Ørsted A/S

Denmark · owned by Finansministeriet, Departementet (Denmark) · www.orsted.com · 62 vendors

Ørsted A/S is a Danish multinational energy company and one of the world's largest developers of offshore wind energy. Originally known as DONG Energy (Danish Oil and Natural Gas), the company rebranded to Ørsted in 2017 following a strategic transformation away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy. It develops, constructs, and operates offshore and onshore wind farms, solar farms, and energy storage facilities across Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 33

62 direct vendors, 433 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Ørsted's migration readiness is low, primarily due to a highly complex regulatory and data residency environment. As a Danish company operating in the EU, it is subject to stringent GDPR requirements. More critically, the NIS2 Directive applies as an "Essential Entity" in the energy sector, imposing strict cybersecurity and supply chain security obligations. The data explicitly states that "Critical infrastructure data may require EU residency under NIS2" and "Operational data for energy systems may have sector-specific residency requirements." These data localization requirements severely restrict migration options, particularly to global public cloud providers outside the EU/EEA, adding significant complexity, cost, and potential architectural constraints. A major impediment is the lack of available data on Ørsted's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native, containerization, microservices, legacy systems), making it difficult to assess the technical effort required for migration. The recent decline in revenue and employee numbers suggests potential financial constraints, which could limit the budget and resources for a complex migration initiative. While the geographic diversity of vendors (14 unique countries) suggests a potentially broad vendor ecosystem (assuming the 'Total Vendors: 0' data point is an error given 'Total Services: 83'), the "Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown" status means the actual level of dependency on specific vendors or proprietary systems is unclear, adding uncertainty to migration planning.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Ørsted's financial resilience is mixed. On the positive side, the company benefits from majority Danish state ownership (>50%), providing strategic backing and historically favorable financing access. It holds an investment-grade credit rating (historically BBB+/Baa1 range) and maintains a strong European asset base with long-dated, largely contracted revenue via CfDs and PPAs. As the global #1 in offshore wind by installed capacity, it has significant scale advantages. However, resilience has deteriorated meaningfully since 2023. The company took approximately DKK 28.4bn in impairments on its US offshore wind portfolio, cancelling Ocean Wind 1 and 2 in New Jersey, and reported a large net loss. Credit ratings came under negative pressure in 2023-24. In 2024, Ørsted announced a strategic reset including a ~25% capex cut, dividend suspension through 2025, and ~800 headcount reductions. In 2025, additional US setbacks emerged under the Trump administration (halting new offshore wind leasing, issues with Revolution Wind and Sunrise Wind), prompting a large ~DKK 60bn rights issue to shore up the balance sheet. The dividend suspension and rights issue signal ongoing balance-sheet stress, offsetting the sovereign-backed strengths.

Key strengths: Majority Danish state ownership (>50%) providing strategic backing, Investment-grade credit rating (historically BBB+/Baa1), Global #1 in offshore wind by installed capacity, Long-dated contracted revenue via CfDs and PPAs, Strong European asset base

Risk factors: US offshore wind exposure with cancelled projects and political headwinds, DKK 28.4bn impairments on US portfolio in 2023, Dividend suspended through 2025, ~DKK 60bn rights issue in mid-2025 signals balance sheet stress, High leverage and interest-rate sensitivity on long-duration assets, Supply-chain and cost inflation compressing project IRRs, Concentration risk in offshore wind economics, Execution risk on multi-GW pipeline (Hornsea 3, Greater Changhua)

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report