Pusher
United Kingdom · pusher.com · 13 vendors
Pusher is a hosted service that provides real-time communication and collaboration APIs for web and mobile applications. It enables developers to easily integrate features such as in-app chat, notifications, activity streams, and live data visualizations into their products.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 0
- Digital Resilience: 5
Disruption prediction
Pusher has an estimated 11% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.
9 of Pusher's 13 vendors monitored for disruptions.
Technology vendors
- HubSpot, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Looker — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 12 more
Services catalogue
9 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 13 sub-vendors.
- WebSockets
- Building and managing real-time infrastructure for web and mobile applications
- Pusher
Insights
Last updated 2026-08-10 · revision 1
13 direct vendors, 195 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 10
- Australia: 2
- France: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Germany: 2
- Japan: 3
- South Korea: 1
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
The migration readiness score is low due to critical gaps in available data. The internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices) is unknown, which is a fundamental factor for assessing migration effort and complexity. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly stated as 'Unknown,' posing a significant challenge as high lock-in can severely impede migration. Financial stability, crucial for funding a substantial migration, is also unknown due to missing revenue and growth data. While 'Data Residency Requirements' are 'Not specified,' this introduces uncertainty rather than confirmed flexibility. The contradiction in vendor data ('Total Vendors: 0' vs. 'Vendor HQ Countries' and 'Vendor Geographic Diversity') makes it difficult to definitively assess vendor-related migration challenges. However, assuming there are vendors across 3 countries providing 19 services, this implies a potentially complex landscape for disentangling dependencies during a migration. The overall assessment is heavily weighted by the significant unknowns that prevent a clear understanding of migration feasibility and cost.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.