MHM Consult ApS

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · mhmconsult.dk · 13 vendors

MHM Consult ApS is a Danish IT and management consultancy operated by Mark Hissink Muller and associated consultants, with over 20 years of experience. The firm specialises in consulting, enterprise architecture, quality assurance, and M&A due diligence support, helping organisations succeed in a digital world. It is registered in the Danish Business Register under CVR 43301225.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

MHM Consult ApS has an estimated 99% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

3 of MHM Consult ApS's 7 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

7 direct vendors, 152 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

MHM Consult ApS demonstrates medium migration readiness. A major strength is the reported "Total Vendors: 0", which implies no external vendor lock-in. This significantly simplifies any migration effort by removing complex contract negotiations and system disentanglement. Furthermore, their core business in "Solution Architecture Consulting" and "Enterprise Architecture (EA) Consulting" suggests strong internal expertise in architectural planning and execution, which could be leveraged for their own migration. However, there are significant weaknesses and unknowns. The primary weakness is the lack of detailed information about their internal operational tech stack beyond their website (Hugo). Without knowing if their core systems are cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based, it's difficult to assess the complexity and effort required for migration. The regulatory environment, with GDPR applicability and a required NIS2 assessment (with unknown direct applicability), adds compliance considerations that must be carefully managed. Crucially, data residency requirements are "Not publicly available," which is a critical missing piece for planning a compliant cloud migration. Lastly, the absence of financial data makes it impossible to assess their capacity to fund a potentially significant migration effort. The balance of a major strength (no vendor lock-in) against these significant unknowns places them in the middle of the readiness scale.

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

The company is established in Denmark, an EU member state, making GDPR applicable to its processing of any personal data, including that of employees and clients.

As a Danish company, MHM Consult ApS is subject to GDPR. Non-compliance can lead to significant fines. The risk is medium as it likely processes personal data of clients and employees, but the volume is expected to be low given the company's small size.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

Applicability depends on whether the company meets the size thresholds (50+ staff or EUR 10M+ turnover) and operates in a specified sector. Based on available information, it appears to be a micro-enterprise and thus likely out of direct scope.

Direct applicability is unlikely due to the company's small size, which likely falls below the threshold for 'Essential' or 'Important' entities. However, as a consultant to potentially in-scope entities, there could be indirect obligations.

Evidence: https://mhmconsult.dk/

DORA (source) — Assessment Required

DORA applies to financial entities and their critical ICT third-party service providers. MHM Consult ApS's direct applicability is improbable given its size and likely non-critical role in the financial sector's supply chain.

The company is unlikely to be designated as a 'critical ICT third-party provider' by European Supervisory Authorities due to its small scale. The primary risk would be indirect, through contractual obligations from financial sector clients.

Evidence: https://mhmconsult.dk/, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/dora/dora-what-is-dora, https://www.dlapiper.com/en-us/insights/publications/2024/07/dora-when-regulated-entities-additionally-qualify-as-ict-third-party-service-providers, https://www.northdata.com/MNH%20Consulting%20ApS,%20Frederiksberg/CVR%2010106966, https://www.google.com/sorry/index?continue=https://www.google.com/search%3Fq%3Dtime%2Bin%2BDenmark&q=EhAqBdAUBhsnCC6liljUclFvGMuCldUGIjCgCZ-teQ-tQaL-A6SsqHthkzaK9u4BNkI9lDBLBbEtu_D_Y2nDiVqadeTwR-jYhggyAnJSWgFD, https://mhmconsult.dk/services/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

MHM Consult ApS is a very small, founder-driven Danish IT and management consultancy operating under CVR 43301225, incorporated around 2022. The business benefits from a lean cost structure, low overhead, and a flexible associate-network model, which minimizes fixed costs and cash burn risk. Senior positioning in high-value niches such as Enterprise Architecture, DORA/NIS2 compliance, and M&A technology due diligence supports strong day rates and sustainable margins. However, the company's resilience is materially constrained by classic boutique-consultancy risks: extreme key-person dependency on founder Mark Hissink Muller, likely client concentration among 1-3 anchor clients, and scale limitations tied to billable hours. As a Class B/micro ApS, financial transparency is minimal, limiting external creditor assessment. The consultancy is also exposed to cyclical IT and M&A advisory spend. Overall, qualitative resilience is moderate—stable in the near term but structurally fragile.

Key strengths: Lean cost base with founder-plus-associates model, Long-term client engagements providing predictable billings, High-value niche positioning (Enterprise Architecture, M&A due diligence, DORA/NIS2), 20+ years of senior founder credibility, Regulatory tailwinds driving demand

Risk factors: Key-person dependency on founder Mark Hissink Muller, Likely client concentration in 1-3 anchor clients, Scale limited by billable hours, Limited financial transparency as Class B micro ApS, Cyclical exposure to IT and M&A advisory spend, Margin dilution and quality-control risk when scaling via associates

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report