Statuspage (an Atlassian company)

Australia · statuspage.io · 23 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

3 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 23 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-08-11 · revision 7

23 direct vendors, 266 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 10/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Statuspage exhibits very high migration readiness, primarily driven by its cutting-edge, cloud-native technology stack. The use of Amazon Web Services (AWS), a microservices architecture, Kubernetes, Docker, and Terraform (for infrastructure-as-code) signifies a highly modular, portable, and automated environment. This architecture minimizes dependencies on proprietary systems and facilitates re-platforming or migration to alternative cloud providers if needed. The company's strong financial health, with substantial and growing revenue, ensures ample resources are available to fund complex migration projects. Furthermore, Statuspage's robust regulatory compliance framework, including adherence to GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, and the Australian Privacy Act, along with its established Data Residency program (supporting US, EU, Australia), significantly reduces the compliance burden and complexity associated with data transfers during migration. While 'Vendor Lock-in Risk: Unknown' is a data gap, the underlying open-source and cloud-agnostic technologies (Kubernetes, Docker, PostgreSQL, Ruby on Rails, React) suggest a low inherent vendor lock-in at the technology level. The geographic diversity of implied vendors (5 unique countries) also suggests a healthy ecosystem rather than heavy reliance on a single vendor. The only potential challenge could be the 'Partially Compliant' status for FedRAMP, which might complicate migrations for specific US federal government customers, but this is a niche requirement and does not detract from overall high readiness.

Compliance

10 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

CPRA — Compliant

Atlassian processes personal data of California residents and is subject to CCPA/CPRA as a large enterprise exceeding all thresholds (annual gross revenue >$25M, processes data of >100,000 consumers, derives >50% revenue from selling personal information — at least the first two thresholds are clearly met). Risk is Medium because: (1) CPRA introduced enhanced requirements including sensitive personal information rights, data minimization, and the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) with expanded enforcement authority; (2) Atlassian's Privacy Policy includes US State privacy disclosures addressing CCPA/CPRA rights; (3) opt-out of sale/sharing mechanisms are documented; (4) ongoing CPPA rulemaking introduces new compliance requirements. Risk is not High because Atlassian has documented CCPA/CPRA compliance measures.

Evidence: https://www.atlassian.com/legal/privacy-policy, https://www.atlassian.com/trust, https://www.atlassian.com/legal/cookies

SOC 2 (source) — Compliant

Atlassian is a major cloud services provider with a well-established Trust Center and publicly documented compliance program. SOC2 (Service Organization Control 2) is a standard compliance requirement for cloud SaaS providers of Atlassian's scale and enterprise customer base. Atlassian's Trust Center explicitly references SOC2 reports. Risk is Low because: (1) Atlassian has maintained SOC2 compliance for multiple years as a core enterprise requirement; (2) SOC2 Type II reports are available to customers under NDA through the Trust Center; (3) Atlassian's size, resources, and compliance maturity make ongoing SOC2 compliance highly likely; (4) enterprise customers routinely request and receive SOC2 reports from Atlassian. The primary residual risk is that SOC2 reports are product-specific and customers should confirm Statuspage is covered in the relevant report scope.

Evidence: https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance, https://www.atlassian.com/trust, https://www.atlassian.com/software/statuspage

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 (International Standard on Assurance Engagements) is relevant when organizations provide assurance reports on non-financial information to third parties. For Atlassian/Statuspage, ISAE 3000 could be relevant in the context of: (1) ISAE 3402 (equivalent to SOC1) for service organizations affecting financial reporting; (2) ISAE 3000-based assurance reports on sustainability/ESG disclosures; (3) Privacy assurance reports. Risk is Low because: (1) Atlassian's primary assurance framework is SOC2 (AICPA) rather than ISAE 3000 (IAASB); (2) ISAE 3000 is more commonly required in European contexts; (3) Atlassian's existing SOC2 and ISO certifications provide equivalent or overlapping assurance; (4) no specific ISAE 3000 requirement has been identified for Statuspage's industry or customer base. The framework is not a primary compliance requirement for a SaaS incident communication platform.

Evidence: https://www.atlassian.com/trust/compliance, https://www.atlassian.com/trust

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

Statuspage itself does not report stand-alone financials, so its financial resilience is effectively that of its parent, Atlassian Corporation. Atlassian is a large, NASDAQ-listed SaaS company with approximately US$6.6B in trailing-twelve-month revenue and 26% YoY growth, a strong balance sheet with multi-billion dollars in cash and marketable securities, and highly recurring subscription revenue (93-95% of total). This provides Statuspage with substantial financial backing, R&D resources, and enterprise distribution channels through Atlassian's broader portfolio (Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management). While Atlassian's GAAP operating income has been negative in recent years due to heavy stock-based compensation and acquisitions (e.g., Loom for ~US$975M), non-GAAP operating margins exceed 20% and the company is highly cash-generative. Statuspage benefits from Atlassian's self-serve SaaS motion with low CAC and a marquee customer base including Dropbox, DigitalOcean, Twilio, Coinbase, Shopify, and Reddit. However, as a small product within a large portfolio, Statuspage's strategic priority could shift, and it faces growing competition from modern incident-management platforms like Incident.io and Better Stack. The score of 8 reflects strong parent-company support offset by lack of standalone disclosure and competitive pressure.

Key strengths: Backed by NASDAQ-listed Atlassian with US$6.6B TTM revenue and 26% growth, Highly recurring SaaS subscription revenue model (93-95% of parent revenue), Strong balance sheet with multi-billion dollars in cash and marketable securities, Marquee enterprise customer base (Dropbox, Twilio, Coinbase, Shopify, Reddit), Integrated into Atlassian's incident management suite alongside Jira Service Management and Opsgenie, Self-serve motion with low customer acquisition costs, 85%+ of Fortune 500 are paying Atlassian customers

Risk factors: No independent balance sheet or standalone financial disclosure, Small product within large portfolio; strategic priorities can shift, Growing competition from Better Stack, Instatus, StatusGator, FireHydrant, Incident.io, Competitors bundling status pages with modern incident management may erode standalone demand, Atlassian GAAP profitability pressured by heavy stock-based compensation, Atlassian's strategic focus is on Jira, Confluence, JSM, Loom, and Rovo AI rather than Statuspage

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report