Supabase, Inc.

United States · owned by Independent (United States) · supabase.com · 23 vendors

Supabase is an open-source developer platform that provides a suite of tools to build scalable and secure backends. It is often positioned as an alternative to Google's Firebase.

Resilience scores

Disruption prediction

Supabase, Inc. has a 100% probability of disruption in the next 6 months.

All systems operational (last checked 2026-09-18 14:55 UTC)

14 of Supabase, Inc.'s 23 vendors monitored for disruptions.

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

9 services in catalogue across 4 categories; runs on 23 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-07-12 · revision 15

23 direct vendors, 260 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Supabase exhibits a high level of migration readiness, scoring 83. This is primarily driven by its highly modern, cloud-native, and open-source-centric tech stack. The architecture leverages containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) and microservices principles (Deno Edge Functions), making components highly portable. The core database, PostgreSQL, is open-source, and Supabase actively develops open-source, self-hostable alternatives like Multigres, which aims for Vitess-grade horizontal scaling. This commitment to open-source significantly reduces vendor lock-in at the core platform level. Financially, Supabase is in a strong position with projected revenue of USD 100M in 2025, providing ample resources to fund any necessary migration efforts. The company's operation in 16+ global regions allows customers to choose data locations, which is a significant advantage for addressing data residency requirements during a migration. This regional flexibility means that data can be strategically moved or replicated to comply with various local laws. Challenges for migration primarily stem from existing dependencies on specific cloud providers for hosting and deployment, such as AWS, Fly.io (for Edge Functions), and Vercel. While the underlying technologies are portable, migrating *from* these specific platforms could involve operational complexities. Additionally, the regulatory environment presents some hurdles; GDPR compliance is 'Assessment Required,' and HIPAA compliance is 'Partially Compliant' (project-specific). These compliance requirements would necessitate careful planning and execution during any migration to ensure continuous adherence to data protection and privacy standards. Despite the 'Total Vendors: 0' data point being inconsistent, the explicit mention of various vendors suggests a diverse set of relationships, but specific dependencies (like Fly.io for Edge Functions) would need to be managed during a migration.

Compliance

8 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Compliant

Supabase holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification, which is the most rigorous level of SOC 2 compliance (covering a period of time, not just a point-in-time assessment). This is independently audited by a licensed CPA firm. Risk is Low because: (1) SOC 2 Type 2 demonstrates sustained operational effectiveness of security controls over an audit period; (2) the certification is available to Enterprise and Team customers for review; (3) Supabase uses Vanta (a compliance automation platform) for continuous monitoring; (4) regular penetration testing is conducted. The main residual risk is that the report covers a specific audit period and must be renewed annually — any lapse in renewal would create a compliance gap.

Evidence: https://supabase.com/security, https://supabase.com/docs/guides/security/soc-2-compliance, https://supabase.com/dashboard/org/_/documents

PCI DSS (source) — Partially Compliant

Supabase does not directly process, store, or transmit payment card data — they use Stripe (a PCI DSS Level 1 certified provider) for all payment processing. This significantly reduces Supabase's own PCI DSS scope. Risk is Low because: (1) by outsourcing payment processing to Stripe, Supabase limits its cardholder data environment (CDE) exposure; (2) Supabase explicitly states it does not store personal credit card information; (3) however, customers who use Supabase to build payment applications may store payment-related data, which would be governed by customer-level PCI DSS obligations, not Supabase's. Supabase's SOC 2 and ISO 27001 controls provide a strong security baseline relevant to PCI DSS.

Evidence: https://supabase.com/security, https://stripe.com/guides/pci-compliance

ISO 27001 (source) — Compliant

Supabase holds ISO 27001 certification, an internationally recognized standard for Information Security Management Systems (ISMS). This is independently audited by an accredited certification body. Risk is Low because: (1) ISO 27001 certification requires a rigorous third-party audit of the entire ISMS, including risk assessment, security controls, and continuous improvement processes; (2) the certificate is available to Enterprise and Team customers; (3) ISO 27001 certification aligns with and reinforces GDPR, HIPAA, and SOC 2 compliance; (4) certification must be maintained through annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification. Residual risk is minimal and limited to the gap between audit cycles.

Evidence: https://supabase.com/security, https://supabase.com/dashboard/org/_/documents

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 8/10

Supabase is a very well-capitalized private company with approximately $1B raised in total funding, including a fresh $500M Series F led by GIC at a $10B pre-money valuation. This provides a long cash runway even at aggressive burn rates. The investor syndicate is blue-chip (Coatue, Felicis, Y Combinator, Mozilla, Craft, Lightspeed, Stripe, Salesforce Ventures, GIC), and Stripe's reinvestment is a strong positive signal. Growth metrics are exceptional: database launches grew 600% YoY, registered developers reached ~10M (doubling in 8 months), and over 60% of new databases are launched via AI coding tools, positioning Supabase strongly in the AI tailwind. The open-source moat (100k+ GitHub stars, 1,500+ contributors) reduces CAC, and enterprise credentials (SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001) support upmarket expansion. However, no audited financials are disclosed—revenue, EBIT, and equity figures are unavailable. The company is likely still loss-making given typical patterns for hyper-growth infrastructure companies, and Series F proceeds are partly for employee secondaries. Competitive pressure from Neon, PlanetScale, Firebase, AWS, MongoDB, and Vercel/Convex is significant, and the $10B valuation is demanding with down-round risk if SaaS multiples contract.

Key strengths: ~$1B in total capital raised, including $500M Series F led by GIC, Blue-chip investor syndicate including Stripe reinvestment and Salesforce Ventures, 600% YoY growth in database launches, ~10 million registered developers, doubling in 8 months, 60%+ of new databases launched via AI coding tools (strong AI tailwind), Open-source moat with 100k+ GitHub stars and 1,500+ contributors, Enterprise compliance credentials (SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001), Diversified product surface (DB, Auth, Realtime, Storage, Functions, Vector)

Risk factors: No public financials disclosed—unit economics and burn rate unverifiable, Likely still loss-making with meaningful COGS from managed Postgres at scale, Intense competition from Neon, PlanetScale, Firebase, AWS RDS/Aurora, MongoDB Atlas, Vercel/Convex, Free-tier / cost-of-abuse exposure amplified by AI-generated projects, Demanding $10B pre-money valuation with down-round risk if SaaS multiples contract, Key-person / founder-led with small executive team, Regulatory/data-sovereignty risk given global customer base on US-parent entity

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report