Kontainer

Denmark · owned by SANDBERG BENTEL HOLDING ApS (Denmark) · www.kontainer.com · 14 vendors

Kontainer is a leading provider of Digital Asset Management (DAM) and Product Information Management (PIM) solutions. The company helps businesses organize, manage, and share digital assets and product information securely and efficiently. They offer features such as advanced search, integrations with other systems, and automated workflows to simplify tasks and improve efficiency.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 14 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

14 direct vendors, 191 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Kontainer exhibits good migration readiness, primarily driven by its modern microservices architecture and extensive use of APIs (RESTful API, OAuth 2.0, SAML/SSO, Swagger/OpenAPI). These architectural choices facilitate modular migration and integration with new platforms. The company's existing strong regulatory compliance (ISO 27001, ISAE 3402, SOC 2, NIS2, GDPR-compliant data management) means they have established processes for handling sensitive data and regulatory requirements, which is a significant advantage for ensuring compliance during a migration. While Kontainer operates on a "Private Cloud (EU-based, 3 data centers)," indicating experience with cloud infrastructure, a migration to a public cloud environment might require more effort compared to a company already leveraging public cloud-native services. The absence of explicit mention of containerization technologies (like Docker or Kubernetes) suggests this might be an area for development to further streamline cloud migration. Data residency requirements are not specified, but their EU-based operations and GDPR compliance suggest a strong understanding and capability to manage such constraints. Regarding vendor relationships, the data presents a contradiction: "Total Vendors: 0" is stated, yet "Total Services: 30" and "Vendor Geographic Diversity: 8 unique countries" are also provided. If we assume there are vendors providing these 30 services, the geographic diversity across 8 countries (United States, France, Sweden, Poland, India, Denmark, Netherlands, Australia) would generally reduce vendor concentration risk and simplify migration compared to a highly concentrated vendor base. However, the "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is explicitly unknown, which remains a potential challenge. The lack of financial stability data also means the ability to fund a significant migration effort cannot be fully assessed. Overall, the modern architecture and compliance posture position Kontainer well for migration, despite some unknowns and potential areas for optimization.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

NIS2 (source) — Compliant

Company explicitly states NIS2 compliance on their security page. As a digital service provider in the EU with significant operations (350+ clients, substantial infrastructure), they likely qualify as an Important Entity under NIS2. Low risk due to documented compliance and existing security infrastructure.

Evidence: https://kontainer.com/security-and-backup

ISAE 3000 (source) — Compliant

Company holds ISAE 3402 certification (which is based on ISAE 3000 framework) with annual audits by PwC. As a service organization providing assurance to clients, this is highly relevant. Low risk due to active certification and annual renewals.

Evidence: https://kontainer.com/security-and-backup

SOC 2 (source) — Compliant

Company explicitly states SOC2 compliance on their security page. As a cloud service provider handling customer data, SOC2 is highly relevant. Low risk due to documented compliance and comprehensive security controls already in place.

Evidence: https://kontainer.com/security-and-backup

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: null/10

The research report provided does not contain any extracted financial data for Kontainer (CVR: 38683268). While the CVR number was identified and multiple Danish official sources were consulted, no actual financial figures, income statement data, balance sheet data, or operational metrics were successfully retrieved or disclosed in the report. As a small private Danish company, Kontainer may have limited public disclosure obligations, and the research process did not yield quantifiable financial results sufficient to assess resilience. A meaningful financial resilience score cannot be assigned without at least revenue, profitability, or equity data. Further direct lookup via the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen) or Regnskab.dk using CVR 38683268 would be required to complete this assessment.

Key strengths: CVR number identified as 38683268, enabling future direct registry lookup, Company is registered in Denmark, subject to Danish financial reporting standards, Small private company status likely limits mandatory public financial disclosure

Risk factors: No financial data was successfully extracted, preventing any quantitative risk assessment, Limited public disclosure typical of small Danish private companies increases opacity, Inability to verify revenue, profitability, or solvency from available sources

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report