Liquid Web, LLC

United States · www.liquidweb.com · 33 vendors

Liquid Web, LLC is a managed web hosting and cloud hosting provider headquartered in Lansing, Michigan. The company specializes in high-performance hosting solutions, including dedicated servers, cloud hosting, and VPS hosting, for small to mid-sized businesses. They also offer managed applications for platforms like WordPress, WooCommerce, and Magento, emphasizing reliability, speed, security, and expert support.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 33 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-14 · revision 2

33 direct vendors, 301 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Liquid Web's migration readiness is moderate. While the company possesses strong technical capabilities and expertise in managing complex, high-performance environments, its core business model is rooted in traditional infrastructure hosting, primarily dedicated servers and VPS. This model, while robust, is less inherently cloud-native compared to architectures built on microservices or containers, suggesting that a significant migration to a public cloud environment would likely require substantial re-architecture and re-platforming efforts. The reliance on specific hypervisors (VMware) and traditional control panels (cPanel, Plesk, InterWorx) could introduce complexity and potential lock-in when considering a move to different cloud platforms with their own native services. Furthermore, the stringent compliance requirements (HIPAA, PCI-DSS, SOC 2/SOC 3, GDPR) that Liquid Web adheres to, while a strength for resilience, add significant complexity and cost to any migration, as the target environment must also meet these high standards. The assessment is also hampered by the lack of data on specific data residency requirements, financial stability (which impacts the ability to fund a large-scale migration), and the 'Unknown' status of vendor lock-in risk, which could be a significant impediment. However, Liquid Web's experience with virtualization (Cloud Dedicated via VMware), global operational presence, and a strong internal technical team (implied by Signature Services and Hosting for Agencies) provide foundational strengths and expertise that could be leveraged for a successful, albeit complex, migration.

Compliance

11 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

CPRA — Compliant

Liquid Web's Privacy Policy includes a comprehensive and detailed 'Notice to California Residents' section that addresses all key CCPA/CPRA requirements: right to know, right to correct, right to delete, Shine the Light disclosure, categories of personal information collected, business purposes, sources, and a dedicated CCPA rights request portal. The company explicitly states it does not sell personal information for monetary consideration and does not process sensitive personal information beyond service provision. Risk is Low because: (1) the company has implemented documented CCPA/CPRA compliance mechanisms; (2) it explicitly disclaims selling personal data; (3) it provides a dedicated rights request mechanism; (4) the Privacy Policy was updated as recently as June 18, 2026, indicating active maintenance.

Evidence: https://www.liquidweb.com/policies/privacy-policy/, https://www.liquidweb.com/policies/ccpa/

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

No ISO 27001 certification is referenced or displayed on Liquid Web's public-facing website, privacy policy, or data centers page. The company displays SSAE-16, AICPA SOC, HIPAA, and other compliance logos but ISO 27001 is notably absent. For a managed hosting provider of Liquid Web's scale (28+ years, 500,000+ deployments, global data centers), ISO 27001 certification would be expected and is commonly required by enterprise customers in regulated industries. The absence of any public reference to ISO 27001 suggests either: (a) the company does not hold ISO 27001 certification, or (b) it holds certification but does not prominently publicize it. Risk is Medium because: (1) ISO 27001 is not legally mandated for US hosting providers; (2) its absence may create competitive disadvantage with enterprise customers; (3) the company's SSAE-16/SOC audit engagement provides some information security assurance as an alternative framework.

Evidence: https://www.liquidweb.com/, https://www.liquidweb.com/data-centers/, https://www.liquidweb.com/policies/security-and-trust/

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 is an international assurance standard used primarily for non-financial assurance engagements, including sustainability reporting, data privacy attestations, and cybersecurity assessments. It is the international equivalent framework to SSAE 18 (used in the US for SOC reports). Liquid Web's SSAE-16/SOC audit engagement is conducted under US GAAS/AICPA standards rather than ISAE 3000. As a US-headquartered company primarily serving US and international markets, ISAE 3000 reporting is not a standard regulatory requirement. However, for EU-based customers or those requiring internationally recognized assurance reports, ISAE 3000-based reports (such as ISAE 3402 for service organizations) may be requested. Risk is Low because: (1) ISAE 3000 is not legally mandated; (2) the company's existing SSAE-16/SOC framework provides equivalent assurance for most customers; (3) no evidence of customer demand for ISAE 3000 specifically is found.

Evidence: https://www.liquidweb.com/, https://www.liquidweb.com/data-centers/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Liquid Web, LLC is a mature, privately-held managed hosting company with a 28+ year operating history and backing from two successive top-tier private equity sponsors (Madison Dearborn Partners in 2015 and Siris Capital Group in 2022). This PE ownership pattern typically implies solid underlying cash flows and enterprise value in the hundreds of millions, and the company operates in a high-margin niche of managed hosting for mission-critical workloads (WooCommerce, Magento, WordPress at scale) that commands premium pricing versus commodity hosting. Diversification across Liquid Web (managed hosting), Nexcess (managed applications), Servers.com (bare-metal/global infrastructure), and StellarWP (WordPress software plugins) creates recurring revenue streams across both hosting and SaaS-style software. However, the resilience score is tempered by several structural risks. PE ownership typically involves a leveraged capital structure, which increases interest expense sensitivity in a higher-rate environment. The company faces intense competition from hyperscalers (AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure) and mid-market managed hosts (Rackspace, DigitalOcean, GoDaddy, WP Engine, Kinsta), and commoditization of dedicated server and VPS hosting has pressured industry pricing for years. Concentration in the WordPress ecosystem also creates strategic risk. The complete lack of public financial transparency further limits confidence in the assessment.

Key strengths: 28+ year operating history in mature, cash-generative managed hosting segment, Backed by two successive top-tier private equity sponsors (Madison Dearborn 2015; Siris Capital 2022), Diversified brand portfolio: Liquid Web, Nexcess, Servers.com, StellarWP, High-margin niche: managed hosting for mission-critical workloads (WooCommerce, Magento, WordPress at scale), Strong SLAs (99.99% uptime) and compliance certifications (HIPAA, SOC, SSAE-16) support customer stickiness, Aggressive M&A roll-up strategy (Nexcess 2019, iThemes 2020, StellarWP plugins 2021)

Risk factors: Intense competition from hyperscalers (AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure) and managed hosts (Rackspace, DigitalOcean, WP Engine, Kinsta), Commoditization of dedicated server and VPS hosting has pressured industry pricing, PE ownership implies leveraged capital structure with interest expense sensitivity in higher-rate environment, Concentration in WordPress ecosystem creates strategic risk from platform shifts, No public transparency; limited visibility into liquidity or covenant compliance, No verified financial figures available for FY 2022-2024

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report