Maersk Tankers A/S

Denmark · owned by A.P. MØLLER OG HUSTRU CHASTINE MC-KINNEY MØLLERS FOND TIL ALMENE FORMAAL (Denmark) · maersktankers.com · 36 vendors

Maersk Tankers A/S is a Copenhagen-based service company that operates one of the largest tanker fleets in the world through direct ownership and commercial management solutions for shipowners. The company offers energy transport, pool management, and voyage management services aimed at maximising vessels' economic and environmental performance. It employs approximately 300 people across offices in Denmark, Singapore, India, the UK, and the US.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 34

36 direct vendors, 362 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Maersk Tankers exhibits low migration readiness due to a confluence of significant challenges. The most prominent is the highly complex and uncertain regulatory landscape, with numerous 'High' and 'Medium' risk regulations (NIS2, GDPR, UK GDPR, PDPA Singapore, DPDPA India, MARPOL, EU ETS, OFAC) requiring ongoing assessment and compliance. Any large-scale migration, especially involving data or system changes, would necessitate meticulous re-evaluation against these diverse and often stringent requirements, particularly concerning cross-border data transfers and cybersecurity. Compounding this is an extremely complex multi-jurisdictional data residency environment across Denmark, UK, USA, India, and Singapore. The potential for data localization requirements under India's DPDPA 2023, coupled with the need for various transfer mechanisms (SCCs, UK IDTAs, DPF reliance) for other regions, creates substantial hurdles for moving data or systems to new cloud environments or service providers. Furthermore, the company's reliance on major enterprise systems like SAP (ERP) and Salesforce (CRM) implies significant vendor lock-in. Migrating away from or substantially re-platforming these core systems would be a complex, costly, and time-consuming undertaking due to deep integrations and data dependencies. While the existing adoption of Microsoft Azure provides a foundation for further cloud migration and the use of modern frontend (Next.js) and headless CMS (Contentful) indicates capacity for modern development, the overall complexity stemming from regulatory, data residency, and enterprise vendor relationships significantly lowers the company's immediate migration readiness.

Compliance

13 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

EU Anti-Money Laundering — Assessment Required

The EU's Anti-Money Laundering framework (6th AMLD and the new EU AML Regulation 2024/1624) applies to obliged entities including certain financial services and high-value goods traders. While shipping companies are not typically 'obliged entities' under AML law, Maersk Tankers' role in energy commodity trading, pool management (handling large financial flows), and international transactions creates AML risk exposure. The tanker industry is recognized as a high-risk sector for trade-based money laundering (TBML). Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) the company is not a traditional AML obliged entity; (2) however, TBML through commodity shipping is a recognized typology; (3) the company's US operations trigger FinCEN/BSA considerations; (4) pool management involves significant financial flows between international parties.

Evidence: https://maersktankers.com/about, https://assets.ctfassets.net/bo1ey0o7gnnb/4bBFsDiLLvZPfBjnJq56ey/183b994edf69d91db4454aac89b70d5c/2026_Maersk_Tankers_Third_Party_Code_of_Conduct.pdf

EU Whistleblower Protection Directive — Partially Compliant

The EU Whistleblower Protection Directive (2019/1937), transposed in Denmark by the Whistleblower Protection Act (Lov om beskyttelse af whistleblowere, effective December 2021), requires companies with 50+ employees to establish internal whistleblower reporting channels. Maersk Tankers (~250 employees) clearly meets the threshold. Risk is LOW because the company has demonstrably implemented a whistleblower system (EthicsPoint by NAVEX Global, accessible at secure.ethicspoint.eu), indicating active compliance. Status is 'Partially Compliant' because while the channel exists, the completeness of the program (follow-up procedures, confidentiality protections, anti-retaliation measures) cannot be fully verified from public sources.

Evidence: https://maersktankers.com, https://secure.ethicspoint.eu/domain/media/en/gui/104642/index.html

UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 — Compliant

The UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 requires commercial organizations with annual turnover of £36M+ and doing business in the UK to publish an annual Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement. Maersk Tankers has a UK office (London) and publishes a Modern Slavery Statement (June 2026), demonstrating active compliance. Risk is LOW because the company is demonstrably meeting the publication requirement. The maritime industry has elevated modern slavery risk due to seafarer exploitation, but Maersk Tankers transferred technical management (and thus direct seafarer employment) to Synergy Group in 2021.

Evidence: https://maersktankers.com/files/June2026_Slavery_Act.pdf, https://maersktankers.com

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

Maersk Tankers A/S benefits from exceptionally strong ownership by A.P. Moller Holding A/S, a well-capitalised long-term industrial owner providing balance-sheet resilience and access to capital for fleet renewal. The company's 2021 shift to an asset-light service model — outsourcing technical management to Synergy Group — means most vessel operating costs and liabilities sit with pool partners rather than on Maersk Tankers' own balance sheet, resulting in a more stable margin profile weighted toward commercial fees, pool management fees and voyage-management services. The company enjoys significant scale as one of the largest independent commercial pool operators globally in product tankers, giving it pricing power, cargo relationships and data advantages. Strong tanker market conditions in 2022-2024 driven by Russia-Ukraine trade dislocation have supported profitability. Strategic diversification into gas/clean ammonia through the VLAC order book and the 2024 Penfield Marine acquisition further strengthen the franchise. However, specific audited financial figures for FY2022-FY2024 could not be verified in this session, limiting precision of the assessment. Risks include cyclical shipping market exposure, concentration in product tankers, significant newbuild capex commitments for up to 10 VLACs, geopolitical/sanctions risk, and reliance on Synergy Group for technical management.

Key strengths: Ownership by A.P. Moller Holding A/S, a well-capitalised long-term industrial owner, Asset-light service model since 2021 with technical management outsourced to Synergy Group, One of the largest independent commercial pool operators globally in product tankers, Strategic diversification into gas/clean ammonia via VLAC order book, 2024 Penfield Marine acquisition broadens crude exposure and US customer base, Strong product-tanker market conditions in 2022-2024

Risk factors: Cyclical shipping market exposure with fee income tied to spot-market TCE earnings, Concentration in product tankers (MR and LR segments), Significant newbuild capex commitment for up to 10 VLACs with first delivery 2026, Geopolitical/sanctions risk from Russian oil restrictions and Red Sea disruptions, Reliance on Synergy Group for technical/crew management creates counterparty dependency, Emergence of not-yet-mature clean-ammonia shipping trade

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report