QuickNode

United States · www.quicknode.com · 9 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 9 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-12 · revision 2

9 direct vendors, 174 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 9/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

QuickNode exhibits high migration readiness due to its modern, flexible, and cloud-oriented technical architecture. The 'Multi-cloud / Globally Distributed Network' is a significant advantage, indicating inherent adaptability and reduced dependency on a single cloud provider. The tech stack leverages modern protocols like 'gRPC', 'WebSocket', 'JSON-RPC', and 'REST APIs', alongside 'CI/CD Pipelines' for efficient deployment and management. The extensive list of API-driven products, such as 'Core RPC API', 'Streams', 'Webhooks', and 'Admin API', suggests a microservices-oriented architecture, which is highly conducive to migration. The availability of a 'QuickNode SDK' and 'QuickNode CLI' further enhances developer agility and integration capabilities. The 'ChainKit' product, designed for launching custom blockchain networks, underscores the platform's inherent flexibility and modularity. Compliance with 'SOC 2 Type II' and 'ISO 27001' standards demonstrates a mature security and governance posture, which can streamline the compliance aspects of any migration. However, certain unknowns temper the score from being perfect. 'Data Residency Requirements' are 'Not specified', which could introduce complexities depending on future regulatory mandates. The 'Regulatory Environment' is also not detailed, leaving potential compliance hurdles unaddressed. Financial stability data ('Revenue Concentration by Product', 'Revenue Concentration by Geography', 'Growth History') is missing, which is important for assessing the capacity to fund a significant migration effort. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is 'Unknown'; while the geographic diversity of vendor countries (United States, Germany, Australia) is positive, the absence of the total number of vendors makes it difficult to fully assess vendor concentration and potential lock-in. Despite these gaps, the strong technical foundation and architectural flexibility position QuickNode very well for future migrations.

Compliance

9 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

MiCA — Assessment Required

MiCA (EU Regulation 2023/1114) regulates crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), issuers of asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), and issuers of e-money tokens (EMTs) in the EU. QuickNode is a blockchain infrastructure provider, not a CASP, ART issuer, or EMT issuer. QuickNode does not custody assets, execute trades on behalf of clients, or issue crypto-assets. However, QuickNode's customers (DeFi protocols, exchanges, wallet providers, stablecoin issuers) may be subject to MiCA, and QuickNode may need to ensure its infrastructure services meet MiCA's requirements for outsourcing and ICT risk management when serving MiCA-regulated entities. The risk is Low for direct MiCA applicability but Medium for indirect obligations through customer contracts.

Evidence: https://www.quicknode.com/stablecoins, https://www.quicknode.com/financial-services, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1114

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 (Revised) is the international standard for assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information, issued by the IAASB. It is commonly used for non-financial assurance reporting, including sustainability/ESG reports, privacy compliance attestations, and controls reporting for non-US entities. QuickNode's SOC 2 Type 2 report is issued under AICPA AT-C Section 205 (US standard), not ISAE 3000. However, for EU/international customers requiring ISAE 3000-based assurance (e.g., ISAE 3402 for service organizations), QuickNode may need to consider this framework. The risk is Low because: (1) QuickNode's existing SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications provide equivalent or superior assurance for most purposes; (2) ISAE 3000 is not a regulatory requirement for QuickNode's industry; (3) demand for ISAE 3000 reports typically comes from specific enterprise customers in certain jurisdictions.

Evidence: https://www.quicknode.com/security, https://trust.quicknode.com/

CPRA — Assessment Required

QuickNode is headquartered in the United States and serves US-based consumers and businesses. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) as amended by CPRA applies to for-profit businesses that: (1) have annual gross revenues exceeding $25 million; (2) buy, sell, or share personal information of 100,000+ consumers/households annually; or (3) derive 50%+ of annual revenues from selling/sharing personal information. As a blockchain infrastructure provider processing account data, usage logs, and billing information for potentially millions of users globally (500B+ requests monthly), QuickNode likely meets at least one CCPA threshold. The risk is Medium because: (1) QuickNode likely meets revenue or data volume thresholds; (2) California residents are among its user base; (3) non-compliance penalties can reach $7,500 per intentional violation; (4) however, QuickNode primarily processes B2B data rather than direct consumer data, which may reduce scope.

Evidence: https://www.quicknode.com/privacy, https://www.quicknode.com/security, https://cppa.ca.gov/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

QuickNode appears financially resilient for a private blockchain-infrastructure company, having raised approximately $95M in equity across seed, Series A ($35M in 2022), and Series B ($60M in 2023 at an ~$800M valuation). The Series B was notably raised during the 'crypto winter,' signalling strong investor confidence and providing runway to weather crypto-market cycles. Its blue-chip investor base (Tiger Global, SoftBank, 776, 50T, Y Combinator) offers follow-on capacity. The company shows operational strength through diversified customer verticals (wallets, L1s, trading firms, DeFi, gaming, AI, Fortune 500 enterprises), chain-agnostic positioning (83+ chains, 140+ networks), and enterprise credentials (SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001). Multiple product lines including RPC, Streams, Webhooks, IPFS, SQL Explorer, Swap API, and Validator-as-a-Service enable cross-sell. However, no revenue, EBIT, or equity figures are publicly disclosed, and profitability is unknown. The business is highly correlated with crypto-market cycles and faces intense competition from Alchemy, Infura, Ankr, Chainstack, Blockdaemon, Helius, and hyperscalers. No new priced round has been announced since 2023, raising potential funding-gap concerns in a prolonged fundraising drought.

Key strengths: ~$95M total equity raised across seed, Series A, and Series B, $60M Series B at ~$800M valuation raised during crypto winter (2023), Blue-chip investor base: Tiger Global, SoftBank, 776, 50T, Y Combinator, Diversified customer verticals reducing single-segment risk, Chain-agnostic positioning across 83+ chains and 140+ networks, SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 compliance certifications, Multiple product lines enabling cross-sell and revenue diversification, 500B+ requests/month handled with 99.99% uptime SLA

Risk factors: High correlation with crypto-market cycles, Intense competition from Alchemy, Infura, Ankr, Chainstack, Blockdaemon, Helius, and hyperscalers, Customer concentration risk unknown, No public profitability data; may operate at a loss like peers, Regulatory risk from US, EU (MiCA), and Asia crypto policy, No new priced funding round since 2023; potential down-round risk, No audited financial statements publicly available

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report