovereign funding from AAA-rated Danish state, Legally binding 70% emissions reduction target by 2030 (Klimaloven 2020), Durable multi-party political support for climate agenda, Growing portfolio with earmarked pots for CCS/CCUS, Energy Islands, biogas, and district heating, Rising §29 appropriations from 2022 to 2024
Risk factors: Political re-organisation risk — ministerial structures periodically re-scoped after elections, Execution risk on major programmes (Energy Island Bornholm, CCS tenders, offshore-wind rounds), Reliance on EU frameworks (ETS, RePowerEU, CBAM) subject to Brussels-level delays, Budget re-profiling risk from delays in policy implementation
Revenue by geography
- Denmark: 100%
Revenue by product/service
- Energy (Energi): 55%
- Climate (Klima): 30%
- Utilities / Forsyning: 10%
- Cross-cutting (EU & global): 5%
Workforce by country
- Denmark: 300
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.