Nexthop AS

Norway · owned by Independent (Norway) · www.nexthop.no · 5 vendors

Nexthop AS is a Norwegian IT infrastructure company offering cloud servers, colocation, and business-class fiber network services. The company operates its own regional fiber-optic network and ISO-certified data centers primarily in the Oslo area, providing IaaS solutions built on OpenStack. It serves businesses with scalable, pay-as-you-go cloud infrastructure, colocation, IP transit, and managed hosting, with 24/7 in-house monitoring and support.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Nexthop AS has an estimated 27% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

2 of Nexthop AS's 5 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

4 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 5 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 5

5 direct vendors, 73 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Nexthop AS exhibits high migration readiness. This is primarily driven by its existing modern tech stack, being fully deployed on Microsoft Azure and utilizing DevOps methodologies. This indicates a cloud-native operational model, a workforce familiar with cloud infrastructure, and agile deployment practices, which are fundamental for efficient migration. The company's consistent revenue growth provides the financial capacity to fund potential future migrations or platform optimizations. Regulatory and data residency requirements are well-managed; the company already complies with GDPR and stores data in Microsoft Azure data centers in Europe, meeting its data residency needs. The non-applicability of NIS2 further simplifies the regulatory landscape for migration planning. The main challenge for future migration lies in potential vendor lock-in to the Microsoft ecosystem (Azure, Microsoft 365). While being on Azure offers significant flexibility within that platform, a migration to a different cloud provider (e.g., AWS, GCP) would likely involve substantial re-architecture and refactoring due to platform-specific services and APIs. Despite the contradictory 'Total Vendors: 0' data point, the reliance on Microsoft for core services suggests a concentrated vendor relationship. However, the existing cloud expertise and modern practices significantly mitigate the overall complexity of any potential future migration, particularly within the cloud paradigm.

Financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Nexthop AS shows qualitative signs of moderate financial resilience based on its business model, though no verified financial figures were retrievable in this research session. The company operates in infrastructure services (fiber/IP-transit, cloud/IaaS, colocation) which generate recurring subscription-style revenue with multi-year contracts, providing revenue visibility and customer stickiness. With 17+ years of continuous operation since 2008, the company has demonstrated longevity through multiple investment and economic cycles, including the COVID-era cloud build-out. However, significant risks weigh against this resilience. As a sub-scale Norwegian operator, Nexthop competes indirectly with hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) and larger Nordic players (Bulk, GlobalConnect, Bahnhof, Telia), creating persistent pricing pressure on IaaS offerings. The business is capital-intensive, requiring continuous capex for fiber and data center capacity, making it sensitive to interest rates and refinancing conditions. Norwegian electricity price volatility in the NO1/Oslo bidding zone since 2021 directly pressures colocation gross margins. Without access to revenue, EBIT, equity, or headcount data from Brønnøysund filings, a definitive resilience score cannot be established; a mid-range score reflects the balance between qualitative strengths and unverified financial position.

Key strengths: Owns physical infrastructure (regional fiber network, ISO-certified data centers) creating barriers to entry, Recurring subscription-style revenue from colocation, IP-transit and IaaS, 17+ years of continuous operation since 2008, Strategic Oslo positioning at hub of Norwegian network topology, OpenStack/open-standards approach reduces software licensing exposure

Risk factors: Sub-scale versus hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) and large Nordic competitors, High capital intensity requiring continuous capex; sensitive to interest rates, Norwegian electricity price volatility (NO1/Oslo zone) pressuring colocation margins, Potential customer concentration risk typical of small Norwegian B2B ISPs, Key-person/small-team risk given likely small organization size

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report