Ministeriet for Natur og Dyrevelfærd (formerly Ministeriet for Grøn Trepart)

Denmark · owned by Government of Denmark (Denmark) · mgtp.dk · 7 vendors

Ministeriet for Natur og Dyrevelfærd (Ministry for Nature and Animal Welfare), formerly known as Ministeriet for Grøn Trepart (Ministry for the Green Tripartite), is a Danish government ministry headquartered in Copenhagen. It is responsible for nature policy, animal welfare, and overseeing the landmark 'Green Tripartite' agreement aimed at securing more nature, cleaner water, and a sustainable transition of Danish agriculture. The ministry oversees agencies including Naturstyrelsen (the Nature Agency) and Styrelsen for Grøn Arealomlægning og Vandmiljø.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-18 · revision 2

7 direct vendors, 118 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

The company exhibits medium migration readiness, leaning towards the lower end. A primary challenge is the lack of detailed information regarding the internal tech stack ('Internal Tech Stack: []'). Without insights into cloud-native adoption, containerization, or microservices, it is assumed the IT landscape may be traditional, which typically increases the complexity, time, and cost associated with migration efforts. The stringent regulatory environment, including GDPR and NIS2 compliance, coupled with likely data residency requirements within the EU/Denmark, imposes significant constraints and planning overhead for any migration, particularly concerning data handling and security. Regarding vendor relationships, the data presents a contradiction with 'Total Vendors: 0' versus 'Vendor HQ Countries: Denmark, United States' and 'Total Services: 8'. Assuming there are vendors for the 8 services, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown' is a critical impediment. Without knowing the number of vendors or the specifics of their contracts, assessing the ease of disentanglement and potential costs during a migration is difficult. A high degree of vendor lock-in, if present, would significantly reduce migration flexibility. On the positive side, consistent revenue growth provides a stable financial foundation that could support investment in migration initiatives. However, the overall picture suggests substantial technical, regulatory, and vendor-related challenges that would need to be thoroughly addressed for a successful migration.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

Offentlighedsloven — Assessment Required

As a Danish government ministry, Ministeriet for Natur og Dyrevelfærd is fully subject to the Danish Freedom of Information Act (Offentlighedsloven). This law governs public access to government documents and must be balanced against GDPR data protection obligations. Risk is Medium because: (1) the ministry must manage requests for document access (aktindsigt) while protecting personal data; (2) the ministry's website explicitly provides a mechanism for requesting aktindsigt (document access); (3) failure to properly handle aktindsigt requests can result in complaints to the Parliamentary Ombudsman (Folketingets Ombudsmand); (4) the tension between transparency obligations and GDPR creates ongoing compliance complexity.

Evidence: https://mgtp.dk/kontakt/anmod-om-aktindsigt, https://mgtp.dk/kontakt

Whistleblower Protection — Compliant

The ministry has demonstrably implemented a whistleblower scheme (Whistleblowerordning) as evidenced by its dedicated webpage. This indicates compliance with the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive (2019/1937) and the Danish implementing legislation. Risk is Low because the ministry has visibly implemented the required mechanism, reducing the likelihood of non-compliance.

Evidence: https://mgtp.dk/ministeriet/whistleblowerordning, https://mgtp.dk/ministeriet

EU Nature Restoration Law — Assessment Required

The EU Nature Restoration Law entered into force in August 2024 and requires EU member states to restore degraded ecosystems. As the Danish ministry responsible for nature, biodiversity, and the Green Tripartite Agreement, Ministeriet for Natur og Dyrevelfærd is the primary national authority responsible for implementing this regulation in Denmark. Risk is Medium because: (1) the ministry is the lead implementing authority; (2) Denmark must submit national restoration plans; (3) failure to implement could result in EU infringement proceedings against Denmark; (4) the ministry's work areas (arealomlægning, natur og biodiversitet, vandmiljø) directly align with restoration obligations.

Evidence: https://mgtp.dk/arbejdsomraader/natur-og-biodiversitet, https://mgtp.dk/arbejdsomraader/vandmiljoe, https://mgtp.dk/arbejdsomraader/arealomlaegning, https://mgtp.dk/groent-danmark

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 9/10

Ministeriet for Natur og Dyrevelfærd (formerly Ministeriet for Grøn Trepart) is a Danish central-government ministry, fully financed by the state budget via Finansloven. As a sovereign-funded entity, it enjoys extremely high financial resilience: its funding comes directly from the Danish State with a 100% appropriation share (bevillingsandel) in 2025 and 99.6% budgeted in 2026, meaning there is essentially no dependency on commercial revenue, fees, or external funding sources. The ministry closed its first standalone year (2025) with only a minor DKK 1.6M overspend (~1% of appropriation), driven by one-off set-up costs including office fit-out, ministerial suite, meeting facilities, website, and branding. It retains a DKK 26.9M carry-over surplus and a DKK 14.9M salary-sum reserve, providing substantial flexibility to absorb overspends. Loan frame utilisation stood at only 62% in 2025, leaving significant headroom against the DKK 22.5M frame, though this is expected to rise to 83% in 2026 as further fit-out costs are capitalised. The negative equity of DKK -29.1M is a presentational feature of Danish state accounts rather than a sign of distress; economically, the position reflects regulated equity plus carried-forward surpluses transferred from the two predecessor ministries. The primary risks relate not to solvency but to political re-organisation risk (evidenced by the recent rebrand) and execution risk on the Green Denmark implementation mandate.

Key strengths: 100% sovereign funding from Danish state budget (Finansloven), DKK 26.9M carried-over surplus provides buffer, DKK 14.9M salary-sum savings reserve, Loan frame utilisation only 62% in 2025 with headroom for capex, Bevillingsandel of 100% in 2025 confirms full appropriation financing, Broad multi-party political mandate via Green Tripartite Agreement, No volatile commercial, fee-financed or subsidy-financed activity

Risk factors: New entity risk — founded August 2024, 2025 was first standalone budgeted year, 1% overspend in 2025 due to transitional set-up costs, Political re-organisation risk evidenced by recent rebrand from Grøn Trepart to Natur og Dyrevelfærd, Loan frame utilisation set to rise to 83% in 2026, reducing capex headroom, Dependency on data quality from two predecessor ministries during resortoverførsel, DKK 9.5M of inherited provisions had to be reversed and re-estimated in 2025

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report