OPC Foundation Due Diligence

Run due diligence on OPC Foundation: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

United States · opcfoundation.org · 14 vendors

The OPC Foundation is an industry consortium that develops and maintains standards for secure and reliable data exchange in industrial automation and other industries. It aims to ensure interoperability among devices from multiple vendors across various platforms.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 14 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-23 · revision 6

14 direct vendors, 122 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://opcfoundation.org/privacy-policy/, https://opcfoundation.org/about/contact-us/

SOC 2 (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://opcfoundation.org/, https://opcfoundation.org/privacy-policy/

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://opcfoundation.org/security/, https://opcfoundation.org/privacy-policy/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

The OPC Foundation demonstrates strong structural financial resilience despite the complete absence of publicly disclosed financial figures. Its position as the steward of OPC UA — the dominant industrial interoperability standard embedded in 52 million+ applications across 5,200+ suppliers — creates deep, durable demand for its membership, certification, and test tool services. The tiered membership dues model, spanning from $500 (Startup) to $40,000 (Corporate Class AAA), provides a predictable and recurring revenue base anchored by large, financially stable industrial corporations such as Siemens, Rockwell Automation, ABB, Honeywell, and Emerson at the highest dues tiers. The Foundation's low capital intensity further supports resilience: as a standards body, it relies heavily on volunteer engineers from member companies for technical work, minimizing fixed operating costs. Its growing relevance across new domains — Digital Product Passports, OPC UA Safety (TÜV SÜD certified 2025), cloud integration, and the CEN/CENELEC liaison agreement — expands its addressable membership base and reduces the risk of stagnation. International presence across the US, Germany, Japan, and China diversifies its membership geography. Key risks include concentration in membership dues as the primary revenue stream, vulnerability to large-member attrition through M&A or shifting priorities, and operational dependence on a small professional staff. Competition from alternative protocols (MQTT, DDS, proprietary ecosystems) and geopolitical risks affecting China and Japan operations represent additional headwinds. The complete lack of published financials prevents any quantitative stress-testing of these risks, which tempers the overall resilience score.

Key strengths: Entrenched position as steward of OPC UA, embedded in 52 million+ applications across 5,200+ suppliers, Recurring, tiered membership dues model with large industrial anchor members (Siemens, ABB, Rockwell, Honeywell, Emerson), Low capital intensity — technical work performed largely by volunteer member engineers, Growing relevance in new domains: Digital Product Passports, OPC UA Safety, cloud integration, CEN/CENELEC liaison, IEC 62541 international standard status provides regulatory legitimacy and broad membership incentive, International presence across US, Germany, Japan, and China diversifies membership base, Mission-critical, near-irreplaceable role in IIoT/Industry 4.0 ecosystem

Risk factors: Heavy concentration in membership dues as primary revenue stream — vulnerable to large-member attrition or consolidation via M&A, Volunteer-dependent technical model — member company priority shifts can slow standards development and reduce perceived value, Competition from alternative protocols and frameworks (MQTT, DDS, proprietary vendor ecosystems), Geopolitical risk affecting China operations (opcfoundation.cn) and Japan hub, Small professional staff creates key-person and operational capacity risk, Complete absence of published financials limits external oversight and quantitative risk assessment

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report