Roskilde Kommune
Denmark · owned by Independent (Denmark) · roskilde.dk · 13 vendors
Roskilde Kommune is a Danish municipal government entity that provides public services, administration, and governance for the Roskilde municipality. The organization manages local government services including citizen services, democracy and influence, leisure and communities, experiences and culture.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 46
- Digital Resilience: 6
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Magenta — Denmark
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- and 10 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 2
13 direct vendors, 183 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 7
- Denmark: 6
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United States: 125
- Belgium: 6
- New Zealand: 1
Migration Readiness: 1/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Roskilde Kommune exhibits low migration readiness. The primary challenge is the reliance on a legacy Umbraco CMS (version 6.x), which is not compatible with modern cloud-native architectures (e.g., containerization, microservices) and would require a complete re-platforming rather than a straightforward migration. The regulatory environment is highly complex, with stringent requirements under NIS2 and GDPR, including a strong preference for data residency within the EU. These regulations add significant overhead, cost, and complexity to any migration, requiring meticulous planning for security, compliance, and data integrity. The 'Unknown' vendor lock-in risk is a major impediment, particularly with the core municipal web CMS being a KMD/Umbraco platform, suggesting deep integration and potential customization that would be difficult and costly to disentangle. With 17 services, there are likely numerous integrations that would need to be re-architected. While the company has a stable financial position, which could fund a migration, the technical debt, regulatory hurdles, and potential vendor lock-in present substantial challenges that place migration readiness at a very low level.
Financials
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.