Spaceship

United States · www.spaceship.com · 4 vendors

Spaceship is an ICANN Accredited Domain Registrar and web services platform that provides domains, web hosting, email, SSL certificates, and other online tools. It aims to help users build and manage their digital presence with a focus on simplicity and integrated management through its "Unbox" feature. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

2 services in catalogue across 2 categories; runs on 4 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-30 · revision 5

4 direct vendors, 59 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 3/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Spaceship's migration readiness is assessed as very low due to an overwhelming lack of information across all key readiness factors. Key weaknesses include: 1. Tech Stack Unknowns: There is no information available regarding the company's internal tech stack, including whether it's cloud-native, uses containerization, or microservices. This is a fundamental gap that prevents any meaningful assessment of technical migration complexity. 2. Regulatory and Data Residency Hurdles: The 'Assessment Required' status for GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, and ISO 27001, along with the inability to determine specific data residency requirements, indicates potential significant regulatory and compliance challenges during migration. Moving data and applications to new environments would require careful consideration of these unknown requirements, potentially increasing costs and timelines. 3. Financial Capacity Unknown: The absence of data on revenue concentration and growth history makes it impossible to assess the company's financial stability and its capacity to fund a potentially costly and complex migration initiative. 4. Vendor Lock-in Ambiguity: The data states 'Total Vendors: 0' but 'Total Services: 4.' This contradiction creates significant ambiguity. If the 4 services are provided by unidentified external vendors, there is an unknown but potentially high vendor lock-in risk due to unassessed contracts and dependencies. If these services are entirely internal, the lack of tech stack details still makes it difficult to assess the ease of migrating these internal systems. The limited vendor geographic diversity (1 unique country) also suggests potential concentration if external vendors are involved. If 'Total Vendors: 0' is interpreted as a complete absence of external vendor dependencies, this would be a significant advantage, eliminating external contract complexities and vendor-specific migration challenges; however, this interpretation is highly speculative given 'Total Services: 4'.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

ISO 27001 is valuable for any organization handling sensitive information, regardless of industry. While not legally mandated, it's increasingly expected by customers and partners. Medium risk as lack of certification could impact business opportunities and customer confidence, though penalties are market-driven rather than regulatory.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

SOC2 is critical for service organizations, especially those handling customer data or providing cloud services. Without knowing the business model, cannot assess applicability. Medium risk as SOC2 non-compliance can impact customer trust and business relationships, though it's not legally mandated.

HIPAA (source) — Assessment Required

Without knowing the industry, cannot determine if Spaceship is a covered entity or business associate under HIPAA. If healthcare-related, HIPAA violations can result in significant penalties ($100-$50,000 per violation, up to $1.5M annually). Medium risk due to uncertainty about healthcare involvement.

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: null/10

No financial data was successfully extracted from the research report. The report indicates multiple failed attempts to fetch the Spaceship (spaceship.com) website and conduct financial searches, resulting in no usable financial, operational, or structural data being returned. Without revenue, profitability, balance sheet, or operational metrics, a meaningful financial resilience assessment cannot be completed. The repeated fetch failures suggest either access restrictions, paywalled content, or technical issues during the research process. A reliable score cannot be assigned under these conditions.

Risk factors: No financial data available to assess resilience, Research process failed to retrieve any structured financial information, Company may be private with limited public disclosure, Multiple data fetch attempts were unsuccessful

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report