Netplan

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · netplan.dk · 36 vendors

NetPlan system design.dk ApS provides IT support and services for Danish companies, including network solutions, internet, security products, web hosting, and website development. They offer sales, service, and consulting across various IT areas.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 36 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 5

36 direct vendors, 318 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Netplan's migration readiness is assessed as medium readiness (35/100), largely due to critical unknowns and significant regulatory hurdles. The most substantial challenge is the complete lack of information regarding Netplan's internal tech stack. Without knowing if it's legacy, cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based, it's impossible to accurately gauge the technical effort and complexity of a migration. The regulatory environment poses significant constraints, with GDPR ("High risk", "Assessment Required") and EU data residency requirements mandating careful planning for data processing locations and transfers. The "Assessment Required" status for NIS2, SOC2, and ISO 27001 also indicates potential compliance gaps that would need to be addressed as part of any migration strategy, adding complexity and cost. Furthermore, financial stability (ability to fund migration) is unknown, and the vendor lock-in risk is also unknown, which could significantly impact the flexibility and cost of transitioning services. While the geographic diversity of vendor HQs (10 unique countries) could suggest a less consolidated vendor landscape, potentially easing some aspects of vendor transitions, this benefit is speculative given the unknown lock-in risk and the overwhelming lack of other crucial data points.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is voluntary but widely recognized for information security management. For technology companies, especially those handling sensitive data, ISO 27001 certification demonstrates security maturity and is often required by enterprise customers. Medium risk as lack of certification can impact competitive positioning and customer trust, though not legally mandated.

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applicability depends on Netplan's specific industry sector and size. Without knowing their exact business activities, cannot determine if they fall under Essential or Important Entities. If they are in covered sectors (digital infrastructure, ICT services, etc.) and meet size thresholds (50+ employees or €10M+ turnover), NIS2 would apply with significant cybersecurity requirements. Medium risk as non-compliance can result in fines up to €10M or 2% of annual turnover.

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 applies to assurance services providers or companies requiring assurance reporting. Without knowing Netplan's specific business model, cannot determine applicability. Low risk as it's typically relevant only for specific service types (audit firms, assurance providers, or companies needing third-party assurance reports).

Financials

Three-year financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report