Netskope
United States · www.netskope.com · 17 vendors
Netskope, Inc. is a cloud security company that provides a cloud-native platform offering converged security and networking services. It helps organizations secure their web and cloud usage, protect data, and defend against cyber threats. The company provides real-time visibility and control over user activity and data movement across cloud services, websites, and private applications.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 76
- Digital Resilience: 5
- Financial Resilience: 7
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Box, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 14 more
Services catalogue
5 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 17 sub-vendors.
- Netskope
- Data Protection
- Secure Access Service Edge
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 2
17 direct vendors, 226 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 1
- Japan: 1
- Denmark: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- India: 1
- Portugal: 1
- Norway: 2
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Netskope's migration readiness is assessed as low (25/100) due to a critical absence of data on fundamental factors. The most significant gap is the complete lack of information regarding the company's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices vs. legacy, monolithic architectures), which is paramount for determining the complexity and effort required for any migration. Similarly, details on the regulatory environment, specific compliance requirements, and data residency constraints are either missing or not specified, introducing potential unforeseen challenges. The company's financial stability and ability to fund a substantial migration effort cannot be assessed due to the absence of revenue and growth data. While the geographic diversity of vendor owner countries (Australia, Japan, United States, United Kingdom, Denmark) could offer some flexibility in sourcing alternatives, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown' is a major impediment. The conflicting data point of 'Total Vendors: 0' versus 'Total Services: 18' and vendor country information means the actual number of vendors and the extent of potential lock-in are unclear. Without concrete information on the tech stack, financial capacity, regulatory landscape, and clear vendor lock-in risks, a high readiness assessment is not possible, placing Netskope in the low readiness category.
Compliance
7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
FedRAMP — Compliant
FedRAMP is critical for serving US federal government customers. Netskope has achieved FedRAMP High Authorization, which is the highest level of FedRAMP certification. The risk level is Low because they have successfully obtained this authorization and offer Netskope GovCloud for government customers. This positions them well for the public sector market and demonstrates strong security controls meeting government standards.
Evidence: https://www.netskope.com/company/security-compliance-and-assurance, https://www.netskope.com/solutions/public-sector/govcloud, https://www.netskope.com/press-releases/netskope-achieves-fedramp-high-authorization
NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required
NIS2 applicability depends on whether Netskope's customers in the EU fall under Essential or Important Entity categories and whether Netskope qualifies as a critical ICT service provider. As a cybersecurity platform provider serving enterprise customers, some clients may be Essential/Important Entities requiring NIS2 compliance. The risk is Medium because while Netskope may not be directly subject to NIS2, their customers' compliance requirements could impact service delivery and contractual obligations. Non-compliance by customers could affect business relationships and require enhanced security measures.
Evidence: https://www.netskope.com/company/security-compliance-and-assurance
HIPAA (source) — Compliant
HIPAA applies to Netskope when serving healthcare customers who handle Protected Health Information (PHI). As a cloud security provider, Netskope would be a Business Associate under HIPAA when processing PHI. The risk level is Medium because healthcare is a regulated industry with strict data protection requirements, and HIPAA violations can result in significant penalties. However, Netskope has demonstrated compliance through formal assessment and can enter into Business Associate Agreements.
Evidence: https://www.netskope.com/company/security-compliance-and-assurance
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2026: revenue USD 709M, EBIT USD -653M, equity USD 195M
- 2025: revenue USD 538M, EBIT USD -256M, equity USD -486M
- 2024: revenue USD 407M, EBIT USD -313M, equity USD -257M
Financial Resilience Score: 7/10
Netskope demonstrates strong top-line momentum and improving unit economics, having grown revenue at 32% YoY to $709M in FY2026 while expanding non-GAAP gross margins from 69% to 75%. The company reached $811M in ARR — a key forward-looking indicator for subscription businesses — reflecting durable, recurring revenue with high predictability. Most critically, FY2026 marked the company's first full year of positive free cash flow ($12.4M), a meaningful inflection point that signals the business model can self-fund at scale without continuous external capital injections. The balance sheet is robust, with $1.2 billion in cash and marketable securities providing substantial multi-year runway. This liquidity position, bolstered by the September 2025 IPO proceeds, gives Netskope strategic flexibility for R&D investment, potential M&A, and weathering macroeconomic headwinds. The subscription-dominant revenue model (ARR constituting virtually all revenue) provides high visibility and reduces revenue volatility typical of transactional businesses. However, significant concerns temper the overall resilience score. GAAP operating losses widened dramatically to -$652.6M in FY2026 (-92% margin), largely driven by IPO-related stock-based compensation. While non-GAAP operating losses improved to -$111.1M (-16% margin), the path to GAAP profitability remains distant and multi-year. The company also faces intense competition from larger, better-capitalized rivals including Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, and Cisco, which could pressure growth rates and margins over time. Additional risks include the lock-up expiration in March 2026 releasing ~390 million shares, creating near-term stock price pressure, and the inherent execution risks of transitioning from a private to a public company with quarterly reporting obligations. FY2027 guidance of $870M–$876M revenue (~23% growth) and -10% non-GAAP operating margin suggests continued improvement but a still-loss-making trajectory in the near term.
Key strengths: FY2026 first full year of positive free cash flow ($12.4M FCF, +$163.5M improvement YoY), $1.2 billion cash and marketable securities providing strong multi-year liquidity runway, Non-GAAP gross margin expanded from 69% to 75% in a single year, approaching best-in-class SaaS levels, $811M ARR growing at 31% YoY providing high revenue visibility and predictability, Subscription-dominant recurring revenue model with virtually all revenue from cloud ARR, Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader in both SSE and SASE Platforms (2025) — rare dual recognition, 30+ Fortune 100 customers providing revenue stability and enterprise reference credibility, FedRAMP High Authorization enabling penetration of sticky US federal government market, Non-GAAP operating loss improved by $70.3M YoY, demonstrating genuine operational leverage, Strong AI security tailwinds as enterprises seek to secure AI traffic and data
Risk factors: GAAP operating margin of -92% in FY2026, with GAAP profitability remaining distant, Intense competition from larger rivals: Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, Fortinet, IPO lock-up expiration March 13, 2026 releasing ~390M shares creating stock price overhang, Non-GAAP operating margin still negative at -16% with multi-year path to profitability, Execution risk transitioning from private to public company with quarterly reporting obligations, Potential customer concentration risk not explicitly disclosed in public filings, Macroeconomic sensitivity — enterprise sales cycles can elongate during downturns, Limited public financial disclosure history as a newly public company (IPO September 2025), FY2024 and earlier audited financials not separately accessible outside IPO S-1 prospectus, Valuation risk subject to market sentiment shifts around growth-stage tech companies
Revenue by geography
- North America: 55%
- EMEA: 30%
- APAC: 15%
Revenue by product/service
- Subscription / Cloud Platform ARR: 90%
- Professional Services, Training, Hardware & Other Non-Recurring: 10%
Workforce by country
- India: 0
- Italy: 0
- Japan: 0
- France: 0
- Germany: 0
- Australia: 0
- Singapore: 0
- United States: 0
- United Kingdom: 0
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.