OpenMetal, Inc.

United States · openmetal.io · 21 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 21 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-02 · revision 1

21 direct vendors, 264 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

OpenMetal exhibits very high migration readiness, driven by its cutting-edge, cloud-native technology stack. The extensive use of OpenStack, Kubernetes, OpenShift, and Ceph, along with bare metal provisioning and GPU compute capabilities, positions the company at the forefront of modern infrastructure. Their product offerings, such as "Hosted Private Cloud" and "Managed Private Cloud," explicitly cater to large-scale deployments and cloud migrations, demonstrating inherent expertise and a business model aligned with migration readiness. The strong emphasis on open-source infrastructure significantly reduces vendor lock-in, providing flexibility and ease of transition. While specific data on financial stability to fund migrations, regulatory environment, and data residency requirements is not available, the technical foundation and strategic focus on cloud infrastructure strongly indicate a highly adaptable and migration-ready organization. The contradictory "Total Vendors: 0" data point is noted, but the open-source nature of their core technologies inherently minimizes vendor lock-in risks for their internal operations.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is highly relevant for OpenMetal as a cloud IaaS provider. Customers — particularly enterprises, MSPs, SaaS providers, and compliance-driven organizations — routinely require SOC 2 Type II reports from their cloud infrastructure providers as part of vendor due diligence. The risk is High because: (1) absence of SOC 2 certification is a significant commercial and trust risk for a cloud provider; (2) enterprise and regulated-industry customers (finance, healthcare, government) typically mandate SOC 2 from IaaS vendors; (3) without SOC 2, OpenMetal may be excluded from procurement processes; (4) the AICPA Trust Services Criteria (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy) are directly applicable to OpenMetal's service model.

Evidence: https://openmetal.io, https://openmetal.io/legal/

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

OpenMetal operates data centers in Europe (EU region explicitly listed on their website alongside US East, US West, and APAC), meaning they process and store data of EU/EEA residents and operate infrastructure within the EU. As an IaaS provider offering hosted private cloud, bare metal, and storage services in the EU, they are both a data processor (for customer workloads) and a data controller (for customer/employee personal data). Non-compliance with GDPR can result in fines up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover. The combination of EU data center operations, cloud service delivery to EU customers, and the sensitivity of infrastructure-level data processing elevates this to High risk.

Evidence: https://openmetal.io, https://openmetal.io/legal/

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 explicitly lists 'cloud computing service providers' and 'data centre service providers' as Important Entities under Annex II. OpenMetal operates EU data centers and provides IaaS cloud services (hosted private cloud, bare metal, storage) to EU customers. If OpenMetal meets the medium enterprise threshold (50+ employees or €10M+ annual turnover) and has EU operations, NIS2 applies. The risk is Medium rather than High because: (1) OpenMetal is a US-headquartered company and NIS2 applicability to non-EU entities depends on whether they offer services within the EU; (2) size thresholds are unconfirmed from public sources; (3) enforcement is still maturing across EU member states. However, failure to comply where applicable could result in fines up to €7 million or 1.4% of global annual turnover for Important Entities.

Evidence: https://openmetal.io, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2555

Financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

OpenMetal, Inc. is a privately held U.S. cloud infrastructure company that does not publicly disclose any financial statements. No revenue, EBIT, equity, or cash flow data is available through SEC EDGAR or other public sources, making quantitative financial assessment impossible. The company appears to be bootstrapped or privately funded without publicly reported venture capital rounds, which suggests either strategic backing or organic growth funding. Qualitatively, OpenMetal benefits from favorable market tailwinds including the cloud repatriation trend, growing AI/GPU infrastructure demand, and its differentiated positioning as a fixed-cost, open-source-based alternative to hyperscalers. It has third-party validation from S&P Global Market Intelligence and the Open Infrastructure Foundation, plus a diverse customer base across SaaS, cybersecurity, and cloud-native verticals. Recent expansion into GPU clusters and a new v5 hardware catalog signal continued investment and growth. However, significant risks include capital intensity of bare-metal/private-cloud businesses requiring ongoing hardware CapEx, competition from both well-funded hyperscalers and specialist peers (OVHcloud, Vultr, Latitude.sh), a limited 4-data-center footprint versus global hyperscalers, unknown customer concentration, and heavy dependency on complex OpenStack/Ceph ecosystems. The complete lack of financial transparency prevents assessment of solvency, burn rate, or runway, warranting a middle-of-the-road resilience score.

Key strengths: Differentiated fixed-cost private cloud positioning vs. hyperscalers, Cloud repatriation and AI/GPU infrastructure tailwinds, Open-source ecosystem alignment with OpenStack and Ceph, Third-party validation from S&P Global and Open Infrastructure Foundation, Diverse customer verticals across SaaS, cybersecurity, and cloud-native, Four Tier III data centers across North America, Europe, and APAC, Recent CTO hire (Jamie Tischart) signaling scaling phase, Launch of v5 hardware catalog with Intel Xeon 6000-series and DDR5

Risk factors: Complete opacity of financials prevents solvency/runway assessment, Capital-intensive hardware refresh cycles for bare-metal business, Competition from well-funded hyperscalers (AWS, Azure, GCP), Specialist peer competition (OVHcloud, Vultr, Latitude.sh, VEXXHOST), Limited 4-data-center scale vs. hyperscaler global footprint, Unknown customer concentration risk, Heavy dependency on complex OpenStack/Ceph technology stack, No publicly reported institutional funding rounds

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report