NNI A/S
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · www.nni.dk · 2 vendors
NNI A/S is a Danish company that provides services related to property and administration.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 2
Disruption prediction
NNI A/S has an estimated 27% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
2 of NNI A/S's 2 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- Cloudflare, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 2 sub-vendors.
- Hosting
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-15 · revision 9
2 direct vendors, 80 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 2
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- China: 1
- Netherlands: 2
- Canada: 1
Migration Readiness: 2/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
NNI A/S demonstrates low migration readiness due to a combination of severe vendor lock-in, complex regulatory and data residency requirements, and a significant lack of information regarding its internal technology stack and financial stability. The company's reliance on US-based vendors for all 5 identified services presents a major challenge for migration, implying high vendor lock-in and potential difficulty in disentangling critical services. This is further complicated by the 'High risk' GDPR status and strict EU data residency requirements, which mandate that personal data of EU residents be processed within the EU/EEA or in countries with adequacy decisions, requiring appropriate safeguards for transfers to US vendors. The absence of data on the internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices) makes it impossible to assess current modernization efforts and suggests a potential reliance on legacy systems, which would increase the complexity and cost of migration. Additionally, the unknown financial stability (revenue, growth) poses a risk to funding any significant migration initiative. Other 'Assessment Required' regulations (NIS2, SOC2, ISO 27001) could also impose specific security and operational requirements on a new cloud environment, adding to migration complexity.
Compliance
8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required
ISAE 3000 is an assurance standard issued by the IAASB, used when organizations need independent third-party assurance on non-financial information (e.g., sustainability reports, GDPR compliance, cybersecurity controls). It is not a legal requirement but is relevant if NNI A/S provides assurance services or is required by stakeholders to obtain third-party assurance on its own controls. Risk is Low as it is voluntary and context-dependent.
EU AI Act (source) — Assessment Required
The EU AI Act entered into force in August 2024 and applies to providers and deployers of AI systems in the EU. Applicability depends on whether NNI A/S develops, deploys, or uses AI systems in its operations. Risk is currently Low as the Act is being phased in (prohibited AI practices: February 2025; high-risk AI: August 2026), but organizations should begin gap assessments now.
Evidence: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024R1689, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
Danish Annual Accounts Act — Assessment Required
All Danish A/S companies are required to file annual accounts with the Danish Business Authority (Erhvervsstyrelsen). Non-compliance results in fines and potential forced dissolution. Risk is Medium because this is a standard corporate compliance obligation; however, failure to file or material misstatements carry legal consequences.
Evidence: https://www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk, https://datacvr.virk.dk
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.