ProspectEye

Sweden · prospecteye.com · 6 vendors

ProspectEye was a Swedish company founded in 2007 that provided lead management and marketing automation software. Its platform offered tools for marketers to optimize advertising campaigns, including audience segmentation, campaign management, and performance tracking.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 6 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 6

6 direct vendors, 114 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

ProspectEye's migration readiness is assessed as low-to-medium, primarily due to significant regulatory and data residency constraints, coupled with a lack of critical technical and financial information. As a Swedish company, strict EU data residency and sovereignty requirements under GDPR will heavily influence any migration strategy, potentially limiting choices for cloud providers and data storage locations. The numerous 'Assessment Required' statuses for key regulations (GDPR, NIS2, SOC2, ISO 27001) indicate that ensuring compliance in a new environment will be a complex and resource-intensive undertaking. The absence of details regarding ProspectEye's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerized, microservices) makes it difficult to assess the technical ease of migration; without this information, it's prudent to assume potential challenges if the current architecture is legacy or monolithic. Furthermore, the lack of financial data prevents an assessment of the company's ability to fund a significant migration effort. The presence of 6 services from only two vendor countries suggests a concentrated vendor landscape, which could lead to vendor lock-in and complicate efforts to transition away from existing services.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is voluntary but widely recognized for information security management. For companies handling sensitive data or operating in regulated industries, ISO 27001 certification demonstrates security maturity. Medium risk because while not legally required, lack of certification can impact customer confidence and competitive positioning.

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

GDPR applies to all companies in EU/EEA that process personal data. Given ProspectEye is headquartered in Sweden, GDPR is applicable. High risk due to severe penalties (up to 4% of annual turnover or €20M), strict enforcement in EU, and the fact that virtually all companies process some form of personal data (employee, customer, or supplier data). Non-compliance can result in significant fines, legal action, and reputational damage.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is voluntary but increasingly expected for companies providing cloud services or handling customer data. Without knowing ProspectEye's business model, cannot determine if SOC2 would be beneficial or required by customers. Medium risk because while not legally mandated, lack of SOC2 can impact business relationships and customer trust.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: null/10

No financial data was successfully retrieved for ProspectEye. The research report indicates that multiple source attempts were made but all returned without usable financial disclosures. As a result, no meaningful financial resilience assessment can be constructed from the available information. A score cannot be assigned without at least partial revenue, profitability, or balance sheet data. Further investigation using direct company filings, commercial databases, or direct outreach to the company would be required to complete this assessment.

Risk factors: No financial data available to assess resilience, Company may be privately held with no public disclosure obligations, Research sources were unable to retrieve any financial information, Inability to verify revenue, profitability, or equity position

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report