Remote Technology, Inc.

United States · remote.com · 7 vendors

Remote Technology, Inc. is an all-in-one HR and payroll platform that enables companies to find, hire, manage, and pay their entire team globally. It provides services such as HRIS, payroll, international employment, and contractor management, ensuring compliance with local regulations. The company's mission is to create opportunity everywhere by empowering employers to hire the best talent regardless of location.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

4 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 7 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 1

7 direct vendors, 139 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 7/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Remote Technology, Inc. exhibits a high level of migration readiness, scoring 70. A key strength is its highly modern and cloud-native technology stack, featuring Kubernetes, Docker, and Amazon Web Services (AWS), along with GraphQL and REST APIs. This architecture strongly suggests a containerized and likely microservices-based approach, which significantly reduces technical hurdles for migration by enabling portability and scalability. The company's 'Remote API' and 'Remote Embedded' products further highlight a modular and extensible platform, highly conducive to phased migrations and seamless integration with new systems, thereby avoiding monolithic dependencies. Additionally, Remote's core business involves managing complex global employment and compliance across 90+ countries. While regulatory compliance can add complexity to migration, their existing expertise and 'Compliance Watchtower' product indicate they are well-equipped to navigate and maintain compliance during any transition. However, the readiness score is impacted by critical data gaps: there is no information on financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history), which is essential for assessing the capacity to fund a significant migration effort. Specific data residency requirements are also not provided, which could introduce substantial constraints and complexity for a global company handling sensitive HR and payroll data. Similar to resilience, the vendor data is contradictory ('Total Vendors: 0' vs. 'Total Services: 7' from vendors in 2 countries). Assuming there are vendors for these 7 services, the 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown. If these services are critical and provided by a limited number of vendors, disentanglement could pose a challenge and increase migration complexity. The moderate geographic diversity of vendors (2 countries) is a neutral factor.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Compliant

Remote Technology, Inc. has publicly confirmed SOC 2 Type 2 compliance, which is independently audited and verified. The Trust Center explicitly lists 'SOC 2 Type 2' as a current compliance certification, with the report available upon request. SOC 2 Type 2 is the gold standard for cloud service providers and SaaS companies, covering the Trust Service Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) over an audit period. Risk is Low because: (1) the certification is current and independently verified; (2) continuous monitoring via Secureframe is in place; (3) the company has demonstrated mature security controls (penetration testing, incident response, access controls, encryption). The primary residual risk is the gap between audit periods and any emerging control deficiencies.

Evidence: https://trust.remote.com/, https://remote.com/why-remote/security-compliance, https://remote.com

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 (Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information) is the international standard for non-financial assurance reporting. It is the international equivalent framework underlying SOC 2 reports issued outside the United States (e.g., in Europe, where ISAE 3000 / ISAE 3402 are used instead of AICPA SOC standards). Remote has SOC 2 Type 2 (AICPA framework), which is the US equivalent. For EU/international clients, Remote may be asked to provide ISAE 3000-based assurance reports. No public evidence of a standalone ISAE 3000 report was found. Risk is Low because Remote's SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications provide substantial equivalent assurance, and ISAE 3000 is not a mandatory regulatory requirement but rather a client/market expectation in certain jurisdictions.

Evidence: https://trust.remote.com/, https://remote.com/why-remote/security-compliance

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 applies to 'digital providers' — specifically online marketplaces, online search engines, and cloud computing services — as well as ICT service management (managed service providers). Remote Technology, Inc. operates a SaaS-based global HR and payroll platform, which may qualify as a 'managed service provider' or 'digital provider' under NIS2 Annex I/II, particularly given its API-first infrastructure, integrations with enterprise HR systems (Workday, BambooHR, Personio), and its role as critical employment infrastructure for hundreds of companies. Remote clearly exceeds the NIS2 size thresholds (50+ employees, €10M+ turnover — Remote raised $300M+ in funding and serves thousands of enterprise clients globally). However, the precise NIS2 sector classification (whether Remote falls under 'ICT service management' as an Important Entity or 'digital infrastructure') requires a formal legal assessment under the applicable EU member state's NIS2 transposition law, as Remote has EU operations (evidenced by EU-hosted content infrastructure and EU employee/client data processing). Risk is Medium because non-compliance with NIS2 can result in fines up to €10M or 2% of global turnover for Important Entities, and enforcement is ramping up across EU member states.

Evidence: https://trust.remote.com/, https://remote.com/why-remote/security-compliance, https://remote.com/about

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Remote Technology, Inc. demonstrates strong financial resilience despite being a private company with limited public financial disclosure. The company has shown exceptional revenue growth, scaling from approximately $30M ARR in 2021 to a reported $300M ARR in 2023, representing roughly 10x growth over two years. This rapid expansion is supported by nearly $500M in equity capital raised across seed through Series C rounds, with a peak valuation of $3B at the April 2022 Series C led by SoftBank Vision Fund 2. The investor base includes blue-chip firms such as Accel, Sequoia, Base10, General Catalyst, and Two Sigma Ventures, providing long-duration capital support. The company's owned-entity model across 80+ countries provides a competitive moat and scaling economics that lighter-weight competitors cannot match. CEO Job van der Voort has publicly stated Remote reached cash-flow break-even/positive in parts of the business in 2023-2024, though absolute operating profit numbers remain undisclosed. The subscription-based recurring revenue model with high gross retention in the EOR category, combined with a diversified blue-chip customer base including GitLab, DoorDash, HelloFresh, Anthropic, and Datadog, reduces single-customer concentration risk. However, resilience is tempered by significant risks including intense competition from Deel (valued at ~$12B+), regulatory pressure on EOR business models in multiple jurisdictions, macro sensitivity to tech/startup customers who contracted global hiring in 2023-2024, and potential down-round risk given the 2022 $3B valuation was set at peak tech multiples. A ~5% layoff in early 2023 signals cost discipline but also market headwinds.

Key strengths: ~$496M+ in total equity capital raised across funding rounds, 10x ARR growth from ~$30M to ~$300M in approximately two years, Owned legal entities in 80+ countries providing competitive moat, Blue-chip diversified customer base (GitLab, DoorDash, Anthropic, Datadog, Heineken), Long-duration capital from tier-1 investors (Accel, Sequoia, SoftBank, General Catalyst), SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO 27001 certifications supporting enterprise sales, Reported cash-flow break-even/positive in parts of business in 2023-2024, Recurring subscription revenue with high gross retention

Risk factors: Financial opacity as private company with no audited public financials, Intense competition from Deel (~$12B+ valuation) and Rippling, Papaya, Oyster, Ongoing legal disputes with Deel (2024-2025), Regulatory tightening of EOR rules in Germany, UAE, Australia, Customer base skews to tech/startups which contracted hiring in 2023-2024, Down-round risk given 2022 $3B valuation at peak tech multiples, FX and working-capital risk from operating payroll in 80+ currencies, ~5% workforce reduction in early 2023 signals market headwinds

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report