PAYS Due Diligence

Run due diligence on PAYS: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers or ownership change.

Denmark · owned by Sophie Laursen ApS (Denmark) · pays.dk · 15 vendors

PAYS is a Danish company operating under the brand name PAYS. Its website is currently under reconstruction, limiting available public information, but the brand name and domain strongly suggest involvement in payments or financial services in Denmark.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-10-10 · revision 3

15 direct vendors, 172 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

PAYS demonstrates low migration readiness. The primary challenge stems from its internal tech stack, consisting of "WordPress" and "Elementor." These technologies are not cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-oriented, indicating that any significant migration to modern cloud infrastructure would likely require a complete re-platforming or extensive re-architecture rather than a simpler lift-and-shift. This implies high complexity, cost, and time investment for migration. The regulatory environment, including PCI DSS, GDPR, Danish Financial Services Act, and NIS2, imposes strict compliance requirements that add significant complexity to migration planning and execution, demanding meticulous attention to data security, privacy, and operational continuity. Data residency requirements, likely within the EU/EEA, further constrain choices for cloud providers and regions. While the company benefits from a diverse vendor base (15 vendors, 10 countries) with low reported vendor lock-in, which is a positive factor for flexibility, it does not outweigh the fundamental technical debt and architectural challenges posed by the current tech stack. Information regarding financial stability (revenue concentration) and specific key technologies is not available, which could impact the ability to fund or execute a large-scale migration project.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — No public evidence

SOC 2 is an auditing procedure that ensures service providers securely manage data to protect the interests of their clients. It is highly relevant for a financial services company like PAYS that likely processes data for other businesses.

Finansiel Virksomhedslov — No public evidence

As a company operating in the financial services sector in Denmark, PAYS is subject to the provisions of the Danish Financial Business Act, which governs the operations of financial undertakings.

Evidence: https://zavia.ai/companies/pays-aps-dk-89652423/

Hvidvaskloven — No public evidence

The Danish Anti-Money Laundering Act (Hvidvaskloven) applies to all financial institutions in Denmark. PAYS, being in the financial services industry, falls under the scope of this regulation.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 4/10

Pays ApS shows a clear operational turnaround over the past three fiscal years, with EBIT compounding from DKK 117K in FY2023 to DKK 488K in FY2025, and net profit reaching a record DKK 317K. Three consecutive profitable years with improving operating leverage (EBIT more than doubled on flat gross profit) and continuity of management under director Sophie Laursen (7-year tenure) provide operational stability. The company is also audited by BDO, a reputable firm, giving external assurance uncommon for a micro-entity of this scale. However, significant structural weaknesses weigh on resilience. Equity remains negative at DKK -320K (technically insolvent on a book basis, though trending toward break-even), the current ratio is 0.73 indicating strained liquidity (down sharply from 244% in 2024), and total debt of DKK 952K exceeds total assets of DKK 632K, giving gearing above 100%. Solvency is classified as 'not satisfactory' at -50.7%. The business is also exposed to single-key-person dependency with only 2 FTEs, and revenue opacity (turnover not disclosed) prevents external assessment of top-line trends or customer concentration. The website being offline further weakens the public profile. On balance, the positive trajectory is encouraging but the balance sheet remains fragile.

Key strengths: Three consecutive profitable years (FY2023-FY2025), EBIT grew ~4x from DKK 117K to DKK 488K over three years, Equity improving from DKK -805K (FY2022) toward break-even, Audited by BDO Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab, 7-year management continuity under director Sophie Laursen, Improving operating leverage (EBIT doubling on flat gross profit)

Risk factors: Negative equity of DKK -320K (technically insolvent on book basis), Current ratio of 0.73 indicates strained liquidity, Total debt (DKK 952K) exceeds total assets (DKK 632K), Solvency ratio of -50.7% classified as not satisfactory, Single-key-person dependency with only 2 FTEs, Revenue not disclosed, preventing top-line analysis, Company website offline / under reconstruction, Liquidity deteriorated sharply from 244% in 2024 to 72.7% in 2025

Revenue by geography

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report