McDuck Advisory & Management ApS

Denmark · owned by McDuck Enterprises ApS (Denmark) · mcduck.dk · 7 vendors

McDuck Advisory & Management ApS is a Danish private limited company (ApS) operating in the advisory and management space. The company's website is currently under maintenance, limiting publicly available details about its specific services. Based on its name, it likely provides consulting, advisory, and management services to businesses or individuals.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

7 direct vendors, 122 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 2/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

McDuck Advisory & Management ApS demonstrates low migration readiness. The internal tech stack, "WordPress," is typically a monolithic application and not inherently cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based. This indicates that a migration to modern cloud infrastructure would likely require substantial re-architecture and development effort, increasing complexity, cost, and time. There is no data available on the company's financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history), making it impossible to assess its capacity to fund a potentially significant migration project. Furthermore, the "Regulatory Environment" and "Data Residency Requirements" are not specified, which could introduce unforeseen compliance challenges and costs during migration. Regarding vendor relationships, the data is ambiguous: "Total Vendors: 0" is stated, but "Total Services: 10" and diverse vendor geographies are also listed. This makes it difficult to assess potential vendor-related migration complexities and lock-in risks. If the 10 services are from a few vendors, this could imply high lock-in, increasing migration difficulty. The lack of clarity on vendor lock-in, combined with the legacy-leaning tech stack and significant data gaps, places the company in the low readiness category.

Compliance

11 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC 2 is a voluntary framework (not a legal requirement) developed by the AICPA, primarily relevant for technology and cloud service providers. For a financial advisory firm, SOC 2 is not legally mandated but may be commercially required by institutional clients, counterparties, or as part of vendor due diligence. Risk is Medium because: (1) institutional clients in financial services increasingly require SOC 2 Type II reports from service providers; (2) absence of SOC 2 may limit business development with certain counterparties; (3) the framework aligns well with DORA and NIS2 ICT risk management requirements.

Evidence: https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/soc-2, https://us.aicpa.org/interestareas/frc/assuranceadvisoryservices/aicpasoc2report

AIFMD — Assessment Required

If McDuck Advisory & Management ApS manages alternative investment funds (hedge funds, private equity, real estate funds, etc.), AIFMD authorization or registration with Finanstilsynet is mandatory. Risk is Medium rather than High because applicability depends on the specific business model, which is unconfirmed. However, the 'Management' component of the company name suggests possible fund management activities. Non-compliance with AIFMD carries significant regulatory and reputational risk.

Evidence: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32011L0061, https://www.finanstilsynet.dk/en/Supervision/Companies-under-supervision, https://www.esma.europa.eu/policy-rules/alternative-investment-fund-managers-aifmd

Danish Financial Business Act — Assessment Required

The Danish Financial Business Act is the primary domestic legislation governing financial firms in Denmark, implementing EU financial directives (MiFID II, CRD, Solvency II, etc.) into Danish law. All financial services firms operating in Denmark must comply. Risk is High because: (1) it is the foundational licensing and conduct-of-business law for Danish financial firms; (2) Finanstilsynet actively supervises and enforces compliance; (3) non-compliance can result in license revocation, fines, and criminal prosecution of management.

Evidence: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2022/406, https://www.finanstilsynet.dk/en, https://www.finanstilsynet.dk/en/Supervision/Companies-under-supervision

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report