Smooth Robotics
Denmark · owned by JUUL HOLDING ApS (Denmark) · smooth-robotics.com · 10 vendors
Smooth Robotics develops user-friendly software and hardware solutions for robotic welding, primarily for collaborative robots (cobots). Their flagship product, SmoothTool, simplifies automated welding with an intuitive no-code programming interface. This solution aims to make robotic welding accessible, improve productivity, and enhance safety in manufacturing environments.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 30
- Digital Resilience: 5
Technology vendors
- Google LLC — Technology — United States
- HubSpot, Inc. — Technology — United States
- NVIDIA Corporation — Technology — United States
- and 7 more
Services catalogue
1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 10 sub-vendors.
- Welding automation software
Insights
Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 1
10 direct vendors, 194 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Belgium: 2
- Australia: 1
- United States: 6
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Canada: 4
- New Zealand: 1
- Singapore: 1
Migration Readiness: 4/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Smooth Robotics exhibits a low to medium migration readiness. While the internal tech stack, comprising WordPress, Divi, Google Tag Manager, and HubSpot, is relatively common and has established cloud hosting solutions (HubSpot itself being a SaaS), the core product technologies present significant migration challenges. The reliance on URCap, industrial communication protocols like Ethernet/IP and Modbus TCP, and hardware integrations (RetroFit Kit) suggests a substantial on-premise or edge computing component that is not inherently cloud-native or easily containerized. Migrating such industrial control systems and hardware-dependent solutions typically requires specialized approaches and may not fully align with a pure cloud-native strategy. Several critical unknowns further reduce the migration readiness score. The absence of information regarding the regulatory environment means potential compliance requirements that could complicate or restrict cloud migration are not accounted for. Similarly, the lack of data on financial stability (revenue concentration, growth history) makes it difficult to assess the company's capacity to fund a potentially complex and costly migration effort. While "Data Residency Requirements: Not specified" offers some flexibility in choosing cloud regions, the "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is explicitly "Unknown," which is a significant concern given the 12 services utilized. Without knowing the nature of these vendor contracts and dependencies, the potential for lock-in to existing platforms or technologies remains a substantial barrier to a smooth migration. The contradictory "Total Vendors: 0" makes it hard to assess vendor concentration, but the existence of 12 services implies multiple dependencies that could lead to migration complexities.
Financials
Three-year financials
- 2025: gross profit DKK 8.23M, EBIT DKK -2.97M, equity DKK -42.5K
- 2024: gross profit DKK 8.81M, EBIT DKK -209K, equity DKK 995K
- 2023: gross profit DKK 6.63M, EBIT DKK -98.5K, equity DKK 1.32M
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.