Tamigo

Denmark · www.tamigo.com · 33 vendors

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

6 services in catalogue across 3 categories; runs on 33 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 1

33 direct vendors, 289 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 8/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Tamigo exhibits high migration readiness, largely driven by its modern technology stack. Being a 'Cloud-based SaaS' with 'EU-hosted Cloud Infrastructure' and extensive use of 'Open API / REST API' indicates a highly modular, interoperable, and cloud-native architecture. This design significantly reduces the complexity and effort typically associated with migrating legacy systems. The numerous pre-built integrations with major payroll, HRM, POS, and engagement systems via its Open API further underscore its architectural flexibility and reduced vendor lock-in for its core functionalities. Although 'Total Vendors: 0' is a contradictory data point, the 'Vendor Geographic Diversity: 10 unique countries' implies a multi-vendor environment, which, if managed effectively, can reduce overall vendor lock-in risk. The company's GDPR compliance means it operates within a well-defined regulatory framework, which can streamline compliance aspects during migration. However, specific data residency requirements are not specified, and financial stability for funding a migration is unknown, which could introduce potential challenges.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

SOC 2 (source) — Assessment Required

Tamigo is a cloud-based SaaS provider processing sensitive employee and HR data for 300,000+ users across Europe. SOC2 (developed by the AICPA) is a widely adopted framework for cloud service providers to demonstrate security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy controls. While SOC2 is not legally mandated in the EU, it is increasingly expected by enterprise customers as evidence of robust information security. Tamigo's Trust Center does not reference any SOC2 Type I or Type II report. The absence of a SOC2 report is a medium risk because: (1) Enterprise customers in retail and hospitality increasingly require SOC2 as part of vendor due diligence; (2) Without SOC2, Tamigo cannot independently demonstrate the effectiveness of its security controls; (3) Competitors in the WFM SaaS space commonly hold SOC2 certifications. Risk is not High because SOC2 is voluntary and Tamigo's EU-centric customer base may rely more on ISO 27001 or GDPR compliance as assurance mechanisms.

Evidence: https://www.tamigo.com/trust-center, https://www.tamigo.com/service-level-agreement

ePrivacy Directive — Partially Compliant

Tamigo operates a public-facing website (tamigo.com) and a cloud application (app.tamigo.com) that use cookies and tracking technologies. The ePrivacy Directive (implemented in Denmark via the Danish Executive Order on Cookies) requires informed consent for non-essential cookies. Tamigo's website includes a Cookie Policy page and Privacy Settings functionality, indicating awareness of cookie consent obligations. Risk is Low because: (1) Tamigo has implemented cookie consent mechanisms; (2) The website is primarily B2B-focused, reducing consumer privacy risk; (3) No enforcement actions related to cookie compliance have been identified. Partial compliance is noted because the completeness of cookie consent implementation cannot be fully verified without a technical audit.

Evidence: https://www.tamigo.com/cookies, https://www.tamigo.com/privacy-policy

GDPR (source) — Partially Compliant

Tamigo is headquartered in Denmark (EU) and operates as a cloud-based SaaS workforce management platform processing significant volumes of personal data — including employee names, schedules, payroll data, HR records, time & attendance, and absence reasons — for 300,000+ users across 20 European countries. GDPR is unambiguously applicable. Tamigo has taken visible compliance steps: it has appointed a Security & Compliance Manager (Jaromír Kuchynka), published a Trust Center with a downloadable Data Processing Agreement (DPA), confirmed all customer data is hosted within the EU, and provides GDPR-enabling features (data anonymisation, right to be forgotten, data export, role-based access). However, no independent third-party GDPR audit or certification has been publicly disclosed, and the DPA is self-published rather than externally verified. Risk is rated Medium rather than Low because: (1) Tamigo acts as a data processor for hundreds of thousands of employee records across multiple jurisdictions, each with its own national GDPR implementation nuances; (2) enforcement by Datatilsynet (Denmark's DPA) and other EU DPAs is active; (3) no external audit evidence is available to confirm the completeness of internal controls. The absence of a formal ISO 27001 or SOC2 certification means the security underpinning of GDPR compliance cannot be independently verified.

Evidence: https://www.tamigo.com/trust-center, https://www.tamigo.com/about-us, https://www.tamigo.com/hubfs/Tamigo_April2023/docs/73_controller-dpa.pdf, https://www.tamigo.com/privacy-policy, https://www.tamigo.com/

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Tamigo ApS demonstrates qualitative resilience through its ~20-year operating history (founded 2006), which indicates survival through multiple economic cycles including the COVID-19 pandemic that heavily impacted its core retail and hospitality verticals. The company benefits from a recurring-revenue SaaS model that typically delivers predictable cash flows and high gross margins, supported by a blue-chip international customer base (Marriott, 25hours Hotels, Clarins, McDonald's franchises, SPAR, Salomon, etc.) that reduces customer concentration risk. Its pan-European footprint, evidenced by localization in 15+ languages and 300,000+ users, provides geographic diversification. However, quantitative financial data (revenue, EBIT, equity) could not be retrieved from Danish CVR filings in this session, limiting a definitive assessment. As a Danish ApS filing under class B accounting rules, disclosure may be limited to gross result rather than full revenue. Key risks include vertical concentration in cyclical retail/hospitality sectors, intense competition from well-funded WFM SaaS players (Quinyx, Planday, Deputy, UKG), and sustained S&M investment pressure typical of international SaaS scaling. Overall the qualitative profile suggests moderate resilience, but a definitive score requires the actual årsrapport figures.

Key strengths: Long operating history since 2006 (~20 years), Recurring-revenue SaaS subscription model with high gross margins, Blue-chip multinational customer base (Marriott, Clarins, SPAR, Salomon, 25hours Hotels), Broad European footprint with 15+ localized languages, 300,000+ users across Europe, Product breadth (scheduling, T&A, payroll, HR, communication, KPIs) increases stickiness

Risk factors: Vertical concentration in cyclical retail and hospitality sectors, Intense competition from Quinyx, Planday, Deputy, UKG, Shiftbase, Sona, Rotaready, Bizimply, Papershift, Limited public financial transparency as private ApS with class-B disclosure, FX and multi-country regulatory/compliance exposure across European jurisdictions, Sustained S&M investment needs for international SaaS scaling may pressure EBIT, Pandemic-style shocks to retail/hospitality customers

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report