Liveblocks Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Liveblocks: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

United States · liveblocks.io · 13 vendors

Liveblocks, Inc. provides an API platform and ready-made features for developers to build real-time collaboration into their applications. These features include live presence, cursors, multiplayer editing, comments, notifications, and AI copilots, enabling human and AI collaboration. The company aims to help product teams create engaging, multiplayer, and AI-ready applications.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

4 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 13 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-21 · revision 1

13 direct vendors, 147 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

HIPAA (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://liveblocks.io/security

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

GDPR (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://liveblocks.io/dpa, https://liveblocks.io/privacy

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Liveblocks is a small, capital-efficient private U.S. startup that has raised approximately $6.4M cumulatively since its founding in 2021. The company exhibits strong qualitative signals of product-market fit, with a customer base including teams building products comparable to Figma, Notion, Linear, and Canva. Its usage-based subscription pricing model mirrors that of successful infrastructure businesses like Twilio, Stripe, and Auth0, suggesting high gross margins are likely. The technical moat is meaningful, with a CRDT engine, global edge network, and SOC 2/HIPAA compliance broadening its enterprise reach. However, financial resilience is constrained by the modest absolute capital raised relative to many infra startups, lack of public disclosure on revenue, burn rate, or cash position, and a small team (estimated 10–20 people) which creates key-person risk. The company faces competition from both direct rivals (Ably, Pusher, PubNub, Stream, Convex, Partykit, Supabase Realtime) and indirect threats from open-source alternatives (Yjs, Automerge). Its dependence on the SaaS/developer end-market exposes it to tech-sector hiring and spending cycles. Without audited financials, counterparties cannot independently verify financial health, and a Series A/B may be needed in the near term to scale go-to-market. Overall, the company appears technically credible and capital-efficient but operates at small scale with limited visibility into runway.

Key strengths: Cumulative capital raised of $6.4M since 2021 indicates capital efficiency, Strong product-market fit with marquee SaaS customer references, Usage-based subscription pricing model typical of high-margin infrastructure businesses, Defensible technical moat (CRDT engine, edge network, SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance), Positioning into AI agent collaboration trend (AI Copilots product line), 100% remote operating model reducing fixed costs

Risk factors: Only ~$6.4M raised limits runway visibility and may require near-term Series A/B, No public disclosure of revenue, EBIT, equity, or cash position, Concentration on developer/SaaS end-market sensitive to tech-sector cycles, Intense competition from Ably, Pusher, PubNub, Stream, Convex, Partykit, Supabase Realtime, Indirect competition from open-source alternatives (Yjs, Automerge), Small team (~10–20 people) creates key-person risk on founders and core engineers, No audited financials limits enterprise buyer verification, Pricing pressure from AI commoditization enabling customers to build in-house

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report