Soft-Team A/S
Denmark · soft-team.dk · 11 vendors
Soft-Team I/S is a leading provider of payroll and crew management software solutions for the maritime industry. The company develops, delivers, and supports software for ship owners, ship managers, and crew managers globally. They also offer competent seafarer payroll and accounting support, leveraging extensive experience in IT and business aspects of maritime crewing.
Resilience scores
- Digital Sovereignty: 18
- Digital Resilience: 5
Technology vendors
- Looks Awesome — Ukraine
- Netlify, Inc. — Technology — United States
- The Apache Software Foundation — Technology — United States
- and 8 more
Services catalogue
2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 11 sub-vendors.
- billing software
- Customer self-service portals
Insights
Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 1
11 direct vendors, 152 subvendors
Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Italy: 1
- United Kingdom: 1
- United States: 6
Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)
- Japan: 2
- Austria: 1
- Australia: 2
Migration Readiness: 3/10
Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.
Migration readiness is difficult to assess due to a substantial lack of information. There is no data available on the company's internal tech stack (e.g., cloud-native adoption, containerization, microservices architecture), which is a critical factor for migration complexity. Financial stability and the ability to fund a migration are also unknown due to missing revenue and growth data. While "Data Residency Requirements" are not specified, this could imply flexibility or an unaddressed area. The vendor landscape includes 10 services from vendors with diverse geographic locations (5 unique countries for HQ and owner countries). While this diversity aids resilience, it could introduce complexity in coordinating a migration across multiple providers and regions. The actual number of unique vendors for these 10 services is not provided, making it impossible to accurately assess vendor lock-in risk based on the number of vendors. Given the significant unknowns regarding the core technical and financial aspects, and the unquantified vendor lock-in, the company's migration readiness is assessed as low.
Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.