Speedcast

Australia · www.speedcast.com · 26 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

1 service in catalogue across 1 category; runs on 26 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-05-22 · revision 2

26 direct vendors, 303 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 5/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Speedcast exhibits medium migration readiness, primarily driven by its existing modern technology foundation. The company utilizes Amazon Web Services (AWS) and has an API-enabled cloud-native platform architecture, indicating a strategic move towards cloud adoption. The implementation of SD-WAN further enhances network flexibility and agility, which are crucial for migration. However, several significant data gaps impact the overall readiness score. There is no information available on financial stability, which is critical for funding migration initiatives. Regulatory environment and data residency requirements are also unspecified, posing potential complexities for migration planning. Furthermore, while vendor relationships show geographic diversity across 5 countries, the exact number of vendors and the specific vendor lock-in risk are unknown, which could present unforeseen challenges during a migration. The presence of MPLS and VPN in the internal tech stack, while not inherently legacy, might require modernization efforts to fully align with a cloud-native, microservices-oriented migration strategy. The absence of explicit mention of containerization or microservices also suggests there may be further architectural evolution needed for optimal cloud migration.

Compliance

4 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Assessment Required

As a global telecommunications and IT services provider handling sensitive customer data and operating critical infrastructure, ISO 27001 certification would be expected for information security management. Medium risk due to industry standards expectations and customer requirements, but no evidence found of current certification status.

Evidence: https://www.speedcast.com/about-us/global-reach/

GDPR (source) — Assessment Required

Speedcast operates globally with significant presence in Europe (Aberdeen, Biddinghuizen teleports) and processes personal data of employees, customers, and suppliers across EU/EEA. While they have a privacy policy indicating data processing awareness, no specific GDPR compliance evidence was found. Medium risk due to global operations likely involving EU personal data processing, but enforcement varies by jurisdiction and company size.

Evidence: https://www.speedcast.com/privacy-policy/

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

As a cloud services and IT infrastructure provider serving enterprise customers globally, Speedcast likely requires SOC2 compliance for customer assurance. They provide cloud solutions, network management, and IT services that would typically require SOC2 certification. Medium risk due to customer expectations in enterprise market and competitive requirements.

Evidence: https://www.speedcast.com/our-solution/cloud/, https://www.speedcast.com/our-solution/network-management/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 5/10

Speedcast's financial resilience is difficult to assess definitively because the company has been privately held by Centerbridge Partners since emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in March 2021 and no longer publishes audited financial statements. The 2020 Chapter 11 filing (S.D. Tex. Case 20-32243) demonstrated that the company's prior aggressive roll-up acquisition strategy combined with heavy debt (~US$700M+ net debt pre-petition) was fragile in industry downturns, particularly when oil & gas capex declined and COVID-19 hit the cruise sector. Post-emergence, the balance sheet was substantially deleveraged through debt-to-equity conversion held by Centerbridge and certain prepetition creditors. Strategic positioning with LEO partnerships (Starlink Authorized Reseller/Integrator since 2022, Eutelsat OneWeb) and diversification across maritime, energy, cruise, mining, government, and NGO end-markets provides revenue stability. However, LEO resale typically carries lower margins than legacy VSAT, and the lack of public transparency means external verification of resilience is impossible without paid ASIC filings or commercial databases.

Key strengths: Global scale with access to 95+ satellites and 35+ teleports, Diversified end-markets reduce single-industry concentration risk, Authorized reseller/integrator for Starlink and Eutelsat OneWeb LEO services, Backing of Centerbridge Partners provides capital flexibility, Substantially deleveraged capital structure post-2021 Chapter 11 emergence

Risk factors: Disruption from LEO constellations with lower resale margins, Cyclical exposure to oil & gas capex (historically 35-40% of revenue), Cruise industry exposure highly impacted by external shocks like COVID, Lack of public financial transparency as PE-owned private firm, History of fragile capital structure leading to 2020 Chapter 11 bankruptcy, Customer concentration risk if major clients defect to direct Starlink/OneWeb relationships

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report