Object First (US) Inc.

United States · owned by Independent (United States) · objectfirst.com · 29 vendors

Object First is a cybersecurity and data storage company that develops Ootbi (Out-of-the-Box Immutability), a purpose-built ransomware-proof and immutable backup storage appliance designed specifically for Veeam environments. The company's mission is to help organizations become cyber resilient through secure, simple, and powerful backup storage that is absolutely immutable out of the box. Object First targets businesses seeking protection against ransomware and malicious data encryption.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-04-13 · revision 3

29 direct vendors, 290 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Object First exhibits high migration readiness due to its modern and cloud-native oriented technology stack. The extensive use of S3-native object storage, coupled with internal reliance on AWS, DigitalOcean Spaces, and Cloudflare, indicates an architecture that is inherently flexible and portable across different cloud environments. Their products are designed around open standards (S3) and modern principles (Zero Trust, immutability), which significantly reduces technical barriers to migration. The company's rapid growth suggests financial stability to fund potential migration initiatives. Furthermore, their existing robust regulatory compliance (GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, NIS2) means they have established processes and expertise to manage complex compliance requirements during a migration, rather than having to build them from scratch. A primary challenge for migration readiness is the explicit data residency requirement for data centers in Poland. Any migration strategy would need to carefully consider and adhere to this geographical constraint, potentially limiting target regions or adding complexity to data transfer and storage planning. Similar to resilience, the vendor data is ambiguous regarding the total number of vendors; if the actual number of distinct vendors is low, it could imply a higher risk of vendor lock-in, which would complicate disentanglement during a migration. Missing financial concentration data also prevents a full assessment of potential financial flexibility during a large-scale migration.

Compliance

6 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

CCPA — Compliant

Object First explicitly states CCPA compliance in their privacy policy and Trust Center. As a US company with California customers, CCPA compliance is mandatory. They have implemented required consumer rights, do not sell personal information, and have proper disclosure practices. The risk is low due to their documented compliance measures and clear privacy practices.

Evidence: https://objectfirst.com/legal/privacy-policy/, https://objectfirst.com/legal/california-do-not-share-sell/

GDPR (source) — Compliant

Object First demonstrates GDPR compliance through their comprehensive privacy policy, DSAR form availability, and explicit GDPR compliance statements. However, as a US-based company with EU operations and data processing, they face ongoing compliance obligations. The risk is medium due to the complexity of cross-border data transfers and the need for continuous compliance monitoring. Their privacy policy shows proper legal bases, data subject rights implementation, and Standard Contractual Clauses for international transfers.

Evidence: https://objectfirst.com/legal/privacy-policy/, https://objectfirst.com/trust-center/, https://my.datasubject.com/16CY2jU8Uv83w1BCJ/36785/

Financial Services Compliance — Partially Compliant

Object First has obtained third-party validation from Cohasset Associates for financial services compliance, demonstrating alignment with key financial compliance frameworks. However, specific certifications for individual regulations (like SOX, PCI DSS) are not explicitly documented. The risk is medium because while they show preparation for FinServ requirements, ongoing compliance monitoring and specific certifications may be needed for different financial regulations.

Evidence: https://objectfirst.com/independent-cohasset-report-summary/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Object First benefits from exceptional founder credibility — its co-founders Ratmir Timashev and Andrei Baronov previously built Veeam Software to over $1 billion in annual recurring revenue before a ~$5 billion acquisition by Insight Partners in 2020. This pedigree provides meaningful investor confidence, enterprise customer trust, and channel partner access that a typical early-stage startup would not enjoy. The company has secured a validated $17.5 million Series A in January 2023 and operates through Tier-1 global distributors including Arrow Electronics, Ingram Micro, TD Synnex, and CDW, which reduces direct sales costs and accelerates market penetration. The company operates in a high-demand, fast-growing niche — immutable backup storage for ransomware defense — which is structurally supported by the ongoing ransomware threat landscape. Third-party security validation from NCC Group, CISA Secure by Design alignment, and Cohasset Associates FinServ compliance certification reduce procurement friction with enterprise and regulated-sector customers. Consistent CRN award recognition across 2023, 2024, and 2025 further signals healthy channel momentum and market traction. However, significant risks temper the resilience score. The company's entire product strategy and revenue base is explicitly dependent on a single ecosystem partner — Veeam Software — representing a critical concentration risk. Any adverse change in Veeam's market position or partner strategy could be existential. The confirmed capital base of only $17.5 million is modest relative to well-capitalized competitors such as Pure Storage, Dell EMC, Cohesity, and Rubrik. The hardware appliance model introduces supply chain risk, margin pressure, and longer sales cycles compared to software or SaaS peers. With no public financial disclosure available — no revenue, EBIT, or equity figures for any fiscal year — it is impossible to independently verify financial health, cash burn rate, or profitability trajectory. The company is almost certainly operating at a net loss given its growth-stage status. The single-product dependency (Ootbi appliance family) and limited geographic diversification evidence further constrain the resilience assessment. Direct NDA-protected financial disclosure from the company would be required for any meaningful credit or investment due diligence.

Key strengths: Founder pedigree: co-founders previously built Veeam Software to $1B+ ARR and ~$5B acquisition, $17.5 million Series A funding validated by institutional investors (January 2023), Tier-1 global distributor relationships: Arrow Electronics, Ingram Micro, TD Synnex, CDW, Operates in high-demand immutable backup storage niche driven by ransomware threat landscape, Third-party security validation: NCC Group pen test, CISA Secure by Design, Cohasset FinServ certification, Consistent CRN award recognition in 2023, 2024, and 2025 indicating channel momentum, Flexible consumption/pay-per-use model introduced alongside CapEx purchasing to broaden addressable market, Channel-first sales model reduces direct sales cost and accelerates market reach

Risk factors: Critical single-vendor dependency on Veeam Software — entire product strategy built around one ecosystem partner, Single-product revenue concentration — 100% dependent on Ootbi appliance family with no SaaS or multi-product diversification, Limited confirmed capital base (~$17.5M Series A) relative to well-capitalized competitors (Pure Storage, Dell EMC, Cohesity, Rubrik), Hardware appliance business model carries supply chain risk, hardware margin pressure, and longer sales cycles, No confirmed profitability — almost certainly operating at a net loss as a growth-stage venture-backed company, No public financial transparency — revenue, EBIT, and equity entirely undisclosed for all fiscal years, No confirmed Series B or subsequent funding round as of mid-2025, raising questions about runway, Competitive pressure from established players (Cohesity, Rubrik, Commvault, ExaGrid) and hyperscaler cloud immutability offerings, Geopolitical/reputational sensitivity in government or regulated-sector sales due to founders' Russian origins

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report