RelationMonitor
Denmark · relationmonitor.dk · 33 vendors
RelationMonitor ApS is a Danish analysis and consulting firm specializing in measuring and analyzing stakeholder relations. They provide insights and tailored solutions to help clients enhance customer and employee relationships through services like customer satisfaction, churn analysis, and employee satisfaction surveys. The company focuses on delivering reliable, innovative, and easy-to-use measurements and analyses.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 6
- Digital Resilience: 5
Technology vendors
- Alchemer — Technology — United States
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 30 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 33 sub-vendors.
- Customer Feedback Platform
- RelationMonitor
Insights
Last updated 2026-03-04 · revision 5
33 direct vendors, 367 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Switzerland: 1
- Belgium: 1
- United Kingdom: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Romania: 1
- United Kingdom: 9
- Italy: 2
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
RelationMonitor exhibits low migration readiness. The reliance on 'SiteNow,' a regional Danish CMS and web hosting platform, strongly suggests a traditional, potentially monolithic architecture that is not inherently cloud-native. This would necessitate significant re-platforming or re-architecting efforts for a successful migration, increasing complexity and cost. The absence of information regarding the regulatory environment and data residency requirements creates substantial unknowns, which are critical for planning a compliant and legally sound migration, especially given operations in Denmark (implying EU GDPR considerations). Furthermore, the company's financial capacity to fund a potentially large-scale migration is unclear due to missing revenue and growth data. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is explicitly unknown, which is a major concern; if the 111 services are deeply integrated with a few critical vendors, disentanglement could be highly complex and costly. The actual number of distinct vendors is also not provided, making it difficult to assess vendor concentration. No clear opportunities for migration readiness are evident from the provided data. A migration would likely be complex, costly, and fraught with unquantified risks.
Compliance
3 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.
GDPR (source) — Assessment Required
GDPR applies with HIGH certainty as RelationMonitor is headquartered in Denmark (EU member state) and processes personal data through customer satisfaction surveys, employee engagement surveys, and stakeholder relationship analysis. Non-compliance carries severe penalties up to 4% of annual turnover or €20M. As a data analytics company handling personal data from surveys, they face high exposure to GDPR requirements including data subject rights, consent management, data processing agreements, and privacy by design. The risk is elevated due to their core business model involving personal data processing.
SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required
SOC2 may be relevant as RelationMonitor provides data analytics services that likely involve cloud-based data processing and storage of client data. While not mandatory, SOC2 certification would demonstrate security controls for their service delivery. Risk is medium as lack of SOC2 could impact client confidence and competitive positioning, especially with larger enterprise clients who may require such certifications from their service providers.
ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required
ISO 27001 is highly relevant for RelationMonitor as they handle sensitive personal data through surveys and analytics. While not legally mandatory, it demonstrates systematic information security management which is increasingly expected by clients, especially in light of GDPR requirements. Risk is medium as lack of certification could impact client confidence and competitive positioning, and poor information security could lead to data breaches with severe GDPR penalties.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.