Peventio Cybersecurity ApS

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · peventio.com · 12 vendors

Peventio Cybersecurity ApS is a Danish cybersecurity company that provides IT security advisory and solutions to Danish businesses, including vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, endpoint detection and response, data audits, and CISO services. The company helps organisations strengthen their compliance posture and defend against cyber threats by combining specialist expertise with leading security products. It also partners with Danish Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to extend its cybersecurity capabilities to their end customers.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Peventio Cybersecurity ApS has an estimated 17% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

3 of Peventio Cybersecurity ApS's 12 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 15

12 direct vendors, 181 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Peventio Cybersecurity ApS demonstrates medium migration readiness. The most significant challenge to migration readiness stems from the complex regulatory environment and data residency requirements. The company is 'Partially Compliant' with GDPR and the Danish Data Protection Act, and 'Assessment Required' for NIS2 and the Danish Cybersecurity Act. These regulations, coupled with EU/EEA data residency requirements for personal data and the need for proper safeguards (e.g., SCCs, DPF) for transfers to US-based vendors (Netwrix, Progress), introduce substantial complexity and cost to any migration effort. The current compliance gaps suggest that these requirements are not fully addressed even in their existing state, making a compliant migration more arduous. Peventio's internal tech stack includes Concrete CMS, which could be a legacy component requiring significant effort to migrate. Financial stability to fund a potentially costly migration is unknown due to a lack of publicly available growth history. However, several factors contribute positively to migration readiness. Peventio already leverages EU-based cloud infrastructure for EDR data processing and relies on multiple SaaS/cloud-based partner tools (e.g., SentinelOne, OnDMARC, Edgescan, Holm Security). This indicates familiarity with cloud services and reduces monolithic dependencies. The company also benefits from moderate vendor diversity, with partners from various geographies, which can mitigate vendor lock-in risks compared to a single-vendor strategy. While switching core platforms like EDR or RMM would still be a significant undertaking, the existing cloud adoption and vendor landscape provide a foundation for future migration, albeit one heavily constrained by regulatory and data residency complexities.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Partially Compliant

GDPR is universally applicable to Peventio as a Danish-registered company (CVR: DK41431431) operating entirely within the EU. As a cybersecurity firm, Peventio processes personal data in multiple high-sensitivity capacities: (1) client employee data during penetration tests, vulnerability scans, and awareness training; (2) potentially sensitive system and network data belonging to client organisations; (3) contact data collected via website forms and newsletter sign-ups; (4) employee/HR data internally. The risk level is HIGH because: (a) the published privacy policy is materially deficient — it lacks a named Data Protection Officer (DPO) or DPO contact point, omits lawful bases for processing under Art. 6, contains no Art. 13/14 transparency notices, does not address data subject rights (Art. 15–22), does not mention data retention periods, and does not address international data transfers or sub-processor relationships; (b) as a cybersecurity provider, Peventio likely processes special categories of data or highly sensitive client infrastructure data, elevating regulatory scrutiny; (c) the Danish Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet) is an active enforcer with a track record of issuing fines and reprimands to Danish companies; (d) non-compliance penalties can reach €20M or 4% of global annual turnover under Art. 83(5). The gap between the company's stated security expertise and its own privacy compliance posture represents a reputational and legal risk.

Evidence: https://peventio.com/privacy-cookie-policy, https://peventio.com/, https://peventio.com/peventio/about, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016R0679

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applicability to Peventio requires careful analysis across two dimensions — sector classification and size threshold. On sector: NIS2 Annex I and II include 'ICT service management (B2B)' as an Important Entity category, and 'digital providers' including managed security service providers (MSSPs). Peventio provides cybersecurity services (vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, EDR, CISO-as-a-Service, network monitoring) to Danish businesses and MSP resellers — this profile closely resembles an MSSP or ICT security service provider, which falls under NIS2 scope. Denmark transposed NIS2 into national law via 'Lov om sikkerhed i net- og informationssystemer' (NIS2-loven), effective October 2024. On size: NIS2 applies to medium enterprises (50+ employees OR €10M+ annual turnover) and large enterprises. Peventio appears to be a small company based on website presentation (small team of specialists/advisors), which would place it below the NIS2 size threshold and potentially exempt it. However, employee count and turnover are not publicly disclosed, making definitive size assessment impossible. Risk is MEDIUM because: if Peventio meets the size threshold, NIS2 compliance obligations (risk management measures, incident reporting within 24/72 hours, supply chain security, management accountability) would be mandatory; the Danish Centre for Cyber Security (CFCS) and the Danish Business Authority enforce NIS2 in Denmark; non-compliance can result in fines up to €10M or 2% of global turnover for Important Entities.

Evidence: https://peventio.com/peventio/about, https://peventio.com/, https://www.cfcs.dk/en/, https://erhvervsstyrelsen.dk/nis2, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022L2555

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC 2 is a voluntary US framework (AICPA) but has become a de facto market requirement for technology and cybersecurity service providers, particularly those serving enterprise clients or US-connected businesses. Peventio provides managed cybersecurity services including EDR, network monitoring, CISO-as-a-Service, and vulnerability management — service categories where enterprise clients increasingly demand SOC 2 Type II reports as evidence of security controls. Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) without SOC 2 certification, Peventio may face competitive disadvantage when bidding for contracts with larger enterprises or internationally-connected Danish companies; (2) as a cybersecurity company, the absence of a SOC 2 report is a credibility gap — clients entrust Peventio with access to their sensitive systems; (3) however, SOC 2 is not legally mandated in Denmark/EU, so non-compliance carries no regulatory penalty, only commercial risk.

Evidence: https://peventio.com/, https://peventio.com/peventio/about, https://www.aicpa-cima.com/resources/landing/soc-2-reporting-on-an-examination-of-controls-at-a-service-organization-relevant-to-security-availability-processing-integrity-confidentiality-or-privacy

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Peventio Cybersecurity ApS operates in a structurally growing market driven by Danish and EU regulation (NIS2, GDPR, DORA), which creates sustained demand for cybersecurity advisory, penetration testing, awareness training, and CISO-as-a-service. The company's asset-light services model, combined with potential recurring revenue from subscription products (EDR, DMARC/DKIM monitoring, vulnerability scanning, awareness training), supports cash-flow predictability and limits balance-sheet risk. However, the company is a young ApS (CVR issued circa 2020) with likely only 3-4 fiscal years of filings. As a small entity in a competitive Danish cybersecurity market (competing against Dubex, Improsec, Truesec, Globeteam), it likely has limited absorptive capacity for downturns and thin equity buffers. Key-person and customer concentration risks are typical for firms of this size, and vendor dependence on partners like Edgescan, Holm Security, Netwrix, and Red Sift creates margin exposure to partner program changes. Without access to verified financial figures from datacvr.virk.dk, a precise resilience score cannot be assigned. A mid-range score reflects the balance between favorable market tailwinds and inherent small-company/early-stage risks.

Key strengths: Structurally growing cybersecurity market driven by NIS2, GDPR, DORA regulation, Asset-light services business model with low capex requirements, Recurring revenue potential from subscription products (EDR, DMARC/DKIM, vulnerability scanning), DKK-denominated domestic operations limit FX risk, Diversified service portfolio across vulnerability management, compliance, and security products

Risk factors: Small scale with limited absorptive capacity and likely thin equity buffers, Competitive Danish cybersecurity market (Dubex, Improsec, Truesec, Globeteam), Key-person and customer concentration risk typical for small consultancies, Vendor/partner dependence creating margin compression exposure, Wage inflation for cybersecurity talent in Denmark, Young company (founded ~2020) with limited trading history

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report