Sweco Danmark A/S

Denmark · owned by Sweco AB (Sweden) · www.sweco.dk · 15 vendors

Sweco Danmark A/S is Denmark's leading consulting engineering and architecture firm, offering services across building design, transport and infrastructure, water, energy, industry, and digital solutions. With 17 offices across Denmark and approximately 23,000 experts group-wide, the company plans and designs sustainable cities and societies. It is the Danish subsidiary of Sweco AB, Europe's leading architecture and engineering consultancy.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 2

15 direct vendors, 210 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 6/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Medium readiness. The company possesses a strong financial position due to consistent revenue growth, which is crucial for funding a significant migration. Its internal tech stack includes modern components like .NET (modern), PostgreSQL, REST APIs, and leverages agile methodologies, CI/CD pipelines, and AI-assisted development, indicating a capability for modern software development. The experience with developing and operating multiple web-based SaaS platforms (e.g., RenoWeb, DriftWeb) also suggests a foundational understanding of distributed systems. However, the tech stack also includes some potentially legacy components such as .NET Framework and WordPress, which might require refactoring or specific migration strategies. A key challenge for migration readiness is the regulatory environment, particularly GDPR and NIS2, along with likely data residency requirements within the EU, which will necessitate careful planning for cloud provider selection and deployment regions to ensure continued compliance. Regarding vendor relationships, similar to resilience, there is a contradiction: "Total Vendors: 0" is stated, but "Total Services: 14" from "6 unique countries" are also listed. If "Total Vendors: 0" is taken literally, it would imply no vendor lock-in, which would significantly enhance migration readiness. However, assuming the existence of vendors based on the other data, the "Vendor Lock-in Risk" is "Unknown," which introduces uncertainty. The absence of explicit mention of cloud-native architectures like containerization or microservices also suggests that a full cloud migration might involve significant architectural transformation.

Compliance

5 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

ISO 27001 (source) — Partially Compliant

ISO 27001 shows partial compliance with the annual report indicating 'ISO 27001 certifications for the majority of entities.' This suggests some Sweco entities have achieved certification while others may not. Given the company's size, digital services, and client data handling requirements, full ISO 27001 compliance across all entities would be beneficial for risk management and client confidence. Medium risk reflects the gap between current partial compliance and optimal full compliance.

Evidence: https://www.swecogroup.com/investors/financial-information/annual-report/

ISAE 3000 (source) — Assessment Required

ISAE 3000 applicability depends on whether Sweco provides assurance services or requires assurance reporting for sustainability or other non-financial information. As a consultancy, they may need ISAE 3000 for sustainability reporting assurance or when providing assurance services to clients. Risk is low as this is typically a voluntary framework for enhancing credibility of non-financial reporting rather than a mandatory requirement.

Evidence: https://www.swecogroup.com/sustainability/sustainability-report/

NIS2 (source) — Assessment Required

NIS2 applicability requires detailed assessment as Sweco operates in multiple sectors that could qualify as Important Entities under NIS2, including transport infrastructure (railways, metro, roads), water infrastructure (water supply, wastewater treatment), and energy infrastructure (district heating, energy consulting). With 23,000 employees globally and significant revenue, they exceed size thresholds. However, specific sector classification and critical service provision in Denmark needs verification. Non-compliance could result in fines up to €10 million or 2% of annual turnover, plus operational restrictions.

Evidence: https://www.sweco.dk/ydelser/transport-og-infrastruktur/, https://www.sweco.dk/ydelser/vand-energi-og-industri/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 7/10

Sweco Danmark A/S benefits from being a subsidiary of Sweco AB, a large publicly-listed Swedish engineering consultancy with approximately 22,000 employees across ~70 offices in Europe. This parent backing provides access to capital, shared services, and risk diversification that a standalone Danish consultancy would not have. The group has demonstrated consistent growth, roughly doubling revenue from ~SEK 16bn in 2016 to ~SEK 27-28bn in 2023, with EBITA margins around 10-11% at the group level. The Danish business has strong structural tailwinds including the green transition, climate adaptation needs, water infrastructure investment, and major Danish public infrastructure projects (Copenhagen Metro, Femern Belt tunnel, offshore wind, Power-to-X). A high share of public-sector work and framework agreements supports revenue visibility. The diversified end-market exposure across buildings, transport, water, energy, and industry reduces single-sector concentration risk. However, resilience is constrained by the labour-intensive nature of consultancy, where profitability is sensitive to utilisation rates and salary inflation (elevated in the Nordics recently). Intense competition from COWI, Rambøll, NIRAS, Artelia/MOE and Arkitema pressures fee levels. Without access to the specific årsrapport figures for FY2022-2024, a definitive score cannot be given, but the combination of parent strength, market position, and sector tailwinds supports a moderately strong resilience rating.

Key strengths: Backed by listed parent Sweco AB with strong capitalisation, Diversified end markets across buildings, infrastructure, water, energy, Strong tailwinds from green transition and climate adaptation, High share of public-sector and framework agreement work provides revenue visibility, Top-tier market position established via 2015 Grontmij acquisition, Group EBITA margins ~10-11% indicate solid profitability

Risk factors: Labour-intensive model sensitive to utilisation rates and salary inflation, Intense competition from COWI, Rambøll, NIRAS, Artelia/MOE, Arkitema, Project-based revenue vulnerable to public budget/political delays, Subsidiary equity can be managed for group tax/treasury reasons, Elevated Nordic wage inflation pressuring margins

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report