Team ApS

Denmark · owned by Drycoat Holding ApS (Denmark) · team.dk · 8 vendors

Team ApS is a Danish company with over 30 years of experience in the sale and production of printed materials and labels. They specialize in dangerous goods labeling (ADR/GHS/UN labels), warning signs, prohibition signs, and symbol stickers, and carry a full stock of hazardous goods marking products. They also supply custom/special labels in both large and small print runs.

Resilience scores

Technology vendors

Services catalogue

9 services in catalogue across 5 categories; runs on 8 sub-vendors.

Insights

Last updated 2026-09-13 · revision 3

8 direct vendors, 67 subvendors

Direct vendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Subvendors by controlling owner country (sample)

Migration Readiness: 2/10

Assessed by AI based on technology stack characteristics (cloud-native vs legacy, containerization, microservices), regulatory environment, data residency requirements, financial stability, and vendor lock-in risks. The score ranges from 0-10, where higher scores indicate better readiness for technology migration.

Team ApS demonstrates low migration readiness due to its deeply entrenched legacy technology stack, consisting of WordPress, WP e-Commerce, jQuery, and PHP. This monolithic architecture is not cloud-native, containerized, or microservices-based, indicating that any migration would likely require a substantial re-platforming effort rather than a simple lift-and-shift, significantly increasing complexity, cost, and time. The regulatory environment, particularly GDPR applicability and the requirement for a NIS2 assessment, introduces stringent compliance considerations that must be meticulously addressed during migration, potentially limiting cloud provider choices or necessitating specific architectural designs. While data residency requirements are not explicitly stated, an inferred preference for EU regions (given their Danish HQ) could further constrain migration options. A critical challenge is the absence of publicly available financial stability or growth history, which makes it impossible to assess the company's capacity to fund a potentially extensive and costly modernization and migration project. The provided vendor data is contradictory, stating 'Total Vendors: 0' while simultaneously listing 'Vendor Geographic Diversity: 5 unique countries'. This ambiguity, coupled with an 'Unknown' vendor lock-in risk, makes it difficult to assess vendor-related migration challenges, but the primary lock-in remains the architectural dependency on the current legacy platform.

Compliance

7 in-scope frameworks identified; showing 3.

GDPR (source) — Partially Compliant

Team ApS is headquartered in Denmark (EU member state) and actively collects personal data from customers via their e-commerce platform (name, address, postal code, email, gender, age, interests). GDPR is therefore universally applicable. The risk level is HIGH for several compounding reasons: (1) Their published privacy policy explicitly references the outdated 'Persondataloven' (the pre-GDPR Danish Data Protection Act repealed in 2018) rather than GDPR, indicating the policy has not been updated in over 6 years — a clear compliance gap; (2) The cookie consent mechanism on the website uses a non-compliant 'implied consent' model ('Vi går ud fra du acceptere dette' / 'We assume you accept this'), which does not meet GDPR's requirement for freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous consent; (3) No Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointment is publicly disclosed; (4) No GDPR-compliant Records of Processing Activities (RoPA) is referenced; (5) The Danish Data Protection Authority (Datatilsynet) actively enforces GDPR and has issued fines to Danish companies; (6) Fines can reach up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover under GDPR Article 83.

Evidence: https://www.team.dk/privatliv-og-cookies/, https://www.team.dk/om-team-aps/, https://gdpr-info.eu/art-83-gdpr/, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english

ADR — Assessment Required

Team ApS's core business is manufacturing and selling ADR labels, dangerous goods labels, and GHS chemical hazard symbols. ADR compliance is directly relevant to their product line — their labels must conform to ADR specifications to be legally usable by their customers. Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) if their labels do not meet ADR technical specifications, their customers (transport companies, chemical manufacturers) face regulatory violations; (2) product liability exposure if non-compliant labels are sold; (3) ADR is updated biennially and labels must reflect current requirements; (4) no evidence of formal ADR product compliance testing or certification found on their website.

Evidence: https://www.team.dk/adr-udstyr/, https://www.team.dk/farligt-gods/, https://unece.org/transport/dangerous-goods/adr-2025-files

Danish E-Commerce Act — Partially Compliant

Team ApS operates an e-commerce webshop and uses cookies for analytics, advertising, and behavioral targeting. The EU ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC as amended) and Danish implementing legislation (Cookiebekendtgørelsen) require prior informed consent for non-essential cookies. Risk is MEDIUM because: (1) the website uses an implied consent model ('Vi går ud fra du acceptere dette' — 'We assume you accept this') which is explicitly non-compliant with Danish cookie rules; (2) Datatilsynet has issued guidance and enforcement actions against implied consent cookie banners; (3) Google Analytics cookies are used without proper consent mechanism; (4) advertising/behavioral targeting cookies are deployed without explicit opt-in.

Evidence: https://www.team.dk/privatliv-og-cookies/, https://www.team.dk/, https://www.datatilsynet.dk/english/topics/cookies

Financials

Three-year financials

Financial Resilience Score: 6/10

Team ApS operates in a regulatory-driven niche (ADR dangerous goods labels, GHS chemical hazard symbols, safety signage) where demand is compliance-mandated and relatively recession-resistant. With over 30 years of operating history since the early 1990s, the company has an established customer base among Danish logistics firms, chemical distributors, industrial companies, and public sector buyers. Physical labels remain necessary regardless of broader digitalization trends, giving the business low technology-obsolescence risk. However, the company is a micro/small ApS with very limited scale, likely single-digit employees, and appears to operate from a single Værløse facility. This creates significant key-person risk and concentration risk. Revenue is almost certainly concentrated in Denmark (near 100%) with no geographic diversification, and the company faces competitive pressure from larger label/signage suppliers such as Brady, Seton, and Brother. Input costs tied to vinyl, adhesives, and petrochemical-linked printing consumables can compress margins in inflationary periods. No actual financial figures (revenue, EBIT, equity) could be verified in the research session, so the resilience score is based on qualitative business-model factors rather than balance-sheet strength. The abbreviated class B accounts filed by Danish ApS entities of this size typically do not disclose revenue publicly, further limiting transparency.

Key strengths: Regulatory tailwind from ADR, GHS, and CLP compliance requirements creating non-discretionary demand, Over 30 years of operating history and established niche customer base, Low technology-obsolescence risk as physical safety labels remain mandatory, Small, focused operation with low overhead from single Værløse facility

Risk factors: Very small scale with high key-person/owner-operator dependency, Geographic concentration: almost 100% Denmark-only revenue with no export diversification, Competitive pressure from larger international label/signage suppliers (Brady, Seton, Brother), Input-cost exposure to petrochemical-linked vinyl, adhesives, and printing consumables, Limited digital-marketing investment as suggested by dated website assets from 2013-2015

Revenue by geography

Revenue by product/service

Workforce by country

Signed-in users can see whether their own company is exposed to this vendor's disruption, plus the full sub-vendor list and country breakdowns, every in-scope compliance framework plus gaps and next steps, and alerts when any of it changes.

View the full interactive report