Mapme

Israel · mapme.com · 8 vendors

Mapme is an interactive map creation platform that enables companies and organizations to build and share engaging visual stories and geographic information. It allows users to create stunning, customizable interactive maps without requiring coding or GIS expertise, supporting various industries and use cases.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 8 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-04-16 · revision 2

8 direct vendors, 161 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Mapme's migration readiness is moderate, characterized by a mixed technology stack and significant data gaps that hinder a comprehensive assessment. The presence of WordPress in the internal tech stack suggests potential legacy components that could complicate migration to modern cloud-native or microservices architectures. While the company utilizes a REST API and AI/ML, indicating some modern capabilities, there is no explicit mention of containerization or cloud-native design, which are key enablers for seamless migration. Mapme's reliance on various integrations (Google Sheets, Salesforce CRM, JotForm/Google Forms, Matterport 3D) introduces dependencies that could lead to complexity and potential lock-in to those platforms during a migration effort. A critical challenge is the absence of data regarding financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history), making it impossible to assess Mapme's capacity to fund a substantial migration project. Furthermore, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly unknown, which is a significant factor in determining migration flexibility. On the positive side, the lack of specified data residency requirements could simplify regulatory compliance during migration. If the 'Total Vendors: 0' entry is taken literally, it would imply minimal direct vendor lock-in from external service providers, though the platform integrations still represent dependencies.

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

High risk due to severe financial penalties (up to 4% of global annual revenue or €20M), reputational damage, and business disruption. As a SaaS platform serving global customers including EU residents, GDPR compliance is critical. The company processes personal data from users and their end-users, making non-compliance highly likely to result in regulatory action.

Evidence: https://mapme.com/privacy-policy/

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

Medium risk due to customer trust and competitive requirements. As a SaaS platform handling customer data and serving enterprise clients (JLL, Compass, Amnesty International), SOC2 compliance is increasingly expected by customers. Non-compliance could result in lost business opportunities and reduced customer confidence, though not direct regulatory penalties.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

Medium risk as ISO 27001 certification would enhance security posture and customer confidence. While not legally required, it's increasingly expected by enterprise customers for SaaS providers. Non-compliance represents missed business opportunities and potential security vulnerabilities, though no direct regulatory penalties.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Mapme operates a SaaS subscription model with tiered pricing, which is structurally well-suited to generating predictable, recurring revenue with strong gross margins typical of software businesses. The company has been operational for approximately 10 years since its 2015 founding without any publicly observable distress event, suggesting a baseline level of financial sustainability. Its diversified customer base spanning real estate, NGOs, government, education, retail, tourism, construction, and media reduces single-sector concentration risk, and notable institutional clients such as Compass, JLL, Amnesty International, and Texas Tech University lend credibility to its market position. The platform's low capital intensity as a software business further supports the potential for cash generation at scale. However, the complete absence of any public financial disclosure — no revenue, no profitability metrics, no funding history, and no equity data — makes it impossible to verify actual financial health. The company has no disclosed venture capital or private equity backing, and it is unclear whether it is profitably bootstrapped or operating on limited reserves. This opacity represents a significant due diligence risk for any counterparty and prevents a higher resilience score from being assigned with confidence. Competitive risks are material: Mapme operates in a crowded market against well-funded and even free alternatives including Google My Maps, Esri ArcGIS, Felt, and Proxi. Competing against a free Google product is a structural challenge that could compress pricing power and limit user conversion from free tiers. The company's estimated small headcount (10–50 employees) may constrain its capacity to invest in product development and sales at the pace required to maintain competitive differentiation. Geopolitical risk associated with Israel-based operations and R&D, combined with unknown capital reserves and an unverified funding position, introduces additional uncertainty. The score of 5 reflects a company with a sound business model and demonstrated longevity, offset by complete financial opacity and meaningful competitive and operational risks.

Key strengths: SaaS subscription model providing structurally recurring revenue and high gross margin potential, Approximately 10 years of continuous operation since 2015 without observable distress, Diversified customer base across real estate, NGOs, government, education, retail, tourism, construction, and media, Notable institutional clients including Compass, JLL, Amnesty International, Texas Tech University, and ACT Government Australia, 100,000+ interactive maps created milestone indicating meaningful user adoption, Low capital intensity as a software platform supporting potential cash generation, Ancillary professional services revenue stream providing modest diversification beyond subscriptions

Risk factors: Complete absence of public financial disclosure — no revenue, EBIT, equity, or cash position verifiable, No publicly disclosed funding rounds; unknown whether bootstrapped profitably or operating on limited reserves, Competes against free Google My Maps and well-funded alternatives including Esri ArcGIS, Felt, and Proxi, Estimated small team of 10–50 employees limiting product development and sales investment capacity, Geopolitical and talent-market risks from Israel-concentrated R&D and operations, Freemium entry point risks compressing conversion rates and average revenue per user, Unknown debt levels, cash runway, and equity position prevent assessment of downside resilience

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report