Knock Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Knock: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

United States · knock.app · 20 vendors

Knock Labs, Inc. provides an API-based notification infrastructure platform for businesses. It offers developers and product teams tools to build and scale customized, multi-channel notifications for their applications, including in-app, email, push, and chat. The platform aims to simplify notification management and improve user engagement and retention.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 20 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-04-21 · revision 3

20 direct vendors, 155 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

HIPAA (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://docs.knock.app/security

SOC 2 (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://docs.knock.app/security

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Knock demonstrates meaningful product-market fit signals — a credible roster of well-known tech customers (Vercel, Webflow, Medium, Amplitude, Clay), enterprise compliance certifications (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA), and an operational claim of hundreds of millions of messages per month. Its developer-led freemium GTM model is capital-efficient and proven in B2B SaaS, and its usage-based pricing creates natural revenue expansion as customers grow. The 2025 AI-native pivot (AI agent credits, Claude/Cursor integration) is strategically well-timed and positions the company at the intersection of two high-growth trends. However, from a financial due diligence standpoint, Knock is essentially a black box. No revenue, EBIT, equity, burn rate, or runway data is publicly available. The company has raised an estimated $14–15 million in total funding, primarily a $12 million Series A in 2022, and as a venture-backed startup it is almost certainly not yet profitable. If no additional capital has been raised since 2022, runway may be a material concern depending on growth trajectory and burn rate. The competitive landscape presents further risk: Knock competes against well-funded incumbents including Braze, Iterable, OneSignal, Courier, and Novu (open-source), as well as large platforms like Salesforce Marketing Cloud and HubSpot. Its orchestration-only model (customers still pay separately for Postmark, Twilio, SendGrid) represents a potentially thinner moat if downstream providers build competing orchestration layers. Customer concentration in the US tech sector also creates cyclical exposure. The overall resilience score of 5 reflects a balanced but uncertain picture: strong qualitative signals of product-market fit and a sound business model, offset by complete financial opacity, a competitive market, likely ongoing cash burn, and dependence on continued venture funding in a tightened capital environment.

Key strengths: Strong brand-name customer roster including Vercel, Webflow, Medium, Amplitude, and Clay, Developer-led freemium GTM model reduces customer acquisition cost and enables bottom-up growth, Usage-based pricing creates natural revenue expansion aligned with customer growth, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and CCPA compliance certifications support enterprise sales cycles, Claims 99.99% uptime and hundreds of millions of messages per month — meaningful operational scale, AI-native positioning in 2025 aligns with high-growth trends in developer tooling and AI automation, Multi-language SDK support (Node, Python, Ruby, Go, Java, .NET, Elixir, PHP) broadens addressable market, Series A of $12M led by Craft Ventures signals institutional investor validation

Risk factors: Complete absence of public financials — burn rate, runway, profitability, and cash position are unknown, Almost certainly not yet profitable as a Series A venture-backed startup, Total funding of ~$14–15M is modest; if no additional capital raised since 2022 Series A, runway may be a concern, Competes against well-funded incumbents: Braze, Iterable, OneSignal, Courier, Novu, Salesforce Marketing Cloud, HubSpot, Orchestration-only model (customers pay separately for Twilio, SendGrid, Postmark) represents a potentially thin moat, Customer concentration in US tech sector creates cyclical exposure to tech spending downturns, Small team (estimated 20–50 employees) creates scaling and key-person risk, 2022–2024 venture capital tightening may have impacted ability to raise follow-on funding

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report