SKI – Statens og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S
Denmark · owned by Finansministeriet, Departementet (Denmark) · www.ski.dk · 12 vendors
SKI (Statens og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice) is a Danish public procurement company that establishes and manages framework agreements on behalf of the Danish state and municipalities. It helps public sector organizations purchase goods and services efficiently and in compliance with public procurement law. SKI is jointly owned by the Danish state and Local Government Denmark (KL).
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 8
- Digital Resilience: 6
- Financial Resilience: 8
Technology vendors
- Adobe Inc. — Technology — United States
- Power BI — Technology — United States
- Stripe, Inc. — Financial Services — United States
- and 19 more
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3
12 direct vendors, 199 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Sweden: 1
- United States: 9
- Canada: 1
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- United Kingdom: 5
- Australia: 3
- Israel: 1
Migration Readiness: 5/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Cannot assess without specific company information. This is a placeholder score.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: revenue DKK 275M, EBIT DKK 17.6M, equity DKK 216M
- 2024: revenue DKK 242M, EBIT DKK -28.5M, equity DKK 203M
- 2023: revenue DKK 226M, EBIT DKK 41.2M, equity DKK 224M
Financial Resilience Score: 8/10
Statens og Kommunernes Indkøbsservice A/S (SKI) is a state-owned procurement company jointly owned by the Danish State (via the Ministry of Finance) and Local Government Denmark (KL). This ownership structure provides an exceptionally stable institutional foundation, as SKI's revenues are derived from framework agreements and procurement services delivered to Danish public authorities — a captive and highly stable customer base that is not subject to typical commercial market volatility. SKI operates as a non-profit-oriented entity whose primary mandate is to generate savings and efficiency for the Danish public sector through centralized procurement. Its revenue model is based on administrative fees charged to suppliers and public buyers participating in its framework agreements, which cover billions of DKK in annual public procurement spend. This model provides recurring, predictable income streams that are structurally insulated from economic downturns. The company maintains a solid equity base relative to its operational scale, and as a publicly anchored institution it faces minimal refinancing or liquidity risk. There is no meaningful exposure to private-sector credit risk or demand cyclicality. Regulatory and political risk is low given SKI's embedded role in Danish public administration, though changes in public procurement policy or centralization strategy could affect its mandate over the long term. Key risks include potential political decisions to decentralize procurement, changes in EU public procurement directives that could alter framework agreement structures, and operational risks related to digital transformation of procurement platforms. Overall, SKI represents a very low-risk, institutionally backed entity with strong financial resilience.
Key strengths: State and municipal co-ownership providing institutional stability, Captive public-sector customer base with no commercial demand risk, Recurring fee-based revenue model tied to framework agreement usage, Strong equity position relative to operational liabilities, Non-profit orientation reduces pressure for aggressive financial risk-taking, Embedded role in Danish public procurement infrastructure
Risk factors: Political risk of decentralization of public procurement away from SKI, Changes in EU public procurement directives affecting framework agreement structures, Digital transformation and IT platform investment requirements, Limited revenue diversification outside Danish public sector, Dependency on continued political support for centralized procurement model
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.