Maze
France · maze.co · 24 vendors
Maze is a product discovery and user research platform that empowers product, design, and marketing teams to gather actionable user insights. It enables rapid quantitative user testing of prototypes and live products, helping teams validate ideas and make data-driven decisions. The platform aims to democratize the user research process, making it accessible and efficient for various teams.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 8
- Digital Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- EasyDMARC Inc. — Cybersecurity — United States
- Mux — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 21 more
Services catalogue
3 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 24 sub-vendors.
- Customer Communications and Engagement Automation Platform
- Lagoon
- User Testing
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-18 · revision 1
24 direct vendors, 248 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Italy: 1
- Poland: 1
- India: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- UK: 1
- Italy: 1
- Serbia: 1
Migration Readiness: 8/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Maze exhibits high migration readiness primarily due to its highly modern and cloud-native internal tech stack. The use of Amazon Web Services (AWS), a Microservices Architecture, Infrastructure as Code (IaC), and a Continuous Deployment Pipeline indicates a modular, automated, and scalable environment that is well-suited for migration. The existing SOC 2 Type II and GDPR-compliant data infrastructure suggests mature processes and controls for data handling, which would facilitate a compliant migration. The absence of specified data residency requirements also offers greater flexibility in migration strategies. However, significant challenges and unknowns exist. There is no available data on financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history), making it impossible to assess the company's capacity to fund a substantial migration effort. Furthermore, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown, and while there is geographic diversity among vendor HQs/owners for the 29 services, the actual number of vendors is not explicitly stated (contradictory 'Total Vendors: 0' data). If these 29 services are concentrated among a few vendors, this could lead to high vendor lock-in, increasing the complexity and cost of any migration initiatives.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.