Pexip AS

Norway · www.pexip.com · 20 vendors

Pexip Holding ASA is a video technology company that provides a secure and interoperable video conferencing platform. It offers self-hosted software and cloud-based solutions, enabling seamless communication across various devices and platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Google Meet. Pexip's solutions are designed for enterprises and government organizations requiring high-quality, secure, and customizable video collaboration.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 20 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 1

20 direct vendors, 263 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 7/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Pexip AS exhibits high migration readiness, primarily driven by its existing cloud-enabled technology stack and strong compliance expertise. The company extensively uses Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure, coupled with modern development practices (Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, CI/CD, automated testing), which provides a solid foundation for cloud migration and adoption of cloud-native architectures. Pexip's established compliance with stringent standards such as FedRAMP, GDPR, and ISO/IEC 27001 & 27701 indicates it possesses the necessary processes and expertise to manage complex regulatory requirements during a migration, particularly for its government and healthcare clientele. The FedRAMP Authorized 'Pexip Government Cloud' further underscores this capability. However, several factors temper the score. There is no data available on Pexip's financial stability (revenue, growth history), which makes it impossible to assess the financial capacity to fund a significant migration initiative. Specific data residency requirements are also not provided; if strict requirements exist for their clients, this could add considerable complexity and cost to migration planning. Furthermore, while vendor geographic diversity is noted, the exact number of distinct vendors for the 19 services is unclear. This ambiguity makes it difficult to fully assess vendor lock-in risk, which could impact the ease and cost of migrating services. The support for 'self-hosted or private cloud' and 'air-gapped environments' for some products might also imply that certain components are not inherently cloud-native, potentially complicating a full cloud migration.

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report