Plasmic Due Diligence

Run due diligence on Plasmic: check compliance and get alerts when suppliers change.

United States · www.plasmic.app · 7 vendors

Plasmic is an open-source visual development platform that enables users to build websites and applications with a drag-and-drop interface. It integrates with existing codebases, allowing both developers and non-technical teams to create and publish production-ready frontends and content efficiently. The platform aims to democratize software creation by bridging the gap between design and development.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 7 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-23 · revision 7

7 direct vendors, 135 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Compliance

3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Evidence found

Evidence: https://www.plasmic.app/enterprise

GDPR (source) — No public evidence

Evidence: https://docs.plasmic.app/privacy/

ISO 27001 (source) — No public evidence

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Plasmic is an early-to-mid-stage venture-backed US software company with credible institutional backing from NEA, one of the largest US venture firms, and approximately US$13M in total disclosed funding (US$2.2M seed in 2020 and US$11M Series A in 2021). The company benefits from a lean cost structure as a fully remote organization, an open-source distribution model that lowers customer acquisition costs, and enterprise-ready features (SOC 2 compliance, SSO, on-prem deployment) that enable larger ACV deals. However, the company operates in a highly competitive and well-funded category, facing competition from Webflow (>US$4B valuation), Builder.io, Framer, Retool, and emerging AI code-generation tools like Cursor, v0, Lovable, and Bolt. The 4+ year gap since the last announced funding round creates runway opacity—no public information on cash burn, ARR, or runway is available. While tier-1 VC backing provides credibility and access to follow-on capital, the lack of disclosed financial metrics and the disruptive AI competitive threat warrant a moderate resilience score.

Key strengths: Tier-1 institutional backing from NEA, Open-source distribution model reduces CAC, Enterprise-ready features (SOC 2, SSO, on-prem), Freemium pricing model with paid tiers, Lean cost base from fully remote operations, Differentiated positioning vs. competitors (codebase integration), ~US$13M in total disclosed funding

Risk factors: Highly competitive and well-funded category, AI disruption from code-generation tools (Cursor, v0, Lovable, Bolt), Runway opacity—no public cash burn or ARR data since 2021, 4+ year gap since last announced funding round, Significantly smaller than competitors like Webflow, No recurring large customer ARR disclosures, Limited transparency for partners/lenders as a private company

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report