OpenCorp Due Diligence

Run due diligence on OpenCorp: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · opencorp.eu · 6 vendors

OpenCorp is a Danish business intelligence platform that aggregates publicly available Danish company data from official sources such as the CVR register and the Danish Business Authority's financial filings. It updates data nightly and presents financial statements, key figures, management changes, and competitor insights in plain language. The platform is free to use and targets businesses seeking to understand and monitor the Danish corporate landscape.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

The category benchmark for OpenCorp is a 5% probability of disruption in the next three months.

3 of OpenCorp's 6 vendors have incident tracking.

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-17 · revision 3

6 direct vendors, 145 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

OpenCorp demonstrates medium migration readiness. A key challenge is the explicitly stated 'Medium' vendor lock-in risk, which can complicate and increase the cost of migrating away from current services. The company's internal tech stack details (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices adoption) are not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the ease of migration. While the development of API access and AI-powered search indicates a move towards more modular and modern architectures, these features are not yet publicly available or fully integrated. Financial stability, crucial for funding a migration, is unknown due to a lack of available financial reports. Similarly, regulatory compliance (NIS2) and data residency requirements are undetermined, which could introduce significant complexities and costs during a migration. The limited geographic diversity of vendors (United States, Germany) also adds a layer of complexity to potential vendor transitions.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

EU AML Directives — No public evidence

These directives typically apply to financial institutions and other designated entities. A technology company would likely only be in scope if it provides services that fall under the definition of a financial service or other obliged entity.

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

This is a voluntary information security standard. Technology companies often seek certification to demonstrate robust security practices to customers and partners.

NIS2 (source) — No public evidence

As a technology company in the EU, applicability depends on its size and specific services (e.g., ICT service management, digital provider). Without information on employee count or turnover, its status as 'essential' or 'important' cannot be determined.

Financials

Financial Resilience Score: 3/10

OpenCorp (opencorp.eu) is a pre-monetisation Danish business-data SaaS with no published financial statements, no disclosed operating legal entity, and no CVR number visible on its website. The platform currently offers only a free tier, with paid subscriptions described as 'under preparation,' meaning the entity is effectively pre-revenue or near-zero revenue as of October 2026. Without any accounts to analyse, financial resilience cannot be quantified in the conventional sense. Qualitatively, the business has some structural strengths: its primary data input (CVR / Erhvervsstyrelsen open data) is free, the ingestion pipeline reportedly covers 2,275,348 Danish companies with nightly refresh, and the product positioning is clearly differentiated across four pillars (financial history, peer benchmarking, change detection, market monitoring). However, these strengths do not offset the absence of revenue, the opacity of the operating entity, dependence on continued free government data access, and a crowded competitive landscape including Proff.dk, Virk.dk, cvr.dev, estatistik.dk, Virmo, Navne & Numre Erhverv, and OpenCorporates. The combination of pre-revenue status, undisclosed legal entity, and formal pages still marked 'under udarbejdelse' indicates a very early-stage venture with correspondingly low financial resilience.

Key strengths: Primary data input (CVR / Erhvervsstyrelsen) is free of licensing cost, Operational ingestion pipeline at national scale: 2,275,348 Danish companies covered with nightly refresh, Clear product positioning across four pillars (five-year financial history, peer benchmarking, change detection, market monitoring)

Risk factors: No revenue yet — platform is free, paid subscriptions not launched, No published legal entity, CVR number, or governance disclosure, Crowded competitive landscape (Proff.dk, Virk.dk, cvr.dev, estatistik.dk, Virmo, Navne & Numre Erhverv, OpenCorporates), 100% regulatory dependency on continued free access to CVR/Erhvervsstyrelsen data, Formal pages (Contact, Terms of Service, Terms of Trade) still 'under preparation', High opacity prevents counterparty assessment of OpenCorp's own financial strength

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report