Riscovery ApS

Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · riscovery.com · 37 vendors

Riscovery is a Danish RegTech company that provides a third-party risk management platform designed to help organizations manage and mitigate risks associated with their vendors, suppliers, and other third-party relationships.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Riscovery ApS has an estimated 17% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

13 of Riscovery ApS's 37 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 48

37 direct vendors, 280 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 4/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Riscovery ApS exhibits low to medium migration readiness. A critical challenge is the complete lack of information regarding the internal tech stack and key technologies, making it impossible to assess the current architecture's compatibility with modern cloud environments (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices). This absence of data suggests a potentially legacy or monolithic architecture that would require significant refactoring. The complex and 'Assessment Required' status for GDPR, NIS2, SOC2, and ISO 27001 presents substantial regulatory hurdles that would need to be addressed and integrated into any migration strategy, increasing complexity and cost. Strict GDPR data residency requirements, coupled with potential client-specific data localization needs for RegTech services, significantly constrain choices for new infrastructure and necessitate careful planning for data transfers and storage. The high number of 'Total Services: 48' implies a complex web of dependencies and integrations, which could complicate disentanglement and re-platforming efforts. While vendor geographic diversity is good for resilience, a large number of services could also indicate numerous vendor relationships and contracts to manage during a migration. The 'Vendor Lock-in Risk' is unknown, posing a potential hidden challenge. The lack of detailed financial data also prevents an assessment of the company's ability to fund a potentially complex and costly migration.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 may be relevant if Riscovery provides assurance services or compliance reporting that requires independent verification.

ISAE 3000 may be relevant if Riscovery provides assurance services or compliance reporting that requires independent verification. Risk is lower as this is typically optional unless specifically required by clients or regulatory frameworks. Non-compliance would primarily impact service credibility rather than result in penalties.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is highly relevant for RegTech companies handling sensitive compliance data. While not legally mandatory, it's often required by enterprise clients and demonstrates information security maturity.

ISO 27001 is highly relevant for RegTech companies handling sensitive compliance data. While not legally mandatory, it's often required by enterprise clients and demonstrates information security maturity. In regulated industries, clients may require ISO 27001 certification from vendors. Lack of certification could impact competitive position.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is relevant for RegTech companies providing cloud-based compliance services to clients. While not mandatory, SOC2 Type II certification is often required by enterprise clients for vendor risk management.

SOC2 is relevant for RegTech companies providing cloud-based compliance services to clients. While not mandatory, SOC2 Type II certification is often required by enterprise clients for vendor risk management. Lack of SOC2 could limit business opportunities with large clients, particularly in financial services.

Financials

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report