Qualys, Inc.

United States · owned by Independent (United States) · www.qualys.com · 18 vendors

Qualys, Inc. is a leading provider of cloud-based information security and compliance solutions, offering its Enterprise TruRisk Platform to help organizations detect, assess, and remediate cyber threats across IT systems and web applications. Founded in 1999 as one of the first SaaS security companies, Qualys serves over 10,000 subscription customers in more than 130 countries, including a large share of the Forbes Global 2000. The company provides a broad range of cybersecurity tools including vulnerability management, compliance auditing, and risk management, with strategic partnerships across major cloud providers and managed service organizations.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Qualys, Inc. has an estimated 10% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

15 of Qualys, Inc.'s 18 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

4 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 18 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

18 direct vendors, 260 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 7/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Qualys demonstrates a medium level of migration readiness, primarily supported by its strong financial stability and established expertise in navigating complex global regulatory and data residency requirements. The company's consistent revenue growth provides the necessary financial capacity to fund significant migration projects. Furthermore, its current operation of a global cloud platform with data centers in numerous regions (US, EU, India, Australia, UK, Canada, Japan) and adherence to a wide array of international compliance frameworks (e.g., GDPR, FedRAMP, NIS2) indicates a deep understanding of the complexities involved in data governance and regulatory compliance during a migration. This existing expertise and infrastructure, while a strength, also highlights a potential challenge: any migration would need to meticulously replicate or enhance these extensive global data residency and compliance capabilities. The most significant unknown impacting migration readiness is the complete absence of data regarding Qualys's internal tech stack, including whether it is cloud-native, utilizes containerization, microservices, or relies on legacy monolithic architectures. This lack of information prevents a definitive assessment of the technical ease or complexity of a potential migration. While the company offers a "global cloud platform," implying a modern technology foundation, this cannot be confirmed from the provided data. The vendor landscape presents another area of uncertainty; while "Total Vendors: 0" is stated, other data points to vendor relationships (e.g., "Vendor HQ Countries: United States, India, Australia" for 20 services). The actual number of vendors and the associated lock-in risk remain unknown, which could either simplify or complicate a migration depending on the vendor concentration and contract terms. Without clarity on the internal technology architecture and specific vendor lock-in details, a higher migration readiness score cannot be fully justified, despite the strong financial and compliance foundations.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 provides assurance framework that may be relevant for Qualys' security assessments and compliance reporting services. While not universally required, it adds credibility to assurance services. Risk is medium as it's more of a competitive advantage than regulatory requirement.

Evidence: https://www.qualys.com/company

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

As a cloud-based cybersecurity service provider handling sensitive customer data and security operations, SOC2 compliance is industry standard and likely required by enterprise customers. Major enterprises typically require SOC2 Type II reports from security vendors. Non-compliance could result in loss of major customers and competitive disadvantage.

Evidence: https://www.qualys.com/company

FedRAMP — Compliant

Qualys has achieved FedRAMP High authorization, which is the highest level of FedRAMP compliance. This demonstrates strong security controls and compliance with US government requirements. Risk is low as they have already achieved compliance with this demanding standard.

Evidence: https://www.qualys.com

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

Qualys demonstrates strong financial resilience underpinned by a highly recurring, subscription-based SaaS revenue model. The company consistently generates significant free cash flow and maintains a healthy balance sheet with minimal debt, providing substantial financial flexibility. Its cloud-based security platform benefits from high customer retention rates and strong net revenue retention, which provides predictable and growing revenue streams even in uncertain macroeconomic environments. The company operates with attractive operating margins relative to peers in the cybersecurity SaaS space, reflecting disciplined cost management and the inherent scalability of its platform architecture. Qualys has historically maintained profitability on both a GAAP and non-GAAP basis, which is relatively uncommon among pure-play cybersecurity vendors and signals operational maturity. Key risks include increasing competitive pressure from larger, better-capitalized vendors such as Microsoft, CrowdStrike, and Tenable, which could compress pricing and slow customer acquisition. Additionally, Qualys's relatively concentrated product focus on vulnerability management and compliance creates some exposure to market shifts or disruption in that specific segment. Overall, the combination of recurring revenues, strong cash generation, low leverage, and a mission-critical product offering in the growing cybersecurity market supports a high financial resilience score, tempered slightly by competitive dynamics and moderate growth deceleration relative to earlier years.

Key strengths: Highly recurring subscription-based SaaS revenue model with strong customer retention, Consistent free cash flow generation and minimal debt load, GAAP and non-GAAP profitability demonstrating operational maturity, Mission-critical cybersecurity platform with high switching costs, Scalable cloud-native architecture supporting margin expansion

Risk factors: Intensifying competition from Microsoft, CrowdStrike, Tenable, and Rapid7, Revenue growth deceleration compared to earlier high-growth years, Concentrated product focus on vulnerability management and compliance, Potential pricing pressure in a consolidating cybersecurity market, Dependence on enterprise IT security budgets which can be cyclically sensitive

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report